#ceo

Prove me wrong

Shulman started Oct 4.

Closing price — Oct. 3, 2025 $43.67
Closing price — Oct. 21, 2026 $43.31
Share-price return −0.82%

Hmmm...

We at Omnissa have got a new CEO who was previously at PA. Been a week, too chirpy with his nature - would really love to hear some feedback from his term at PA and did he really transform the business and take it to new altitudes ?

I am from the EMEA team, and we only have been hearing about him speak of AI and AI transformation without any real deal/idea.

Isn't CEO supposed to be for like 10 years?

Do we finally have a ceo who is dealing with the weight of the top shelf? Are fall 26 layoffs exec level? What is happening?

Qualcomm will implement a global reduction in workforce following its annual employee reviews. CEO Cristiano Amon communicated this decision to staff via a memo, with notifications scheduled to begin in November. The company aims to foster a stronger performance culture and address areas that have not met expectations. The exact number of affected employees was not disclosed, and the scale of the layoffs remains undetermined. These cuts are influenced by business priorities, organizational needs, and required skill sets.

https://www.reuters.com/business/qualcomm-cut-jobs-worldwide-performance-focused-layoffs-internal-memo-shows-2026-10-20/

Where is this little rat of a CEO hiding?

CEO of GE - institutes the “cut bottom 10%” every year practice. GE crushes profits so wanna-be’s take note.
One groom-ee becomes CEO of Bo-ing. You guessed it, he replaces the quality mindset with “profits above all else” mindset that was what, in theory, made GE so profitable. But look at the safety issues….
One groom-ee becomes CEO of Medtronic. You finish the story….

Torani CEO Melanie Dulbecco believes layoffs are a choice, not a necessity, for companies. She has led the syrup brand for 35 years, growing it from $700,000 in annual revenue to over $800 million. During the pandemic, the company faced financial challenges but chose to avoid layoffs by cutting expenses and pivoting to online sales. Dulbecco emphasizes that building resilience and momentum comes from a united team. The company also uses automation and AI to enhance, rather than replace, its employees' roles.

San Leandro, California

https://www.businessinsider.com/torani-ceo-says-layoffs-are-a-choice-2026-10

If Rich doesn’t survive the counterclaim, who will replace him as CEO ?

1. Chris Bailey
2. Jamie Zendel
3. Jason D’Angelo
4. Ken Young
5. Shannon Morronnarity
6. McKinsey & Co.
7. ACN Chatbot

Tulenko destroyed this company. Worst CEO I have ever known. Clueless pompous a hole.

No layoffs for the foreseeable future , our CEO said our new plan will be built around our most important asset, our people

Rest easy people and collect that cheque

After bad earnings are posted the stock is going right back to the low $40’s. Start looking for a real CEO now.

Make it make sense. These millionaire VP’s and CEO’s living large. I can’t afford a new car and dedicated my life to this stinking company. And for those of you who say oh your choice yea well I didn’t have much of a choice. That doesn’t excuse this company from paying people the way they do. I’m sick of it. They just keep piling the work on with a salary from 2017. No matter how much people scream about it on heartbeat it just gets ignored. I can’t stand them. DDAT blows.

I haven't seen any change since the new CEO came on board... This place is a sinking ship and now I don't hold any hope now. In my view a takeover is inevitable.

What is your thoughtful guess of whick bank will take over Truist?

Actually I think citi makes a lot of sense.

If they were the CEO of DoubleTree hotel, they would cut the cookies.

If they were the CEO of San Pellegrino, they would cut the foil top.

Takis is a placeholder until FB comes back.

we need less expensive peacock vanity projects coming from our Strategy & Transformation and more actual transformation, otherwise stock will be down 50% very soon! a new visionary CEO is long overdue!

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/indias-kotak-mahindra-banks-milind-nagnur-steps-down-coo-cto-2025-01-03/

AT&T’s $T CEO spent September telling everyone $SPCX Starlink’s mobile plan was “not a viable strategy.”

His exact words: satellite solves the last 2%, not the 98%. It can’t penetrate buildings. Small cells won’t fix it. It would cost as much as building a macro network. “A whole bunch of reasons why that won’t effectively work.”

Then SpaceX bought nationwide 800 MHz low-band spectrum today. The exact band Stankey himself admitted gets decent penetration into buildings.

The one he said satellite doesn’t have.
Then the FCC cleared 15,000 Starlink Mobile satellites at 330 km, up to 150 Mbps per user, with a waiver letting SpaceX sell service on spectrum it owns instead of leasing from a carrier.

Then, on October 1, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon launched a joint venture to blanket US dead zones with satellites. Their own words: pooling spectrum, common standards, direct-to-device.
So the timeline is: “not viable” in September. “We need satellites too” in October. Same month.

Stankey also said fiber is three times faster than satellite and nothing beats it. True. Fiber also doesn’t fit in your pocket. Nobody is choosing between a fiber line and a phone plan.

The 2% he dismissed is a $200B+ market. And the company he called non-viable just bought the spectrum layer he said it was missing.

Meanwhile the stock is in free fall down over 10%

AT&T CEO John Stink: Starlink Mobile won’t be able to penetrate walls.

Elon Musk & SpaceX: We’ve acquired 800 MHz spectrum, which will allow Starlink Mobile to provide better indoor coverage, including signals that can penetrate walls and other obstacles.

C suite are underestimating Starlink Mobile.

Just keep building the fantasy factory and prison like tracking systems your employees hate you for - instead of fighting this existential threat. Bunch of m0rons in Dallas.

People getting fired left and RIGHT. CEO is known as "Bob the Butcher." Management is champing at the bit to replace the teachers with AI and to have their instructional content written by AI, regardless of the quality. They do not care. This is a company that has been passed around from PE firm to PE firm, and it is in the process of being completely gutted at the moment. Just being in some of these meetings has turned me into a socialist.

I joined in 2018 and the bank was a great place to work. Rarely laid anyone off even in downturns, coworkers and managers were nice and workload was not too stressful. Then with Richard leaving the bank changed. I left in 2022 because my team was heavily impacted by layoffs and I went to another bank.

Sad hearing from former colleagues and friends that with the latest CEO change things got so much worse. I always thought of US bank as being more conservative and better to their employees than other banks… maybe the pay was a bit lower but the company used to treat employees well. The bank I work for has their own problems too but it saddens me to hear about what happened as I considered US bank a positive place to work and have fond memories of my time there

By far

Maybe our board should do the needful and replace the CEO with our stock in free fall

What has this leading edge CEO done for Intel, I don’t see any documented progress other than this rumor, that dinner, another rumor, some focused laser, sushi, rice and everything nice. This dude is another fake a-s poser it appears, a one trick Asian. They had been zero factual outcome that shows any measure of advancement out of the ditch.

It was announced today that he is transitioning out of Stryker and handing over to his successor in January. Geoff just sold his house in Minnetonka.

Maybe we got lucky and Kevin Lobo is taking over as Medtronic CEO and actually getting us out of the sh!tter?

What is going on with OPTUMServe? Ed Weinberg out! Patricia Hororho coming out of retirement.

Didn’t realize that the board of directors chairman is the chief customer officer of Nordstrom’s. So someone with no insurance experience and no understanding of what reps go through is at the helm of the largest p&c insurer in the US. Sounds about right.

Not been careful with shareholder capital… Yah think?

"A new development shows that even senior executives consider leaving their jobs over requirements to show up to work in person. Microsoft is losing its LinkedIn CEO after nearly two decades, after he determined that he would have to show up in person to effectively lead the company — and he said that was a price he wasn’t willing to pay.

• After nearly two decades at LinkedIn, CEO Ryan Roslansky is leaving.
• He determined that to effectively lead the company, he would have to show up in person at Microsoft’s Redmond, Washington headquarters.
• Roslansky announced that he is moving on rather than accept the significant return-to-office change to his working arrangement."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/executive-leadership-and-management/linkedin-ceo-is-leaving-after-18-years-says-he-didn-t-want-to-return-to-the-office-full-time/ar-AA2dCybB?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=6ac3fdc945af456bae8e8ab5acf7b047&ei=25

​Stock-Based Compensation: The magic trick where the CEO turns your 10% stake in the company into a 7% stake, and then hands you a press release explaining why you should thank him for it.

The ceo is clear

Changing IBM’s CEO alone will not fix its underlying product problem: customers need compelling reasons to choose—and keep paying for—its technology. Recent acquisition Hashicoprp Terraform faces OpenTofu, and IBM’s software must justify its additional cost against cloud-native alternatives. In my view, IBM Bob’s enterprise proposition pales beside Claude Code using Claude models through Amazon Bedrock, supplemented by Martin AI for easier token budgeting, prompt and plugin libraries, and usage leaderboards. That combination addresses both developer productivity and enterprise adoption; Bob must demonstrate a compelling advantage beyond access to models that IBM itself sources from providers such as Anthropic. A leadership change cannot substitute for differentiated products and clear customer value. The board should seriously explore selling IBM while its enterprise relationships and established assets still command substantial value, rather than asking shareholders to finance another turnaround promise.

Personally, I think Ford lost its way beginning with hiring Jim Hackett as CEO.

CEOs

Now they want to fire you if you transfer a call they just looking for a way ti remove you ! Filing a complaint against them as they are just wrong in every way !This is America we don’t play this cr-p here ! They are the worst company ever ! The CEO makes billions off your backs it’s time to quit and discover sold us lot to crime lords

What’s up with the CEO? He’s been on LOA for a while now. Is he coming back? What happened?

Pretty obvious answers. Not much or worse. Retreat like Napoleon had from Russia.

PK, are you listening? Give EH a nice parachute, not sure if it should be golden and tell him to leave.

I am really sick and tired. this all he can show after 2 full years in the helm then what is there for year 3.