I keep seeing G2 in this board. Please give me some hints or at least the initials of their name.
Since Extreme might be acquired by Cisco, I need to get used to the Cisco message board!
Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #management.
Mention #management in your post to continue the discussion!
I keep seeing G2 in this board. Please give me some hints or at least the initials of their name.
Since Extreme might be acquired by Cisco, I need to get used to the Cisco message board!
I'm an NCG who just started at the Training Institute (TI).
What's the likelihood that I'll be a manager or supervisor within six months?
You either have minimum 5 direct reports or none in the new org. For example, if you have 3, and you are still working in the company, you are either getting more or losing them all.
We are hearing some got promotions and some are told you will be part of the next laylof list as a good will by some managers
Well I tell y’all what. I been let go... sorta. These fers come at me with a lower role after they done moved my meetin TWICE already. Reckon the other 2 they offered it to said peace out bichs lol.
So they look at me all sweet an say “now dont ya wanna take some time an think about it?” I said hoss, I been thinkin bout it for 5 dang years cuz you dun pull this same mess evry fn year. Where do I sign?
They said theyd send me the paperwork. I said naw, y’all take my verbal as my signature, fers. I’m fixin to git on outta here.
An I tore outta that parkin lot like a bat outta he-l. YEEHAW!! See y’all on the beach. F YEAH!!! 🤠🏖️
Soo many mistakes are being made by Corporate. Our policies are so different and should have NEVER been moved to the new Platform. We worked our souls for this company and this is what we get!!
This company no longer operates like a professional organization. The most capable leaders have left, and the remaining management is looking inward to hire their own consulting services. Gainwell is a complete mess
Does it have to be only managers who can fail up? Is that a rule or something?
Seriously, “Decision Intelligence Director”??
It seems like for every one blue collar job posting there are 12 bs office postings.
Pizza guy - CRO for Global Enterprise
Used Car Salesman - CRO for Business Markets
Muppets Swedish Chef - Chief Product & Marketing Officer
Flounder from Animal House - VBG CEO
Anyone else?
Workplace Excellence has been in place for awhile now. Has anyone seen any improvements after putting in a request on the site?
They say a lot of things, but I am curious if there have been any actual action behind them.
Did any other officers in RISK/FRAUD get pulled into meetings with their manager today about manager changes?
On a scale from 1 to 10.
I hope when all of this goes down Aetna takes a good hard look at the multitude of layers of management. My friend is a lead director. Ready for this? Above her- AVP, VP, Sr. VP, EVP & COO, EVP & President, Chairman. I mean seriously what do the 4 layers above her even do?
Hi folks.
I've always heard (but never seen proof with actual numbers) that it's absolutely possible, and actually quite common, that higher grade AEs have a higher total compensation than their own managers (usually Senior Manager levels).
I was wondering if such a dynamic can happen also within Inside sales, with more senior ISRs/ISAEs having a higher TC than their Inside Sales Managers (who are on "manager" grade, not "senior manager").
Some said it's possible, but from what I know Inside Sales have a pretty rigid compensation plan, with almost no margin to negotiate, so it sounds very unlikely to me.
If someone has figures (also in %) comparing ISM/ISR compensation ranges it would be very interesting, since I've always been curious to understand what the delta is between an IC and manager position within the same org and level.
Is it just anti American to unionize or the retaliation from employer towards those who organize is the fear?
I am new to this job but I want to understand why with so much dissatisfied/ disgruntled employees posting multiple times a week about how burnt out they are, why aren't they taking action?
Is it about the litigation costs? I would like to see Fidelity management prove their claims of increased collaboration in a courtroom in front of an objective judge. Or is that not even grounds for a trial? I don't even know, I am so confused.
All I’ve heard is Gibbs is destroying everyone and heritage Product Solutions managers are micromanaging and pushing out the Upstreamers
Do managers know when the next layoff will be and who will be impacted ?
but instead of removing nepotism and cronyism, he has amplified it because the leaders who got pushed out were the least "protected".
Just look at who's in the calibration room when it's promotion time for this performance cycle. This company is rotten.
This company wastes everyone's time with its low ball offers. They act like people are willing to move half way across the world to a country with a totally different culture and then risk getting blown up by missiles for the same wages or lower than the job would pay back home. Even if I were unemployed, I would think twice before accepting this. Aramco keeps doing this delusional s#^t because management is completely out of touch and no one pushes back. At least posting these offers allows potential candidates to know what salary they are likely to get before they waste hours of their time applying and going through interviews. Many companies post salary ranges for a job to avoid this kind of problem, but I guess Aramco thinks it won't (can't) be held accountable.
20% off the top? Verizon can easily get there by rolling back a fraction of the layers of band 5+ fat built up without touching anyone else. Ever hear of a corporation whose CEO gets axed and is not followed by their disciples? Verizon continues to be saddled with way too many unnecessary SVP's, EVP's, VP's, AVP's, Sr Directors, Directors, etc. It's absurd. And the VZ board needs a slap for allowing it. Bertolini needs to be shown the door. Perhaps a trip to the Verizon annual meeting for an employee presentation of what’s really going on is needed. Any middle manager who threatens a report with "get on the bandwagon or leave'' needs to be reminded – uh, excuse me – “you’re actually the cause of this – and the target.”
I'm getting pretty tired of the games management plays. They sell you on some big project or exciting change, making you believe it's an opportunity to prove yourself and move up. In reality, it's often just a way to squeeze more out of you while their favorites are quietly positioned for promotions. You're told that taking on more responsibility, expanding your scope, and delivering beyond expectations is what it takes to get ahead. So you work yourself into the ground, believing the promises. Then a year or two later, promotion time comes, and the same favorites get rewarded. At some point, you realize the game was never fair, and the hard work was never the deciding factor.
Over the last couple years I found that mgmt here has decided they would rather use human capital or other headhunters to place sub-par people into upper mgmt roles than to take employee suggestions on who might be a good hire.
We have gone external for a lot of role - and not a single external hire has been impressive but they all get paid more than internals.
Like of course a head hunters firm that gets paid on placing candidates in your shop will tell you everyone walks on water other than your own employees….
What is this thing of departments having a revolving door of people coming in and going out in a matter of weeks.
Why nobody holds them accountable of poor judgement, biased hiring and dragging everyone down with their poor decisions.
What is this sh*t of "people's person" over technical skills too. Wasn't this hellhole supposed to be an engineering and science hub.
Stupid people with pseudo degrees in everything but oil and gas, I'd guess.
If you work for one of the smaller gp owned subsidiaries, do you have a president at your company who is an active participant in the company and checks in with dept heads?
I’m at a subsidiary and it feels directionless and other upper management folks are making decisions for our company that don’t seem to make any logical business sense
Are any of you experiencing the same thing ?
If any manager has experience, please let us know what you are looking at the most and what happens if you have attendance issues on your team
What is the true purpose of appointing an interim lead if the decision ultimately inflicts more damage than stability on an organization? While interim positions are theoretically designed to keep the ship steady during executive transitions, inserting an under-qualified placeholder into a highly specialized function often backfires. Instead of seamlessly bridging a gap, it frequently breeds confusion among staff, undermines trust in department leadership, and signals to the rest of the company that the role’s actual expertise is secondary. When a placeholder lacks the deep operational domain knowledge required to guide a team through ongoing budget cuts and structural shifts, it raises a fundamental question for anyone watching from the inside: do interim positions genuinely serve a strategic purpose, or do they inevitably cause more harm than good?
We all got the email and I know this is a d-mb question but what Band levels do you all think will be most affected? Some say middle management should worry, others argue it’s going to be the regular workers (Band 1 and 2) this time. I theorize it will be a mix of everyone.
It has been proven a million times over that managers begin to get strategic about who they let go and rank, not on honesty at that moment, but on giving themselves wiggle room for future cuts. Some low-performers get kept for future cuts to save current mid-tier players who will be lower in the future. Some good but difficult members get culled under the guise of a ranking. It does not work.
ML loves them
So here we are
What the he-l happened to Service Costing, Marketplace vendors, VMO, AI Competitions and all the other BS they used to subject us to?
We have the same EMT but suddenly they realized all those things don’t matter? WTF did we waste so much time on them? All that time could have been better spent preventing MI’s.
Who is accountable for the lack of judgment?
It seems like it is difficult to terminate to mod level managers, Senior mgrd or directors.
Does HR look at how much turnover there is under a manager? We currently have managers with one or two reports. Why even keep them here for that?
My SVP has about 600 directs. There are way more senior directors and managers than actual employees who do ALL the work. I’m not exaggerating. I’ve just spent an hour on teams browsing the organizational structure and I’m in shock.
Only the employees (analysts, consultants) got laid off in the recent layoffs in my org, not a single director or VP btw.
One of the senior directors had 7 directs, she has now 1. Her direct is also a director. I know them both, they spend whole days on meetings providing amazing “insights”. All the meaningful projects they were involved in are long dead, because employees are gone.
Amazon is implementing a new round of layoffs affecting management positions. A total of ninety-five jobs will be eliminated across various locations. Two of these positions are located in Pasco. Employees were notified in early September and will depart by early December or late January. The company is offering severance and other support to affected workers.
Pasco, Washington
https://www.tricitiesbusinessnews.com/articles/amazon-layoffs-affect-pasco-operations
If you’re from PI brace yourself the president from SM specimen management from flks is coming to a screen near you and she will destroy everything in her way .. all I can tell you is SM is celebrating her exit ..
201 types of managers. 47 meetings. 19 approval chains. 12 PowerPoints.
1 technical guy doing the actual work. 💀
Fake metrics
Fake conference calls
Fake Dispatches to make up my day so my supervisor meets his numbers
Fake busy work because our side of the business is dead
Counting down the days. Tick tock tick tock.
Whenever management runs out of ideas, we're told to squeeze more work into the same hours with fewer resources. I'm sick of being expected to compensate for their sh-t decisions.
A couple of posts appeared here on Monday stating there were HR meetings with managers that afternoon.
It's two days later. Does anybody have any knowledge on these meetings? Did they indeed happen? Any inside knowledge on what exactly was discussed?