#ceo

It’s difficult to see employees lose their jobs while executive compensation remains so high. According to public filings, CEO compensation was approximately $18 million. Many affected employees gave years of service to the company, and the contrast between layoffs and executive pay raises legitimate questions about priorities

Who wants to submit them to the Guinness book of WR? How can you destroy 2 top 10 banks? Unreal!

Many people outside the oil industry believe oil prices will decline rapidly once the Strait reopens and remain low in the coming years. However, the CEO of global oil giant Shell (NYSE:SHEL) has a different view. He expects oil prices to continue rising long after the war ends.

Ideas? What happens to Shell’s 8 year reserve life?

Takis is probably one of the best known fintech talent. Grew JPM from 7 people to 15K people & 20 billion revenue run-rate. Probably the best we could hope for. Not sure why Mike Lyons got the CEO role in the first place — he clearly has no clue about the payment industry. He’s a banker…

We’ve made measurable strides in fiber deployment and 5G, alongside solid free cash flow and prudent capital allocation, the reality is stark: after five years of this leadership, our stock has fallen 20% over the past year materially underperforming the broader market that has delivered meaningful gains. This persistent gap between our strategic plans and actual shareholder value creation is no longer acceptable. The transformation narrative has run its course without delivering results. For the sake of restoring accountability and protecting long-term owner interests, it is time for John Stankey to step down or be replaced. We require leadership with the urgency and execution focus to turn our strong underlying assets into tangible stock price performance.

The Chief Executive Officer of Health Net of California, Brian Ternan leaving - will be declared later today.

Metric Value
Price on July 1, 2020 $23.40
Price on June 18, 2026 $22.00

Cumulative price return - 6.0%
Holding period 5.97 years
Annualized price return - 1.0%

Our CEO loves to call layoffs realignments

Lyons need to start by rewriting the mission and vision statement, and permanently ban trigger words like "meaningful" and" "purpose-driven." The only purpose and mission Bill had was to run the company into the ground and take a meaningful amount of cash with him.

Era – Michael Neidorff (1996–2022)
Peak Quarterly Performance: $535 million (Q2 2021)
Annual Performance: Maintained profitability
Main Drivers: Pharmacy benefit manager legal settlements; COVID-19 utilization spikes

Era – Sarah London (2022–Present)
Peak Quarterly Loss: $6.6 billion (Q3 2025)
Peak Annual Performance: $6.7 billion net loss (Full-Year 2025)
Main Drivers: Federal Medicaid funding cuts; asset write-downs

Why is Sara London still the face of this company if she has cost the company Billions??

The company took immediate steps to retain other top executives. Suryadevara was promoted to president on Monday, according to an analyst report from TD Cowen. A Fiserv spokesperson declined to comment on that information.

Also, Chief Financial Officer Paul Todd received a stock grant equal to $5 million, according to the SEC filing, amounting to a measure designed to retain him.

https://www.paymentsdive.com/news/fiservs-new-ceo-retains-team/823029/?utm_campaign=Yahoo-Licensed-Content&utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=referral

Give us the scoop on Lyons. Already sent corporate email to all of Truist saying hello. More info coming soon. We are ecstatic to get rid of our current CEO to a forced retirement.
What does Mike think about hybrid. Working from home 2-3 days a week?
From the Fiserv message board, looks like he joined Fiserv to be an axe man, now he is dragging his axe out to the next victim (Truist bank).
Does he realize most companies, especially in the financial sector are very top heavy.
Does he get rid of management, or the people at the bottom doing all the work.
Thanks for any advice you can share.

Disloyal, sneaky and incompetent. Does the Truist boatd want to tank their stock?

I'm curious what type of communication was sent to employees about the exit and new CEO. Hopefully they have an all hands and give reassurance.

According to reporting today, Centene offered voluntary buyouts to most employees and indicated layoffs could follow if enough employees don't accept. CEO Sarah London told employees, "When our membership shifts, we need to shift our organization accordingly." The company reportedly had about 61,000 employees in Q1 2026. (Bloomberg Law)

## Updated Timeline

### Phase 1: 2022–2024

New leadership takes over.

Board thesis:

• Modernize Centene
• Become more technology-driven
• Improve member outcomes
• Diversify beyond traditional Medicaid dependence

At this point, the strategy was defensible.

### Phase 2: 2024–2025

Warning signs emerge.

Management faced:

• Medicaid redeterminations
• Rising utilization
• ACA Marketplace volatility
• Expiring enhanced subsidies

This is where forecasting and scenario planning become critical.

### Phase 3: 2025–2026

The strategy begins unraveling.

What happened:

Membership

• Medicaid enrollment declines.
• ACA Marketplace enrollment drops far more than originally anticipated after subsidy changes and premium increases. Centene expected ACA membership to fall from roughly 5.5 million to about 3.5 million after repricing. (Healthcare Dive)

Financials

• Massive earnings deterioration.
• Guidance credibility damaged.
• Investor confidence weakened. (Healthcare Dive)

Organization

• Executive restructuring announced in April 2026. (Investor Relations | Centene Corporation)
• Now voluntary buyouts and potential layoffs announced in June 2026. (Bloomberg Law)

# The New Insight

The buyout program is not the problem.

It is evidence of the problem.

When a payer begins broad voluntary separation programs after:

• Membership losses
• Earnings deterioration
• Multiple prior layoffs
• Organizational restructuring

it usually means management now believes the revenue base has permanently reset lower than previously expected. (Bloomberg Law)

In other words:

They are no longer planning for a temporary disruption.

They are resizing the company for a smaller future membership base.

That is a much more significant signal than the layoffs themselves.

# What This Says About Leadership

My view now:

## CFO Accountability: 40%

The CFO owns:

• Forecasting
• Scenario modeling
• Guidance
• Financial planning

The Marketplace membership collapse should have been modeled more aggressively.

Questions a board should ask:

• What was the expected subsidy expiration impact?
• What was the worst-case scenario?
• Why were forecasts so far off?
• Why did guidance have to be revised?

Those are CFO questions.

## CEO Accountability: 60%

The CEO owns:

### Strategic Direction

The critical decision wasn't the forecast.

The critical decision was:

"Marketplace will offset Medicaid losses."

That appears increasingly incorrect.

The company effectively:

• Lost Medicaid members
• Lost Marketplace members
• Lost operating leverage

And now must shrink the workforce to match the new reality. (Bloomberg Law)

That's fundamentally a strategic issue.

# What Would a Board Likely Do?

If I were sitting on the board today, I would ask:

### Question 1

Was this primarily:

• a forecasting failure?

or

• a strategy failure?

The answer determines who goes.

### If Forecasting Failed

Replace:

• CFO
• Chief Actuary
• Finance leadership

Retain CEO.

### If Strategy Failed

Replace:

• CEO

Possibly retain CFO if forecasts reflected the risks and leadership ignored them.

# My Assessment Today

With everything now known:

1. Medicaid losses
2. Marketplace losses
3. Subsidy expiration effects
4. Pricing issues
5. Guidance issues
6. Workforce reductions
7. Voluntary buyouts

I no longer see this as primarily a finance problem.

I see it as a strategy and execution problem.

The workforce reduction announcement is especially important because it demonstrates leadership is now reacting to membership losses rather than benefiting from a growth strategy. (Bloomberg Law)

# If This Were My Board Recommendation

Near term (next 6 months)

• Replace or restructure portions of Finance and Actuarial leadership.
• Bring in an external operating advisor with deep Medicaid and payer turnaround experience.
• Require a comprehensive membership recovery and profitability plan.

Medium term (next 12 months)

If:

• Membership stabilizes,
• Margins recover,
• Workforce reductions achieve targets,

then the CEO survives.

If:

• ACA membership continues declining,
• Medicaid pressure persists,
• Another major earnings miss occurs,

then I would expect the board to seriously evaluate replacing the CEO.

## Final Assessment

Looking at Centene from before Sarah through today, the company appears to have moved from a highly disciplined Medicaid operator under Michael Neidorff to a company attempting a broader transformation under Sarah London. The challenge is that the transformation coincided with one of the most difficult payer environments in decades. The latest buyout program is a strong signal that leadership now believes the enrollment and revenue outlook is materially lower than previously expected, forcing the organization into another round of cost reductions. Based on the information available today, I would assign greater accountability to the CEO than the CFO because the root issue appears to be strategic positioning and market assumptions, not simply financial forecasting. (Bloomberg Law)

if the new guy schedules an all-hands this week And includes at least some assurances that he’ll treat us like actual human beings, there’s a chance he could be a good leader.
If he doesn’t, then he’s an axe man who wants to get rid of as many of us as possible

Why aren't any of the CEO's who make millions and millions of dollars a year taking the VSP and being transparent about it?

LEAD BY EXAMPLE!!

UNSTABLE PILLARS - FOSTER A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, DRIVING BUSINESS ACCOUNTABILITY

Hi Bank of America peeps. A few of us from Truist are checking in. Mike Lyons was just named our new incoming CEO. What was it like working for him during his time there? Solid leader? How did he handle culture, trust, accountability, and employee engagement?

Any flexibility on remote work or work-life balance, or was it more old-school in-office?
It's fair to say morale is quite poor right now, and many of us are looking for signs that things can improve with no expectations of instant miracles. Curious if you noticed any positive shifts over the longer term under him, even when changes got messy. Good, bad, or ugly, we'd appreciate hearing about it.

Hi PNC folks. A few of us from Truist are checking in. Mike Lyons was just named our new incoming CEO. What was it like working for him during his time there? Solid leader? How did he handle culture, trust, accountability, and employee engagement? Any flexibility on remote work or work-life balance, or was it more old-school in-office?

It's fair to say morale is quite poor right now, and many of us are looking for signs that things can improve with no expectations of instant miracles. Curious if you noticed any positive shifts over the longer term under him, even when changes got messy. Good, bad, or ugly, we'd appreciate hearing about it.

Hi Fiserv folks! Several Truist people stopping by your forum. Mike Lyons was just announced as our incoming CEO. What can you tell us about working under him? Decent guy overall? How was his leadership style? Transparent and approachable, or more top-down? Did he allow any real flexibility with remote/hybrid work or was it mostly strict in-office?

Things have been challenging at Truist for quite a while, and morale and confidence in leadership are at some of the lowest levels many of us have ever seen, so we're realistic that a new leader won't fix everything overnight. From what we've heard, he stepped into a tough spot at Fiserv too. For anyone who was there during his time, did you see things starting to improve on culture, trust, accountability, employee engagement, or work-life balance, even if the transition was difficult or painful at first? Any honest long-term thoughts? Good, bad, or mixed? Appreciate the real talk.

We are not mad at you. You stepped into this circus unknowingly.....best of luck

Right? As bad as Mike was, he was still better than Frank.

Start with Divya please.

that if you’re handsome and halfway articulate you will get many opportunities to fail upwards.

Only way to explain it for how incompetent he was here

He was working at PNC for 13 years. Any feedback about him, good or bad? Comment of his work style? What might he be executing at Truist?

Also, why did he leave PNC after such a long time. Passed over for CEO role?

Thank you - a Truist employee

You’re spending a year fixing someone else’s disaster. Activist investors are circling. Employees hate the cuts. Shareholders hate the stock. Then a top 10 U.S. bank offers you its CEO seat. Who wouldn’t take that deal?

We wanted change, we got change. Let's wait for at least a few months or even weeks before we form our opinions on whether the new CEO will be good or bad for us. Or is that too much to ask for?

Congratulations to everyone on successfully participating in the CEO selection process by existing under it.

This is your friendly reminder that we'll all spend more waking hours under our CEO than under most elected officials, yet one is chosen by millions and the other by a handful of board members.

Lee Raymond, Who Created Exxon Mobil, Dies at 87

He oversaw Exxon’s acquisition of a rival, cut costs relentlessly and denied the scientific consensus on climate change.

Lee Raymond, the chairman and chief executive of Exxon Mobil Corp., at a news conference in 2005. A former high school debating champion, he was known for making withering remarks to those who challenged him.

Lee R. Raymond, who as chief executive of Exxon Mobil wrung out costs to make that global oil company the most profitable in its industry while stoutly resisting the scientific consensus that burning fossil fuels was causing a potentially disastrous warming of the Earth, died on Saturday in Dallas. He was 87.

His death, at a hospital, was confirmed by his son Colin, who said the cause was complications of pneumonia. Mr. Raymond’s agreement in 1998 to acquire Mobil — a transaction valued at about $81 billion, then the largest corporate merger ever — created the world’s biggest private-sector oil company in terms of annual
sales, operating in 200 countries. The deal reunited the two biggest parts of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil

Trust, sundered in 1911 by federal trust busters in an effort to spur competition. During his reign as chief executive, from 1993 to 2005, Mr. Raymond relentlessly cut costs, including eliminating a third of the executive jobs after the merger, and helped boost net income to $36.13 billion from $4.8 billion. The company’s market value increased fourfold to $375 billion.

Mr. Raymond shunned publicity. There was no discernible effort to make him seem endearing or personable to the general public or even to his own employees. He was known for making withering remarks in response to questions from employees or investment analysts. “What you’re hearing today may seem boring,” he said at an analyst meeting in March 2005. “You’ll just have to live with outstanding, consistent financial and operating performance.”

At company headquarters in Irving, Texas, he worked in a hushed office suite known as the God Pod, where a painting of a tiger hung behind his desk. Some employees nicknamed him “Iron A-s,” according to “Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American Power,” a 2012 book by the journalist Steve Coll.

Before Mr. Raymond became chief executive, his biggest public role was taking charge of the company’s response after the Exxon Valdez tanker ran aground on a reef in Alaska’s Prince William Sound in March 1989. The accident spilled 11 million gallons of crude and blackened 1,500 miles of coastline. Mr. Raymond, then Exxon’s president, oversaw the cleanup and, in 1991, helped negotiate a $1 billion settlement of federal and state legal charges arising from the spill. He accused environmentalists and politicians in Alaska of making the disaster worse by refusing to let Exxon spray chemical dispersants on the oil slick shortly after the spill.

In 1994, a federal jury in Anchorage ordered Exxon to pay $5 billion in punitive damages to about 34,000 fishermen and other Alaskans who said they were harmed by the spill. Exxon appealed, leading to another 14 years of litigation.

In a 2008 Supreme Court ruling, the damages were reduced to $500 million.
In the early 2000s, as BP and Chevron courted public favor by touting their investments in alternative energy sources, Exxon took a hard line against government restrictions on fossil fuels and funded research challenging the consensus on global warming.
Mr. Raymond, a former high school debating champion who had a Ph.D. degree in chemical engineering, considered himself a scientist with standing to question that consensus. In a 2005 interview with the public television host Charlie Rose, Mr. Raymond said there was a “natural variability” to temperatures on Earth over
millenniums. “If we weren’t here, the climate would change,” Mr. Raymond said. “It has to do with sunspots, it has to do with the wobble of the Earth, and it has — there are all kinds of things that come and go. If you talk to a geologist, he will tell you the Earth, over its history, has been much warmer than it is now and much colder.”

Because wind, solar and other alternative energy sources were costly and could not replace oil and gas in the near term, he argued, Exxon should focus on finding and pumping more oil, including, if possible, in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

Environmentalists regularly denounced Exxon. “There is a spectrum of corporate behavior on global warming and Exxon is the epitome of denial and deception,” Kert Davies, then the research director at Greenpeace USA, told The New York Times in 2005.

Mr. Raymond also resisted corporate trends toward greater acceptance of g-y rights. After Exxon acquired Mobil, the combined company rescinded Mobil policies banning discrimination on the basis of s-xual orientation and ended a practice of providing benefits to same-s-x partners. The moves prompted some g-y and le----n drivers to boycott Exxon service stations.

Under Mr. Raymond’s successor, Rex Tillerson, Exxon Mobil adopted more inclusive policies and acknowledged that human activity contributed to climate change.
Mr. Raymond seemed unbothered by the unpopularity of his views. “I’ve never had a focus group to decide what my persona is out there,” he told The Wall Street Journal in 1997.

Nor did he wish to discuss his personal life. During a court hearing on the Valdez oil spill in the 1990s, an Exxon lawyer asked Mr. Raymond to sum up his background. “I hope this doesn’t get too boring,” Mr. Raymond said. “It kind of bores me.”

Mr. Raymond, center, addressed shareholders during an Exxon annual meeting in 1989. Nine years later, he oversaw the agreement to acquire Mobil.

Lee Roy Raymond was born in Watertown, S.D., on Aug. 13, 1938. His father, Clifford, a railroad engineer, encouraged the young man’s studious ways. In the 1997 interview, Mr. Raymond recalled his father’s alluding to a lack of opportunities in South Dakota and saying, “You have to get an education and get out of here.” After excelling in high school debate and extemporaneous speaking, Mr. Raymond enrolled at the University of Wisconsin and graduated in 1960 with a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering.

He married Charlene Hocevar in 1961. They had three children, male triplets.
In addition to his wife and son Colin, he is survived by two other sons, John and Rob; and seven grandchildren. Mr. Raymond earned his doctorate in chemical engineering at the University of Minnesota in 1963 and joined Exxon the same year as a production research engineer in Tulsa, Okla. He later headed operations in Venezuela. In the mid-1970s, he impressed his bosses by turning an unprofitable refinery in Aruba into a
reliable source of profits.

After returning to the United States, he headed Exxon’s nuclear power business and oversaw the sale of a subsidiary selling office equipment, including Qyx electronic typewriters.

During his 12 years as chairman and chief executive, his compensation totaled more than $686 million, or $144,573 a day, according to an analysis done for The Times by Brian Foley, an independent compensation consultant.

That compensation amounted to “entrepreneurial returns for managerial conduct,” Charles M. Elson, a corporate governance scholar at the University of Delaware, told The Times in 2006. “Exxon was there long before Mr. Raymond was there and will be there long after he leaves. Yet he received Rockefeller returns without taking the Rockefeller risk.”

An Exxon Mobil spokesman at the time said Mr. Raymond’s performance justified his pay. Mr. Raymond was a director of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its predecessor, J.P. Morgan & Co., for 33 years before stepping down in 2020. He also was on the board of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington.

His hobbies included duck hunting and golf. In a 2013 interview with Investor’s Business Daily, he recalled having made three holes in one. On the corporate jet, he liked to drink milk with popcorn in it, Mr. Coll reported.

One of Mr. Raymond’s sons, John, co-founded Energy & Minerals Group, a private equity firm. “My father gave me three things,” John Raymond told The Journal in 2014. “He gave me work ethic, he gave me a good education and he gave me no money.”

Though Lee Raymond was known for his pugnacity, he had a softer side, according to Mr. Coll’s book: “He could be fiercely loyal to ExxonMobil colleagues and sometimes wept openly when subordinates faced illnesses or other personal struggles.”

Best news this year - Mike is out. Maybe now we have someone who actually understands payments and really cares about people instead of just saying it.

Now let’s get Dhivya out of here and we may have a chance.

The new CEO will want to make an impression from the start. My guess is he'll do it by cutting costs, whether that's needed or realistic or not. It happened with every new CEO and it'll happen with this one. The higher-ups fu-k up and we pay the price. Every single time.

On a scale of 1 to "heading back to the FB-plantation" how will the employees fair?

https://investors.fiserv.com/news-releases/news-release-details/fiserv-announces-leadership-transition

Mike is a gentleman but too much damage done by Frank. He can’t fix.

Takis is a horrible choice, he was groomed by Gibbons and didn’t have a role for a year after hiring Fiserv. Yes, Gibbons!

The Takis and Dhivya show will take FISV to $20/share. The chick Kent differentiate between workflows , automation and AI.

This company was at the top because of how prior CEOs before Frank respected their workforce, a reboot is needed.

I hope I am wrong but naming Takis immediately as the permanent ceo feels like a short sighted panic move. I am surprised they didn’t name him acting while the right long term leader could be found.

They hire another old banker from another bank. Really thinking outside of the box here….lol.

Destroys all value and jumps ship

Software company ServiceNow announced layoffs affecting 63 workers in its San Diego office. This action contradicts CEO Bill McDermott's earlier pledge to maintain a steady headcount. Dozens more employees across California were also impacted. Many affected roles are senior positions in sales and consulting. The company reported strong revenue and profit in the first quarter. Investors, however, expressed dissatisfaction with AI growth projections.

San Diego, California

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2026/06/12/servicenows-ceo-said-no-layoffs-then-fired-63-employees-in-san-diego/

While belk is hanging on by a thread, your trusty CEO Don Hendricks is scooping up and selling multi-million dollar luxury real estate in the exclusive enclave of Martha’s Vineyard. Light years away from his dilapidated stores and underpaid, overworked employees.

https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/so-you-want-to-be-chairman-of-exxon/