#legacy

Posts mentioning hashtag #legacy

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #legacy.

Mention #legacy in your post to continue the discussion!

Neiman Marcus Downtown Dallas Closes

The historic Neiman Marcus flagship store in Downtown Dallas has closed its doors after over a century of operation. While the original location is gone, key elements of its legacy will be preserved. These include the Zodiac Room, the Bridal Salon, and historic art, which will be integrated into the NorthPark Center store. The beloved downtown Santa will also return for holiday events at the NorthPark location. This transition signifies a shift in focus for the luxury retailer, honoring its past while looking to the future.

Dallas, Texas

https://www.chron.com/texas/article/neiman-marcus-dallas-flagship-22464505.php


The right thing to do, the Fiserv thing to do, and doing nothing.

Long-time employees have heard of, or even been involved in, one of the many attempts to consolidate platforms. Each and every project has been abandoned after smart people laid out the reasons why it can’t be done, at least to senior executives’ expectations. But here we are again. The people at the top have no history of these events and most have no tech background. What’s the right thing to do? Bite the bullet and build new systems using the latest and greatest tools. TSYS, now Global, and soon to be partly FIS, figured this out 27 years ago when they built a new platform. They ate our lunch for a while selling it to new customers but then started losing to First Data when their client contracts were up on the old system and a conversion was required. We should have done this too. Instead, we’ve spent these 27 years NOT consolidating platforms, and making it more difficult by acquiring more. Of course we’re not even contemplating this. We’re going to continue to do the Fiserv thing - chase ghosts and waste time. It would be better to do nothing.


Activist Jana pushes Fiserv to accelerate cost cuts and tap Palantir

"Reuters obtained a letter in which Jana argues that Fiserv’s current $500 million Project Elevate savings target by 2029 should be raised to about $1.25 billion, and wants management to announce the more aggressive target with third-quarter earnings. Jana is also pushing Fiserv to use Palantir to rationalize technology spending, retire technical debt, and reduce legacy-vendor costs. Fiserv had not responded publicly to Reuters as of the report." https://www.reuters.com/business/activist-jana-pushes-fiserv-accelerate-cost-cuts-tap-palantir-2026-09-28/


Move On!

09/25 here. Move on guys it’s a brave new world. There is no future for legacy companies like Oracle. For those who have not tried Claude or its reasonable facsimiles, just do it. India has been canceled. Retool and hit the bricks.


The right way!

Offer an Early Retirement Option for those that have endured. Cut the horrible people we have endured. Give the future generation a chance. The time is now. The longer you wait the more damage you endure. Morale is at an all time low, no one believes. The time for change is now, not October 22, but now. You commit, then maybe we commit. Not till then. Damn you arrogant leaders that continue to try to save your failed legacy. Enough is enough. If you need to make cuts do it now. If you continue to play a game with our livelihoods, you are the cowards. No one will follow you. Tick, tick, tick…


Qualcomm GPU team legacy hirings

Looks like the Qualcomm GPU team operates on family ties. While most people need a relevant Master's degree to get hired, I just get to know that some junior engineers with an unrelated Bachelor's was brought on a few years ago—and legacy hiring like that makes it feel like a family business


Verizon is a lost cause, missed the next telecom revelation.

Innovation is lacking. Billions lost on useless 5G. Han's and the engineers could not figure out where we are headed. What is the future for telecom?

Opportunity is there but who has the vision and leadership to succeed? Not ATT or VZ.

Satellite and new technology is evolving daily and these legacy companies are so behind it's embarrassing. Dinosaur 70's leadership. It will change eventually and the landscape will be massively different.

It's a race to the bottom currently and Big Red is leading the charge.

Sorry Dan, but AI cannot fix VZ. Not with you in charge.


Fox Pro, Dbase Plus

ACN moving from AI To Fox Pro, Dabse Plus technologies that were ruling the world in late 1980's, J is also thinking about Mainframes and AS 400 as other alternatives. Please dust your skill set, this clown will do anything before she quits in september 26


Lee Raymond, Who Created ExxonMobil, Dies at 87 - The New York Time Summary of His Legacy

Lee Raymond, Who Created Exxon Mobil, Dies at 87

He oversaw Exxon’s acquisition of a rival, cut costs relentlessly and denied the scientific consensus on climate change.

Lee Raymond, the chairman and chief executive of Exxon Mobil Corp., at a news conference in 2005. A former high school debating champion, he was known for making withering remarks to those who challenged him.

Lee R. Raymond, who as chief executive of Exxon Mobil wrung out costs to make that global oil company the most profitable in its industry while stoutly resisting the scientific consensus that burning fossil fuels was causing a potentially disastrous warming of the Earth, died on Saturday in Dallas. He was 87.

His death, at a hospital, was confirmed by his son Colin, who said the cause was complications of pneumonia. Mr. Raymond’s agreement in 1998 to acquire Mobil — a transaction valued at about $81 billion, then the largest corporate merger ever — created the world’s biggest private-sector oil company in terms of annual
sales, operating in 200 countries. The deal reunited the two biggest parts of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil

Trust, sundered in 1911 by federal trust busters in an effort to spur competition. During his reign as chief executive, from 1993 to 2005, Mr. Raymond relentlessly cut costs, including eliminating a third of the executive jobs after the merger, and helped boost net income to $36.13 billion from $4.8 billion. The company’s market value increased fourfold to $375 billion.

Mr. Raymond shunned publicity. There was no discernible effort to make him seem endearing or personable to the general public or even to his own employees. He was known for making withering remarks in response to questions from employees or investment analysts. “What you’re hearing today may seem boring,” he said at an analyst meeting in March 2005. “You’ll just have to live with outstanding, consistent financial and operating performance.”

At company headquarters in Irving, Texas, he worked in a hushed office suite known as the God Pod, where a painting of a tiger hung behind his desk. Some employees nicknamed him “Iron A-s,” according to “Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American Power,” a 2012 book by the journalist Steve Coll.

Before Mr. Raymond became chief executive, his biggest public role was taking charge of the company’s response after the Exxon Valdez tanker ran aground on a reef in Alaska’s Prince William Sound in March 1989. The accident spilled 11 million gallons of crude and blackened 1,500 miles of coastline. Mr. Raymond, then Exxon’s president, oversaw the cleanup and, in 1991, helped negotiate a $1 billion settlement of federal and state legal charges arising from the spill. He accused environmentalists and politicians in Alaska of making the disaster worse by refusing to let Exxon spray chemical dispersants on the oil slick shortly after the spill.

In 1994, a federal jury in Anchorage ordered Exxon to pay $5 billion in punitive damages to about 34,000 fishermen and other Alaskans who said they were harmed by the spill. Exxon appealed, leading to another 14 years of litigation.

In a 2008 Supreme Court ruling, the damages were reduced to $500 million.
In the early 2000s, as BP and Chevron courted public favor by touting their investments in alternative energy sources, Exxon took a hard line against government restrictions on fossil fuels and funded research challenging the consensus on global warming.
Mr. Raymond, a former high school debating champion who had a Ph.D. degree in chemical engineering, considered himself a scientist with standing to question that consensus. In a 2005 interview with the public television host Charlie Rose, Mr. Raymond said there was a “natural variability” to temperatures on Earth over
millenniums. “If we weren’t here, the climate would change,” Mr. Raymond said. “It has to do with sunspots, it has to do with the wobble of the Earth, and it has — there are all kinds of things that come and go. If you talk to a geologist, he will tell you the Earth, over its history, has been much warmer than it is now and much colder.”

Because wind, solar and other alternative energy sources were costly and could not replace oil and gas in the near term, he argued, Exxon should focus on finding and pumping more oil, including, if possible, in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

Environmentalists regularly denounced Exxon. “There is a spectrum of corporate behavior on global warming and Exxon is the epitome of denial and deception,” Kert Davies, then the research director at Greenpeace USA, told The New York Times in 2005.

Mr. Raymond also resisted corporate trends toward greater acceptance of g-y rights. After Exxon acquired Mobil, the combined company rescinded Mobil policies banning discrimination on the basis of s-xual orientation and ended a practice of providing benefits to same-s-x partners. The moves prompted some g-y and le----n drivers to boycott Exxon service stations.

Under Mr. Raymond’s successor, Rex Tillerson, Exxon Mobil adopted more inclusive policies and acknowledged that human activity contributed to climate change.
Mr. Raymond seemed unbothered by the unpopularity of his views. “I’ve never had a focus group to decide what my persona is out there,” he told The Wall Street Journal in 1997.

Nor did he wish to discuss his personal life. During a court hearing on the Valdez oil spill in the 1990s, an Exxon lawyer asked Mr. Raymond to sum up his background. “I hope this doesn’t get too boring,” Mr. Raymond said. “It kind of bores me.”

Mr. Raymond, center, addressed shareholders during an Exxon annual meeting in 1989. Nine years later, he oversaw the agreement to acquire Mobil.

Lee Roy Raymond was born in Watertown, S.D., on Aug. 13, 1938. His father, Clifford, a railroad engineer, encouraged the young man’s studious ways. In the 1997 interview, Mr. Raymond recalled his father’s alluding to a lack of opportunities in South Dakota and saying, “You have to get an education and get out of here.” After excelling in high school debate and extemporaneous speaking, Mr. Raymond enrolled at the University of Wisconsin and graduated in 1960 with a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering.

He married Charlene Hocevar in 1961. They had three children, male triplets.
In addition to his wife and son Colin, he is survived by two other sons, John and Rob; and seven grandchildren. Mr. Raymond earned his doctorate in chemical engineering at the University of Minnesota in 1963 and joined Exxon the same year as a production research engineer in Tulsa, Okla. He later headed operations in Venezuela. In the mid-1970s, he impressed his bosses by turning an unprofitable refinery in Aruba into a
reliable source of profits.

After returning to the United States, he headed Exxon’s nuclear power business and oversaw the sale of a subsidiary selling office equipment, including Qyx electronic typewriters.

During his 12 years as chairman and chief executive, his compensation totaled more than $686 million, or $144,573 a day, according to an analysis done for The Times by Brian Foley, an independent compensation consultant.

That compensation amounted to “entrepreneurial returns for managerial conduct,” Charles M. Elson, a corporate governance scholar at the University of Delaware, told The Times in 2006. “Exxon was there long before Mr. Raymond was there and will be there long after he leaves. Yet he received Rockefeller returns without taking the Rockefeller risk.”

An Exxon Mobil spokesman at the time said Mr. Raymond’s performance justified his pay. Mr. Raymond was a director of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its predecessor, J.P. Morgan & Co., for 33 years before stepping down in 2020. He also was on the board of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington.

His hobbies included duck hunting and golf. In a 2013 interview with Investor’s Business Daily, he recalled having made three holes in one. On the corporate jet, he liked to drink milk with popcorn in it, Mr. Coll reported.

One of Mr. Raymond’s sons, John, co-founded Energy & Minerals Group, a private equity firm. “My father gave me three things,” John Raymond told The Journal in 2014. “He gave me work ethic, he gave me a good education and he gave me no money.”

Though Lee Raymond was known for his pugnacity, he had a softer side, according to Mr. Coll’s book: “He could be fiercely loyal to ExxonMobil colleagues and sometimes wept openly when subordinates faced illnesses or other personal struggles.”


ETIPS megathread

Starting a new thread to keep track of ETIPS layoffs. Layoffs coming for legacy applications, which application / department are you working with? Any layoff rumors? I am with a legacy CRM and we have no work. Pretty sure layoff are coming based on the way my manager is behaving... No meetings , no communication lately.


The Bank would have failed years ago…

Without the financial support of the rest of the organization, the bank would have ceased several years ago. This goes all the way back to General Joe, when the growth of the bank should have resulted in changes that were left ignored, resulting in the start of the consent orders. Then, through total mismanagement, the consent orders still remain after 6 years. Several large banks and insurance companies operate under a legacy IT structure even now, with all the downsides to that model. The bright idea of devolving back to that model here will undoubtedly ki-l the patient


Pension rip off if you don't take the lump sum.

I had a friend who passed away recently who was an exxon retiree. Their family lived into their nineties so he expected to live until at least 85. My friend retired at 61 with 40 years of service and chose the annuity. The annuity was huge and paid them nearly 50 percent of his yearly pay. The retiree expected to live at least 25 years and collect the pension but it was not the case. They only received 6 years pay from the annuity and had no relatives to leave as beneficiaries. If they would have taken the lump sum it could have been left to anyone as beneficiaries. Alight only allows spouses and children to be beneficiaries for the pension. He could have left the lump sum money to his nieces and nephews, friends or even a charity. He was in excellent health and would have lived to an old age but pancreatic cancer took him out. From the time of diagnosis to death was 5 months. Exxon and alight won. Don't make the same mistake as my old friend.


Focus on what you can control

Work life and adulting can feel terrifying if you try to control everything, especially if you are early to middle phase in your career. Continue to do great at your role, irrespective of larger organizational challenges. Take care of your health and family. If you can, mentor a newer employee to give you a sense of legacy. After all is said and done, it is what you are remembered for that will linger.


ASU+HPV

Never seen so many ppl with main character syndrome at Pearson. Execs trying to pretend they’re not two full moons from collecting their pension at the post office.

More buzzwords than brain cells. AI this, augmentation that - meanwhile they can’t even process a normal human interaction. “redefining the future of learning” but can’t u redefine how to not be insufferable first??

Walking around showing us inside a hotel conference room boarded up with some purple MDF 😂😂 This isn’t Homes Under The Hammer you plastic fool.

Stay humble y’all… or at least stay quiet, retire and hire someone younger who can make a product that sells for once.

Hope your family is proud of your business cosplay grift. What a legacy to leave them.


The Color Purple

The most important thing is to collect and destroy all the green crayons, replace them with purple crayons, then sell the devalued purple crayons to a company who wants used crayons and doesn’t have better ones

What is the sense in celebrating 147 years of a defunct company’s “legacy” while replacing all your “legacy” offerings with purple lipstick and nothing new except worse problems?

5 words: Technical Vision, Get Some Fast.


Breaking News: Franklin Templeton moves final phone skill back on...

Final date is 04/27/2026. Not all details have been published yet.

Great job to the FIS executive team, looking straight at you, VP Ian McCoy! Be sure to give notes to the Sales Team to sell this success to future clients! Let them know all of the steps that FIS took to achieve this result.

There are still legacy FT employees not hired back. All of that tenured talent wasted right down the drain.