#compliance

Posts mentioning hashtag #compliance

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #compliance.

Mention #compliance in your post to continue the discussion!

$85M

Cisco: $85M in Penalties Since 2000

According to Good Jobs First's Violation Tracker, Cisco Systems and companies currently under its ownership have accumulated approximately $85M in penalties across 8 cases since 2000.

Here's the breakdown:

Government contracting: $48M

  • 2010: $48M - False Claims Act case involving Cisco Systems and Westcon Group North America (DOJ)

Financial offenses: $20M

  • 2006: $20M - Accounting fraud or deficiencies involving Scientific-Atlanta (SEC)

Employment-related: $11.4M

  • 2009: $6.7M - Wage and hour violation (private state lawsuit)
  • 2017: $2.7M - Employment discrimination involving Splunk (U.S. Department of Labor, OFCCP)
  • 2020: $2M - Employment discrimination involving Cisco Systems (U.S. Department of Labor, OFCCP)

Consumer protection: $6M

  • 2019: $6M - Privacy violation (multiple government agencies)

Workplace safety: $10K

  • 2010: $5K - OSHA workplace safety violation
  • 2024: $5K - OSHA workplace safety violation

A few observations:

  • Roughly 56% of the total comes from a single $48M government contracting case.
  • The $11.4M in employment-related penalties is particularly relevant to Cisco employees, especially given ongoing discussions about layoffs, compensation, and management practices.
  • Two employment discrimination cases resulted in $4.7M in combined penalties.
  • Some cases involve subsidiaries or acquired companies, including Scientific-Atlanta and Splunk, and may predate Cisco's ownership.
  • These records span nearly two decades and don't necessarily reflect current practices.
  • The database includes private lawsuit settlements as well as government enforcement actions, so not every amount represents a government fine.

What interests me most are the $6.7M wage and hour case and the two employment discrimination cases totaling $4.7M. Did these settlements lead to meaningful changes in how Cisco treats its employees?

Source: Good Jobs First, Violation Tracker (2026)

https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/


Intel: $113M in Penalties Since 2000

According to Good Jobs First's Violation Tracker, Intel and companies currently under its ownership have accumulated approximately $113M in penalties across 9 cases since 2000.

Here's the breakdown:

Competition-related: $104M

  • 2015: $104M - Price-fixing or anti-competitive practices (private federal lawsuit)

Employment-related: $8.5M

  • 2018: $5M - Wage and hour violation (private state lawsuit)
  • 2019: $3.5M - Employment discrimination (U.S. Department of Labor, OFCCP)

Environmental: $213K

  • 2014: $143K - Oregon environmental violation
  • 2023: $31K - Oregon environmental violation
  • 2026: $39K - EPA environmental violation

Other violations: $155K

  • 2014: $144K - FCC telecommunications violation
  • 2017: $5K - OSHA workplace safety violation
  • 2013: $6K - FAA aviation safety violation

A few observations:

  • Roughly 92% of the total comes from a single competition-related case.
  • The $8.5M in employment-related penalties is arguably more relevant to Intel employees, particularly given ongoing discussions about compensation, layoffs, and management practices.
  • These cases span more than two decades and don't necessarily reflect current practices.
  • The database includes private lawsuit settlements as well as government enforcement actions, so not every amount represents a government fine.

What interests me most are the 2018 wage and hour case ($5M) and 2019 employment discrimination case ($3.5M). Did those settlements lead to any meaningful changes in how Intel treats its employees?

Source: Good Jobs First, Violation Tracker (2026)

https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/


Is Centene laying off again?

Inside Info. You decide.

Violation Tracker:
Current Parent Company Name: Centene
Ownership Structure: publicly traded (ticker symbol CNC)
Headquartered in: Missouri
Major Industry: healthcare services
Specific Industry: managed care
Penalty total since 2000 for companies currently owned: $1,963,691,795
Number of records: 255

https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/centene


SAS an AML transaction monitoring leader

As banks' compliance teams face a growing deluge of alerts, they need to distinguish suspicious from legitimate behavior quickly and confidently. Chartis Research has again named SAS a Category Leader in its AML Transaction Monitoring Solutions, 2026: Quadrant Update.

In Chartis' latest evaluation of the industry's 49 foremost providers of anti-money laundering solutions, SAS® Anti-Money Laundering on SAS® Viya® earned best-in-class ratings in four of the report's seven capability assessments.

Chartis also recognized SAS' advanced capabilities in workflow automation; solution packaging and deployment; and speed, volume and performance.


Not all folks are complying with RTO

My manager recently shared that CITI is presently being challenged with employees not RTO. So, how is this being enforced? You cannot single me out and terminate for showing up 2 days instead of 3 when there are hundreds or thousands ignoring this mandate completely.

So what’s is the plan here? Up to your division to manage?


DOL proposed rule to modernize PERM labor certification clears White House review

The Office of Management and Budget has cleared a Department of Labor proposed rule that could substantially update the PERM labor certification process, a key step in many employment-based green card cases. The proposal is expected to address recruitment standards, protections for U.S. workers affected by layoffs, and employer compliance requirements. However, the regulatory text has not yet been published, and the specific proposed requirements remain unknown. Current PERM regulations remain in effect. Employers with pending or planned PERM filings should monitor publication of the proposal and the subsequent public comment period.

This will scrutinize all H1B extensions and make it tougher to process. Huge win 🥇 for citizens of this country.


Compliance org layoff news??

So.... y'all told us about 8 weeks ago that the Compliance org cuts needed further review and we were told back then that in 6 weeks we would be hearing about the layoff decisions for our org. So.... dead silence, no updates, no communication. Anyone over here heard any updates from leadership yet? Any new timeline? We all know it's coming.... pretty cruel to keep us waiting to find out if we have a job or not. Especially practically right before the holidays now. And some of us noticed how the HR doc used to say if you made it to Oct 1 and then were laid off, you were entitled to your annual bonus. But the links on Workday that were sent with the assessment reminders clearly said if you are no longer employed on the date the bonus is distributed, you are ineligible to get it.... Would be nice to know what is happening to us in this org....


Centene, 760,000 Canceled Coverages, and a Few Questions from Congress

Late night, hot off the press information from your favorite “pompous windbag!” This absolutely could not wait until tomorrow. Here’s some news sure to get some opinions… please share yours!

Well, this is certainly interesting!

On October 27, thirteen U.S. senators, led by Ron Wyden and Bernie Sanders, launched a formal inquiry into ten major health insurers, including Centene, over their participation in a federal initiative that canceled approximately 315,000 ACA Marketplace enrollments covering more than 760,000 people.

CMS says the enrollments were unauthorized and estimates approximately $2.2 BILLION in recovered premium tax credits.

You might say, “Hey, this sounds like a victory against fraud, right?” But WAIT… Not so fast. According to the senators' inquiry, insurers cooperated with CMS by contacting members and requesting additional personal information, sometimes including Social Security numbers. Members who failed to respond were allegedly included in lists used to terminate coverage.

The senators question whether those actions complied with federal requirements governing midyear eligibility determinations.

And here's the particularly interesting part. CMS didn't update the relevant guidance until October 1. The coverage cancellations were effective August 31. The senators want to know what legal authority the insurers relied upon when they participated.

Now, fraud in the ACA Marketplace is a legitimate concern. Nobody should be defending fraudulent enrollments.

But here's a question:

Since when does not answering an unsolicited communication constitute proof of fraud?

No medical claims? Maybe the person was healthy. Zero-dollar premium? That's how subsidies work. Didn't respond to a request for personal information? Perhaps they thought it was a scam. None of those circumstances, by themselves, establishes that someone fraudulently obtained coverage.

And this is where Centene enters the picture.

Centene operates one of the nation's largest ACA Marketplace businesses.

Its own October 27 earnings release shows Marketplace membership declining from 5.83 million to 3.40 million year over year, a roughly 42% reduction.

To be clear, there's no evidence establishing how many of those departures resulted from this federal initiative. The 760,000 figure covers multiple insurers, not just Centene.

But that makes the next questions even more important.

Congress is asking insurers to explain:

  1. What evidence was used to identify supposedly unauthorized enrollments?

  2. Did insurers consider whether legitimate members might be wrongly terminated?

  3. How many affected members subsequently sought reinstatement or submitted medical claims?

  4. Were children included in the termination lists?

  5. Did the companies evaluate the legal basis for CMS's requests before cooperating?

  6. Are they participating in another round of terminations?

Centene has until November 6 to respond to the inquiry.

And here's what I'd really like to know. Centene requires its employees to complete annual Compliance, Ethics, and Fraud, Waste & Abuse training.

We were taught to recognize suspicious activity, follow established procedures, document decisions, and escalate concerns. So what did Centene's own Compliance and Legal teams conclude about the evidence and procedures behind these cancellations? Did they independently evaluate the risk of terminating legitimate members? Or did they simply rely on CMS's assurances?

We don't know. That's why Congress is asking. And no, a congressional inquiry isn't proof that Centene broke the law. But the distinction between suspected fraud and proven fraud matters enormously when the consequence is losing health insurance… talk about “changing lives” amirite? But hey… margin.

Here's the bottom line.

If an insurer can help remove someone from coverage based on questionable indicators, who is responsible for proving the decision was justified? CMS? The insurance company? The broker? Or does the burden somehow fall on the person who just discovered they no longer have health insurance?

Fraud prevention requires evidence. So does accountability.

And if we're going to terminate someone's healthcare coverage in the name of protecting taxpayers, perhaps demonstrating that the person actually did something wrong shouldn't be an optional step. But hey, at least somebody is asking the questions!

SOURCES:

U.S. Senate — October 27, 2026
Wyden, Sanders and 11 Senate colleagues announce inquiry into ten insurers, including Centene:
https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-sanders-senate-democrats-call-out-insurance-company-collusion-with-trump-administration-to-kick-thousands-of-americans-off-health-insurance

CMS — September 22, 2026
Federal Marketplace Anti-Fraud Actions:
https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/federal-marketplace-ffe-sbe-fp-anti-fraud-actions

Centene — October 27, 2026
Q3 2026 earnings and Marketplace membership:
https://investors.centene.com/2026-10-27-CENTENE-CORPORATION-REPORTS-THIRD-QUARTER-2026-RESULTS

Fierce Healthcare — October 27, 2026
Democratic senators probe insurers' role in canceling ACA coverage for 760K:
https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/democratic-senators-probe-insurers-role-canceling-aca-coverage-760k


How to report to department of defense when pII has been sent to a foreign entity by a health insurance corporation 

Reporting the unauthorized exposure of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) to a foreign entity involves distinct pathways depending on whether you are the insurance contractor (corporate reporting) or an individual/whistleblower (public reporting).

  1. Mandatory Corporate Reporting (If you represent the insurer)
    If the health insurance corporation holds a contract with the Department of Defense (such as a TRICARE managed care contractor or a vendor bound by DFARS 252.204-7012), the organization is legally mandated to report the incident immediately.
  • Cyber Incident Reporting via DIBNet: The corporation must report the incident electronically within 72 hours of discovery via the DoD DIBNet Portal.

https://www.dc3.mil/Missions/DIB-Cybersecurity/DIB-Cybersecurity-DCISE/

  • This requires a DoD-approved Medium Assurance Certificate.
  • Privacy Act / PII Breach Reporting: Simultaneously, the contractor must coordinate with their Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and submit DD Form 2959 (Breach of Personally Identifiable Information Report) to the component’s privacy office. DoD guidelines generally require an initial alert to the federal team within 1 hour of discovery.
  • Defense Health Agency (DHA): For healthcare data, the corporate privacy official should immediately contact the Defense Health Agency Privacy and Civil Liberties Office to manage Military Health System data breaches.
  1. Whistleblower and Public Reporting (If you are an employee or citizen)
    If you are an individual exposing corporate wrongdoing or an illegal transfer of sensitive DoD data to a foreign nation, you should route the report through oversight and counterintelligence bodies:
  • DoD Inspector General (OIG) Hotline: File an unclassified complaint regarding corporate mismanagement, systematic information loss, or regulatory violations via the DoD IG Hotlineor by calling 1-800-424-9098.
  • Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA): Because a foreign entity is involved, this escalates the incident beyond a standard data breach into a potential national security concern. If you have security clearance or work within the defense industrial base, report the foreign contact or exploitation target immediately to your Facility Security Officer (FSO) or directly to the DCSA Reporting Channels.

https://www.dcsa.mil/Personnel-Vetting/Background-Investigations-for-Applicants/Report-a-Security-Change-Concern-or-Threat/

  1. Parallel Legal Requirements
    Because the entity is a health insurance corporation, standard healthcare laws apply alongside defense regulations:
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR): The breach must be reported to the Department of Health and Human Services through the HHS Breach Portal.

https://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_frontpage.jsf?faces-redirect=true

  • If the breach affects 500 or more individuals, it must be reported within 60 days.

There is no 4 out of 6 week chart!!

The keyword is “rolling”. A rolling six-week period is a continuous, moving window of six weeks, where the oldest week drops off as a new week is added, often used for tracking attendance or compliance. This differs from a fixed six-week block because the period is constantly updating.


Subject: Systemic Governance Risk: Executive Enrichment, Structural Double Standards, and the Failure of Core Corporate Values

https://dell.service-now.com/arc?id=arc_catalog_item&sys_id=db988ba7475ade10c2164511516d43e7

Statement of Misalignment and Systemic Risk:
This submission highlights an insurmountable contradiction between Dell Technologies’ publicly stated corporate values, its compliance enforcement, and its executive compensation practices over the 5-year reporting period (FY 2022 through FY 2026).

  1. Wealth Disparity: Median Pay vs. Executive Holdings & Dividend Cash Flow

In official SEC filings (DEF 14A), Dell reports a median employee annual compensation of $78,796. Juxtaposing this baseline against executive capital growth and quarterly passive income reveals the extreme magnitude of internal wealth divergence:

Lifetime Earnings vs. 5-Year Capital Growth:
Average Employee Career: Working a full 40-year career at Dell’s median annual wage yields $3.15 Million in gross lifetime earnings.

Jeff Clarke (COO & Vice Chair): Generated an estimated +$592.09 Million in 5-year capital growth (reaching an estimated holding value of ~$825M on grants worth $232.91M at award). This capital gain represents 188 times an average employee's total 40-year career earnings.

William Scannell (Pres., Global Sales): Generated an estimated +$254.92 Million in 5-year capital growth (~$308M total value) — 81 times a median employee's lifetime earnings.

Richard Rothberg (General Counsel) & Yvonne McGill (CFO): Generated 5-year capital gains of +$191.70 Million (61x lifetime earnings) and +$48.16 Million (15x lifetime earnings) respectively.

Passive Dividend Generation: At Dell’s current quarterly dividend rate of $0.63 per share, executive stock holdings yield massive passive quarterly cash flow: Holding ~1.65 million shares and equivalents, Jeff Clarke generates an estimated ~$1.04 Million in cash payouts every single quarter in dividends alone. A single quarterly dividend check to the COO exceeds 13 years of full-time gross wages for an average Dell employee.

  1. Performative Values vs. Downsizing as Risk Offloading

Dell frequently cites core principles such as "Winning Together" and "Doing the Right Thing." However, SEC filings confirm that "winning" is an asymmetric outcome reserved exclusively for equity-holding officers, while financial risk is transferred entirely to non-equity-bearing workers:

FY 2024: 13,000 jobs eliminated
FY 2025: 12,000 jobs eliminated
FY 2026: 11,000 jobs eliminated

5-Year Aggregate: 36,000 workforce positions eliminated;a 27% total net reduction.

When strategic missteps occur, executives bear no personal financial consequences—insulating themselves through title reorganizations and board-sanctioned grant adjustments. Instead, 36,000 workers lost their livelihoods while remaining employees absorbed wage compression and operational burnout.

  1. Passive Competitive Tracking vs. Structural Wage Suppression

While Dell publicly frames itself as an industry leader, operational pay decisions reveal a pattern of passive competitive tracking when addressing rank-and-file compensation.

During a past corporate all-hands meeting, when executive leadership was questioned regarding wage adjustments to match compounding inflation, the official response was that "no competitors have announced plans for such adjustments, so Dell will not either." Selectively invoking market competition to suppress wage growth while claiming industry leadership represents a clear operational contradiction. Workers are left with below-inflation raises, while their primary "reward" for high performance is simply avoiding the next layoff cycle- maybe.

  1. Incentive Misalignment & Compliance Double Standards
    Dell’s compensation model systematically limits wealth accumulation for non-executive employees:

Discretionary Cash Bonuses: Cash bonuses do not compound into base pay over time, are taxed at supplemental income rates, and give managers insufficient budget to retain top technical talent.

Equity Exclusion: While leadership argues that executive stock awards are necessary to incentivize innovation, withholding broad-based equity from rank-and-file workers directly contradicts this logic. If equity drives performance, excluding the workforce actively suppresses long-term value.

Compliance Asymmetry: Dell’s Code of Conduct strictly enforces gift bans and conflict-of-interest policies on frontline workers to eliminate even the "mere appearance of impropriety." Enforcing strict penalties on employees for minor administrative issues while board structures enable executives to extract hundreds of millions of dollars by eliminating 36,000 livelihoods creates an institutional double standard that destroys internal trust.

Action Requested:

This report requests that the Audit Committee, Compliance Officers, and the Compensation Committee of Dell’s Board of Directors:

Formally evaluate the reputational and cultural risks of executive equity structures tied to workforce reductions.

Recognize layoffs as a FAILURE of leadership and punish it accordingly.

Address the structural double standard between frontline compliance enforcement and executive enrichment.

Re-examine employee compensation models to align actual practices with public statements on corporate values and leadership.


JTA Faces Scrutiny Over Layoff Procedures

The Jacksonville Transportation Authority failed to provide veterans with the mandated 60-day notice before recent layoffs. This oversight contradicts the authority's established veterans preference policy. A spokesperson for the JTA confirmed this procedural lapse. The implications of this policy violation are currently under review. This situation raises questions about the JTA's adherence to its own internal guidelines.

Jacksonville, Florida

https://www.firstcoastnews.com/video/news/local/jta-did-not-provide-veterans-with-required-60-day-layoff-notice/77-f71d2be8-8e42-4556-a946-2dad0897db5f


US regulator accuses nation's largest banks of debanking customers over political views

The head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) declared Wednesday that his agency uncovered "irrefutable evidence that the nation's largest banks have denied, debanked and discriminated against customers and lawful businesses," including over political views.

Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould made the remark after the OCC said it investigated debanking activities at the nine largest banks it supervises: JPMorgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo Bank, U.S. Bank, Capital One, PNC Bank, TD Bank and BMO Bank. The practice of debanking is the denial, restriction or closure of an individual’s or organization’s access to banking services.

The 47-page OCC report found that in February 2021, under the Biden administration, "a payment processor owned by one bank closed the account of a merchant that sold merchandise promoting President Trump and the Make America Great Again (MAGA) brand." And two years later, "one bank declined to provide financial services to a public education organization due to its partisan leanings — namely, the organization’s political arm’s endorsement of solely Democratic candidates."

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/us-regulator-accuses-nations-largest-banks-debanking-customers-over-political-views


Bank of America $1.2B Loss Sanctions Operations - Impact on BNY?

News of BAC's $1.2B loss hit the wires two nights ago. Did this news rattle operations at BNY? BNY has a large operating presence when it comes to sanctions screening. Senior Management, along with Heads of Compliance and Sanctions Operations, must have taken note of what happened as this is the third largest penalty ever imposed on any business with sanctions/money laundering violations. Operations, particularly with sanctions-oriented processes involving FinCEN and OFAC, have continually experienced losses in personnel from various US sites. Many knowledgeable employees in departments associated with Compliance and Operations, have been let go. The replacements are coming from offshore sites, primarily India. Hiring is cheap but the overall work is, and always has been, below average. Management shouldn't shrug off this fine as nothing. They should focus on happened to BAC and ensure it doesn't happen to them.


CoinMe to Cease Washington State Crypto Kiosk Operations

Washington State has reached a settlement with CoinMe, a Seattle-based cryptocurrency firm. The agreement mandates CoinMe to shut down all its cryptocurrency kiosks across the state by the end of the year. This action follows an examination that identified non-compliance with net worth requirements, poor accounting, and a deficient BSA/AML program. CoinMe will also pay $2.5 million in penalties and undergo an independent compliance review. Coinstar machines will remain operational.

Seattle, Washington

https://newstalk870.am/well-known-crypto-kiosks-going-away-in-washington-state/


Pennsylvania Businesses Remove Skill Games

Small businesses and distributors across Pennsylvania are scrambling to remove skill games from store floors before a court-ordered deadline. Failure to comply will result in seizure by law enforcement. This action follows the state legislature's inability to reach a regulatory agreement. Local distributors like DeLeo Games are working to retrieve hundreds of devices from area establishments. The sudden enforcement has led to immediate unemployment for workers and financial strain for business owners.

Altoona, Pennsylvania

https://www.wtaj.com/news/local-news/altoona-workers-face-layoffs-as-hundreds-of-skill-games-are-pulled/


This is it. Report All H1B and L1B fraud now............

Trump administration has suspended green-card processing for several major technology and IT companies, accusing them of abusing immigration programs and displacing American workers.

Microsoft, Adobe, Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL and Capgemini..........and the list is gowing......


Intuit should also be banned from green card labor program

Just like Adobe was banned today regarding the green card ban, Intuit should’ve also been on that list as well.

Look at the engineer org, pick any manager, look at the team he/she has. It’s not a coincidence, we hired around 8-10 ppl in the past 2-3 months. All were on visa.

Also I’m too afraid to report any of that to HR so spilling my guts here.


Suspension

Federal scrutiny of employment-based immigration has reached some of the largest technology employers in the country. The Labor Department is suspending PERM processing for Wipro, Microsoft, Capgemini, TCS, Cognizant, Adobe, HCL and Infosys, citing alleged program abuses and investigations.

https://www.clarin.com/us-news/will-h-1b-holders-be-deported-what-to-know-as-the-us-suspends-microsoft-and-adobe-from-green-card-labor-program_0_09ruWtaBzV.html


Slow down...

The U.S. Department of Labor announced that PERM labor certification processing has been suspended for eight technology and IT services companies: Capgemini, Infosys, Adobe, HCL Technologies, Microsoft, Tata Consultancy Services, Cognizant and Wipro. The suspension covers both new and pending applications.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/6136675-vance-suspends-microsoft-perm/


OK, here it goes - no more visas 4 u

The US DoL announced that PERM labor certification processing has been suspended for eight technology and IT services companies: Capgemini, Infosys, Adobe, HCL Technologies, Microsoft, Tata Consultancy Services, Cognizant and Wipro. The suspension covers both new and pending applications.

https://www.newsweek.com/green-card-update-trump-admin-blocks-tech-companies-h1b-perm-program-microsoft-adobe-12541853


Visas

That'd be it. Stop the abuse. Finally. It's all over the news... "The U.S. Department of Labor announced that PERM labor certification processing has been suspended for eight technology and IT services companies: Capgemini, Infosys, Adobe, HCL Technologies, Microsoft, Tata Consultancy Services, Cognizant and Wipro. The suspension covers both new and pending applications."


Breaking News: Big immigration news for the tech industry

Big immigration news for the tech industry today. The Department of Labor has frozen PERM applications involving eight major companies, including Wipro, Cognizant, Adobe, Infosys, Capgemini, Microsoft, HCL and TCS. Both new submissions and pending applications are affected.


DOL steps on visa on brakes

The Trump administration has suspended Infosys, Adobe, HCL, Microsoft, Wipro, Cognizant, Capgemini and TCS from the PERM labor certification program. The decision blocks new and pending labor certification applications involving these companies, affecting a key step in the employment-based green card process.

https://www.reuters.com/business/us-suspending-permanent-residency-program-for-microsoft-vance-says-2026-10-08/


Why is DELL not part of the JD VANCE H1B Action agaist Microsoft Adobe and others?

Here is the direct comparison of the layoff and green card (PERM) application data that explains why Microsoft and Adobe were targeted by the government's recent suspension while Dell was excluded:

Microsoft
Layoffs (2025/2026): 6,000 American workers laid off.
H-1B & Green Card Sponsorships: Obtained 6,300 new H-1B visas and applied for nearly 3,000 green cards during the same period.
Government Status: Suspended

Adobe
Layoffs (2025/2026): No mass corporate layoff (net headcount actually grew by ~650), but targeted role cuts occurred.
H-1B & Green Card Sponsorships: Filed 3,682 PERM applications, 1,000 of which the government claims overlapped with positions of workers who were laid off.
Government Status: Suspended

Dell
Layoffs (2025/2026): ~11,000 overall workers laid off.
H-1B & Green Card Sponsorships: Filed 0 new PERM applications in 2025.
Government Status: Not Suspended
Very Large outsource workforce in India


PERM Program Suspensions

The Department of Labor has suspended eight major technology and IT outsourcing firms from participating in the PERM program, which allows companies to sponsor foreign workers for U.S. green cards. The affected companies include Microsoft, Adobe, Cognizant, Infosys, TCS, Wipro, HCL and Capgemini.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nri/work/cognizant-infosys-tata-wipro-hcl-among-8-it-firms-suspended-from-us-green-card-programme/articleshow/134795461.cms?from=mdr


The Grand Jury Report Is Gone. The Money Trail Isn’t.

Well, holy shiatballs NoCenteam Nation!!!

Yesterday, Florida's First District Court of Appeal ordered the entire 116-page Hope Florida grand jury report expunged! The grand jury had called the movement of $10 million from Centene's Medicaid settlement a "sophisticated scheme" and said the money was misappropriated. The appellate court basically said not so fast nope: the grand jury could not declare conduct unlawful, name people responsible, decline to indict them, and then publish the accusations anyway. It also found serious disclosure problems and concluded that the $10 million was not an identified Medicaid overcharge and never became State of Florida property.[1]

That's a big deal. If we've cited the grand jury as proof somebody committed a crime, that part just got blown up. No indictments were returned, the appellate court rejected the report's central legal theory, and the ruling expressly says third-party settlement payments like this were not prohibited by the Florida statutes the grand jury relied upon.[1]

But here's where this gets a he-l of a lot more interesting. The court ordered the report expunged. It did not erase the transaction. Centene's original settlement draft sent the entire roughly $67 million to Florida. Then AHCA briefed the governor's office on September 10, 2024. The next day a new draft contained a $5 million Hope Florida payment. On September 12 that payment got a special seven-day deadline while Florida could wait up to 45 days for its first payment. On September 13 the Hope Florida amount doubled to $10 million, with no explanation in the email record for why. Florida's own Chief Deputy Attorney General wrote that the payment section was "different than I have seen in a settlement with Medicaid monies."[2]

And Centene's lawyers weren't asleep at the wheel. They inserted language making clear Centene was "directed by the state" to make the payment and that Centene had no authority over the state's allocation or subsequent distribution of the settlement money.[3]

(That's actually pretty smart lawyering.)

More importantly, Centene's lawyers clearly considered the payment's authorization important enough to negotiate specific protections around it.

So here's the question nobody should let disappear just because the grand jury report did:

What did Centene's Legal, Compliance, executive leadership, and anyone responsible for government-contract risk actually review before approving this?

Because as we discussed in my last post, Centene tells employees that "Compliance is Everyone's Responsibility." It requires ethics and compliance training at hire and annually. Every employee completes annual Fraud, Waste and Abuse training. We were quizzed and had to attest to it. Very thoroughly, I might add! The company says employees should be vigilant, think critically, report concerns, and protect taxpayer dollars. They really love that part and hammer it home in multiple areas. Centene even tells CMS that MCOs need better information sharing so they can eliminate fraud blind spots.[4][5]

So here's a pretty simple governance question:

How much scrutiny does a $10 million politically sensitive settlement payment go through?

It gets better.

Florida officials have confirmed that when the state calculated what it owed the federal government from the settlement, it used the full $67 million, including the $10 million sent directly to Hope Florida.[6]

So follow this carefully:

For federal Medicaid settlement accounting, Florida treated the full $67 million as the basis for reimbursement.

BUT...

The appellate court says the $10 million sent to Hope Florida never became public money.[1][6]

Those two things may have a completely legitimate legal explanation. Federal Medicaid accounting rules and Florida property law are not necessarily the same thing.

Great. Somebody please take the mic and explain it.

Because "legal under this Florida statute" and "nothing to see here" are not remotely the same sentence.

Then there's what happened next. Hope Florida sent the $10 million to two nonprofits. Those nonprofits subsequently sent $8.5 million to Keep Florida Clean, the political committee fighting Amendment 3.[2] Centene says it had "no part in or knowledge of" Hope Florida's subsequent use of the money, and I have seen no evidence proving otherwise.[3]

That distinction really matters here.

So don't accuse Centene of secretly funding a political campaign. The evidence doesn't establish that.

Ask the much harder question:

Why did one of America's largest Medicaid contractors agree to an unusual $10 million third-party payment inside a Medicaid settlement, what diligence was performed, who signed off internally, and what documentation exists showing the risk was reviewed?

And now the process used to challenge and ultimately expunge the grand jury report is generating its own questions.

Florida Trident reports that the appeal which eliminated the report proceeded with no party arguing in defense of the report, while taxpayers have paid more than $300,000 to two law firms involved in the grand-jury matter, plus additional publicly funded legal work by a third firm. The ruling arrived 27 days before Attorney General James Uthmeier's election and is not final until any rehearing proceedings are resolved.[7]

That does prove political interference not prove political interference.

But if you're a reporter, legislator, auditor, shareholder, or analyst, you'd have to be working pretty hard not to have follow-up questions.

And don't forget the IRS!

The IRS Whistleblower Office has acknowledged a submission concerning the Hope Florida money trail and assigned it a claim number. That does not mean the IRS has opened an examination, much less found wrongdoing. But federal tax questions surrounding the foundation are separate from the Florida appellate court's ruling and remain unresolved.[8]

Which brings us to Wall Street...

CNC is trading around $65, roughly 7% below its September 52-week high. There is no evidence the market is pricing Hope Florida as a material financial event today. Frankly, investors have bigger immediate concerns: Medicaid margins, Marketplace risk, Medicare retrenchment, membership losses, and hundreds of millions in restructuring expenses.

Centene has told investors it expects roughly $315-$365 million of additional severance costs during the remainder of 2026, on top of enterprise-optimization and contract-exit costs already incurred. Q2 Medicaid HBR was 93.9%. Management nevertheless raised 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to greater than $4.80.[9]

And Centene reports Q3 earnings on October 27 at 8:30 a.m. ET.[10]

So, analysts, here's some free homework before everybody asks another question about basis points:

1. Did Centene's Audit and Compliance, Quality and Compliance, or any other board-level committee review the Hope Florida settlement or its $10 million third-party payment?

2. What internal compliance, legal, reputational-risk, or government-affairs review was performed before Centene agreed to the Hope Florida provision?

3. Who inside Centene had final authority to approve an unusual third-party payment in a settlement involving one of its largest Medicaid states?

4. Has Centene received any subpoena, inquiry, document request, whistleblower-related communication, or other contact from the IRS, DOJ, HHS OIG, CMS, Florida officials, or any other authority concerning Hope Florida?

5. Has the company determined that no disclosure relating to this matter is required under its SEC risk-factor, litigation, regulatory, or contingency obligations? If so, why?

6. With hundreds of millions being spent on severance and "enterprise optimization," what controls are in place to make sure institutional compliance knowledge isn't walking out the door while Centene simultaneously asks regulators for greater authority to police everyone else's fraud, waste, and abuse?

That last one matters beyond Florida.

Centene's own 2026 shareholder materials say:

"We do what is right, not what is easy."[11]

Centene also says "Every dollar lost to FWA is a dollar unavailable for member care."[5]

Those are pretty strong standards.

And to be crystal clear, the appellate court did NOT find that Centene misdirected funds, knowingly financed political activity, or participated in an illegal scheme. Neither am I saying that.

I'm pointing out the gap between Centene's very public emphasis on compliance, transparency, FWA controls, and protecting taxpayer dollars and the unanswered questions surrounding an unusual $10 million third-party provision in a Medicaid settlement.

Maybe Centene's controls worked perfectly.

Maybe Legal documented every concern.

Maybe Compliance blessed it.

Maybe leadership asked exactly the right questions and concluded the payment was appropriate.

Fantastic.

Then this should be the easiest question Sarah London gets all quarter:

Who reviewed the $10 million, what did they conclude, and will Centene show its work?

Because after all the annual FWA training, ethics modules, SIU investigations, accountability speeches, layoffs, optimization, and lectures about protecting taxpayer dollars...

Compliance is Everyone's Responsibility.

Apparently transparency should be, too.

[1] Florida First District Court of Appeal, In re: Leon County Grand Jury Presentment, Fall of 2025, No. 1D2026-2435, Oct. 7, 2026.

[2] Florida Trident, "Hope Florida timeline: Tracing the $10 million," Oct. 2026; underlying AHCA, Attorney General, and settlement drafting records.

[3] Miami Herald/Tampa Bay Times reporting on newly released settlement drafts and Centene's "directed by the state" language; Centene settlement agreement.

[4] Centene Code of Conduct and Ethics & Compliance materials: annual FWA training, reporting obligations, ethical decision-making, and "Compliance is Everyone's Responsibility."

[5] Centene, "Combating Fraud, Waste and Abuse"; Centene's Feb. 25, 2026 FWA reform letter to CMS.

[6] PolitiFact, Aug. 13, 2026: Florida officials confirmed federal reimbursement was calculated using the full $67 million settlement.

[7] Florida Trident, Oct. 8, 2026: appellate proceeding, taxpayer-funded legal invoices, and absence of an adversary defending the report.

[8] Florida Trident/WUSF, Oct. 2, 2026: IRS Whistleblower Office acknowledgment concerning the Hope Florida transactions.

[9] Centene Q2 2026 Form 10-Q and earnings release.

[10] Centene Investor Relations: Q3 2026 earnings call scheduled Oct. 27, 2026, 8:30 a.m. ET.

[11] Centene 2026 Proxy Statement/2025 Annual Report.


USDOL NEWS • BOMBSHELL

“Today, the U.S. Labor Department froze the PERM green card program for Microsoft, Adobe, Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Capgemini over allegations of VISA FRAUD and DISPLACING LAID-OFF American workers.

The government will no longer accept or process green card applications from these firms. This freeze cuts off any current visa worker’s pathway to permanent residency, which will cause many high-skilled foreign engineers to leave these companies.”

Comcast uses all 8 of these companies. Fraud? The impact of this may be enormous.