#accountability

It really is amazing the lack of C Level /VP level of accountability over the years.

AOL, RedBox, bluejeans and now $47M FCC location privacy. For years employees drilled on CPNI.

Board d Member sats Hans needed to be fired immediately after 8 years of deckining stock price and net adds.

SCOTUS rules 8-1 and zero Vz accountability.

Yet if an ethical Vz sales person misses monthly targets.. 60 day PIP and fired.

There is zero hope under current Vz C Levels Verizon succeeds.

Next play is divest business units and watch C Levels all cash out $3M in stock options. Already happening.

Are we missing the obvious? The administration gives FB government positions with the IRS and SSA, enabling him to sell his Fiserv shares while they are high without liability for insider trading. FB then returns the favor, blocking the IRS from investigating the administration. Simple. Perfect.

Laptops in the company still have attuids assigned to their computer name. Use ADUC or the PowerShell activedirectory module to search for computers belonging to anyone in your leadership chain. Once you find their computer, you'll want to perform a ping on their computer name, followed by nslookup to see which domain controller they are connected to. It will tell you if they are connected to VPN and are therefore not in the office.

Subsequently, make a PowerShell script that automates this whole process, and now you have a way to track RTO compliance of executives. You can run it every 20 minutes to track who is doing less than 8 hours in the office.

Once you find someone, lodge a complaint with HR indicating that you believe they are violating RTO policy.

Read the GAO Report on Accenture's botched takeover of the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). GAO-24-106319. Everything in it is a page right out of the transition to FIS. Except then, we had iron clad procedures in place & they were all working before the transfer. Now, everything is on the fly, process hadn't been updated for years, and 9 month transition is a MASS-IVe failure in the making.

**'But AFS (Accenture) Federal Services completely botched the migration of TSP’s services due to an array of technological and staffing shortfalls that have virtually brought the services offered by TSP to participants to a screeching halt.

1. Despite AFS’ promise to “improve the customer experience,” AFS Managing
   Director Owen Davies admitted that AFS “made that process really cumbersome, it was very hard for a vast number of users,” and that “[w]e made it overly complex.”**

The ExxonMobil Operations Integrity Management System (OIMS) is a comprehensive framework designed to manage safety, security, health, and environmental risks across the organization, ensuring operational excellence and continuous improvement.

Purpose and Importance
The OIMS framework establishes common expectations for managing the inherent risks associated with ExxonMobil's operations. It emphasizes the importance of Operations Integrity (OI), which encompasses all aspects of the business that can impact personnel safety, process safety, security, health, and environmental performance. The system is integral to ExxonMobil's commitment to conducting business responsibly and sustainably, ensuring that safety and environmental considerations are prioritized in all operations.

Key Components of OIMS
11 Elements of OIMS: The framework consists of 11 key elements that guide the implementation of effective management systems. These elements include:

(1) Management Leadership, Commitment, and Accountability
(2) Risk Assessment and Management
(3) Facilities Design and Construction
(4) Information/Documentation
(5) Personnel and Training
(6) Operations and Maintenance
(7) Management of Change
(8) Third-Party Services
(9) Incident Investigation and Analysis
(10) Community Awareness and Emergency Preparedness
(11) Operations Integrity Assessment and Improvement

Continuous Improvement: OIMS is designed to be a dynamic framework that is periodically updated to reflect new insights and best practices. This includes strengthening expectations related to leadership, environmental performance, and behavior-based safety

Commitment to Safety: ExxonMobil promotes a culture where all employees and contractors are responsible for managing risks and ensuring safety. The framework encourages personal accountability and proactive intervention to prevent incidents, aligning with the company's vision of a workplace where "Nobody Gets Hurt"

Implementation and Evaluation
The application of the OIMS framework is mandatory across all ExxonMobil operations, with a focus on design, construction, and operational phases. Management is responsible for ensuring that systems are in place and effective, with ongoing evaluations to assess compliance with the framework's expectations. This includes internal and external assessments to gauge the effectiveness of the OIMS implementation .

In summary, ExxonMobil's OIMS is a critical component of its operational strategy, aimed at enhancing safety, environmental stewardship, and overall operational integrity through structured management practices and continuous improvement efforts.

The U.S. Justice Department has reportedly sent subpoenas to several of the country’s largest banks, including JPMorgan Chase JPM and Bank of America BAC, over allegations of politically motivated account closures.

Other banks under investigation include Wells Fargo WFC.

Some of the subpoenas were issued to the banks last year by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., led by Jeanine Pirro. The probe is focused on claims that these banks have “debanked” clients, meaning they have inappropriately closed customer accounts due to political reasons, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/jpmorgan-bofa-wells-fargo-subpoenaed-by-doj-in-trumps-explosive-debanking-crackdown-report/ar-AA25nPc6

The only FAST thing that is happening is that as a result of their direction they are wasting company resources on initiatives with no return. In fact not only do they cost us money the things and processes they building attempting to build are making things worse.

Anyone have any thoughts? The guy that "was" in charge of all the cores and is now a segment head is always missing in action. How are we supposed to fix the leakage problems if SVPs are not held accountable? We all have our head buried in the sand thinking problems will go away. Such a mess.

EH built a huge ticker out front counting down the World Cup and you couldn’t manage to make your shoes different colors than the competitors? It’s literally a sea of pink cleats, impossible to set apart the brands. Nike in a nutshell, who is to blame? Should the color team be accountable? The head of global football? Where is the ticker to determine how many more days we have to watch this embarrassment?

M@rk, Kev, and Sean,

You can go to all the conferences and spin the story how you want, but it is not working. Results speak louder than spin. Investors are not buying it.

What a waste. Millions and millions of dollars. Same issues, thousands of incidents. Thanks tech leaders. Your message of automation for the issues vs root cause is ridiculous.
Also - what again is sre embedded doing vs asking for status of incidents?
From what I hear their leaders have told them to wait as they have no idea what to do either.
This reorganization is yet to make sense. Fast but no clear direction for teams.
Also, AB seems like a real di-k.

If you work on a control team, your days are numbered. Work that can’t be automated by AI is being shifted to business accountability people. Huge effort to get rid of most controls. Nothing left for anyone to do.

$38.57 and $82.74, these are critical factors in a stock's performance. It's one of the quickest and easiest ways to evaluate stock performance. Everyone gets this one. Evidently, the board does not. There is only person bearing the responsibility here.

Content and technology company Thomson Reuters faces a shareholder vote at its annual meeting on Wednesday over its U.S. government contracts for services that some investors and employees say may help power the Trump administration’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/thomson-reuters-faces-shareholder-vote-over-ice-contracts-2026-06-10/

Company and management expects excellence but the company can't even pay you correctly or resolve a pay issue within a 6 month time span. And then they tell you you're the problem for trying to solve your own problem since no one will actually help you resolve issues.

The most difficult part about working for this company is dealing with the company itself.

As an Intuit employee I lost all my savings on Intuit stocks. I hold him accountable.

Is it really the elephant in the room anymore? Is it a value add when you just create extra work to validate your existence and add work to teams that are already understaffed? We all know it’s to validate the existence of SB but this is just getting out of hand. Every week they recreate work that our teams are already doing. We have to pivot and adjust to keep up with this nonsense. WE don’t want your “help.” They create processes that aren’t efficient just to “look busy.” BTW - we have a procurement team that will manage POs from start to finish. In fact they do this for the ENTIRE company. I prefer to go to them! It’s simple. So why does SB want to hoard unnecessary work that creates a layer for everyone else? One guess - JM could never admit that her team doesn’t add any value. Instead we all have to drop what we are doing when they pull something new and inefficient out of their hat. They’ve run out of work and now they are digging for things. Get over it! Admit the work is fake and you are trying to take other peoples work to make yourself look “busy.” Insert eye roll here!

I am so tired of getting blamed for projects that went wrong because management approved bad plans.

What are waiting for and why are you so passive? Shareholders have been wiped out and you seem like all is fine. Not it is not! There is one scoreboard for a public company and you are losing. You will be out of a job at some point unless you take decisive action. This company need to be broken up into to pieces (Merchant and FI). Your team is not capable of dealing with the size and complexity as it is comprised today.

Our manager just sits there nodding while other teams blame us for everything. No pushback, no defense of our work, just silence while we take the hit. I mean, he looks bad in the whole thing as well, he should at least care about that. But nope, just lets it happen.

Staying quiet when someone stole my credit cost me a promotion and I regret it every day.

The disaster starts with our OD. He is out of touch. He is only a numbers manager and unable to lead. Does not have competency to lead. Blames everyone else for his failures. He is the common denominator. Unable to take responsibility and accountability. His answer is always to fire someone else or ask someone to be fired. We need a new OD.

One upper management leader once mentioned that competitors (Cadence) were more efficient. A few colleagues who once worked at Cadence also said the same. Why? Have our leaders thought about the underlying reason, or they know the answer but they can't change since such reform will damage their own benefits?

I am writing this to explain to the rest of Verizon about a pervasive and ongoing culture of discrimination, hostility, and bias within our workplace that directly violates standard conduct and zero-tolerance policies. Throughout my tenure, I have routinely witnessed and been subjected to an unsustainable environment where discussions surrounding race are treated contentiously and divisively. Furthermore, the workplace culture frequently involves highly offensive and inappropriate language, including racial slurs, antisemitic remarks, and derogatory comments targeted at various ethnic and cultural groups, specifically Black, Italian, Irish, Hispanic, and immigrant communities. This toxicity is further compounded by frequent misogynistic behavior and a fundamental lack of respect for employee dignity.

The persistence of this behavior is directly tied to the current management team, who have demonstrated a continuous failure to enforce company policies, address ongoing misconduct, or implement corrective actions. By refusing to intervene, leadership has effectively condoned a toxic workplace culture, damaging employee morale and exposing the organization to significant liability. Because the current management has shown they will not foster a safe, inclusive, and respectful environment, I request that higher leadership step in immediately. To resolve these systemic issues and ensure the safety and well-being of the staff, I strongly urge a formal review of the current management team, up to and including demotion or termination, alongside the immediate implementation of strict accountability measures.

NY CSSC Brooklyn. All the offices in NY.

Most managers and up at Verizon would not make the cut in today’s landscape. A lot of them were simply at the right place at the right time. They would buckle under today’s pressure, scrutiny, and expectations. Many got there because they knew someone, checked a DEI box, metrics were easier, opportunities were abundant, and the market practically carried people upward.

Today you have to fight for every sale, every customer, every opportunity, while dealing with shrinking compensation, unrealistic expectations from people who had it easier, and bootlickers with Stockholm syndrome who are just happy to finally be a baby shark in the corporate tank. Different era entirely. A lot of the people preaching “adaptability” never actually had to survive in the environment they created.

They should claw back all payments/bonuses made to past management. The reason the company is in this shape is because of this poor judgment which in the contracts they signed stated do what's best for the company which they didnt do. Now instead of taking responsibility they are playing games with this shell and that shell and trying to push the buck and keep sc--wing the had working employees just following what leadership said to do...... how many more games can be played??? These are peoples lives

The post below the line of === recently appeared on a Telstra executive's LinkedIn account. It was also covered by the Australian Financial Review in an article by Media, marketing and telecommunications reporter Sam Buckingham Jones.

As a former Telstra Principal Technical Officer with 4 decades of experience in the network maintenance and implementation field, I find this 'restart' approach extremely disturbing. It fixes nothing and may have the potential to interrupt traffic to triple-zero 'emergency' calls. (That is - calls to police, fire & ambulance).

Such interruptions have previously been linked to the death of people.

How many times will Telstra merely restart equipment before actually fixing the real fault ?

If equipment requires repeated restart to clear faults, then the network owner should really be placing more scrutiny on their vendors and demanding a real fix.

Network operators should focus on quality of service, rather than just 'clearing' equipment alarms to improve KPIs. Network alarms are raised for a reason. - To notify of problems.

Fix the faults. - Don't just clear alarms to improve your statistics.

“Have you tried turning it off and on again?”
Turns out, our network already has🤖🔁🔧

Telstra's SmartFix 🤖 is one of those AI capabilities that’s quietly been working in the background for years to make things better for our customers.

SmartFix uses smart telemetry from across the network 📡 to spot common issues early and, where it can, fix them automatically - sometimes by restarting equipment before a customer even realises there’s a problem.
✅ Fewer faults
⚡ Faster fixes
🙂 Less friction

This is AI doing real work, not demos or hype. And it’s a great example of our Network as a Product strategy in action - using data, software and automation to make the network itself smarter, more adaptive and more valuable 🔧📈.

We’ve been applying AI like this for a long time, embedded deep in how the network operates, with a simple goal:
👉 more reliable connectivity
👉 better experiences
👉 every day

Mike, board, SVP etc do a search on Google for example.....fiserv su-ks.
Take a look at how bad the opinions are of you, your performance and company. Look at all the complaints, absurd fees, lies, etc.. You are Terrible!
This should be VERY Sobering and you should All be Ashamed!

Just keep Sr managers directly reporting to Sr Directors. We are top heavy with people being managers only with one person reporting to them. it’s a joke

Lots of posts deleted. Surely now everyone (employees, management, board, supply chain and peers) can see why bp has been a train wreck since Browne left. It’s culturally corrupt and that prevails everywhere. You can remove the cancer - it’s too late

How secure are you in your job ?
My day to day has been completely replaced with codegen.
Everything from coding, reviewing and analysis.
I havent used my brain in months, everything is done by AI.
Its a blessing and a curse.

As soon as they can resolve the issue with accountability, you will be made redundant and unemployable.

What is your exit strategy ?

The people who get the most done always seem to end up with even more work. It's gone from recognition to punishment at this point.

How can you mess up a company so badly and never answer for any of it? Are we in a TV show and they have plot armor? What is it that's keeping them untouchable despite so many failures?

Besides broken systems, unqualified leadership and performative culture?

More rounds of RIFs are coming at FIS, because that’s leadership’s answer to everything. Don’t fix anything at the top, just keep eliminating positions while our stock tanks and employees live in constant fear of losing their jobs. When are the CEO, CFO and other senior leaders going to be held accountable for the absolutely abysmal state of the business?

is there anything they're actually capable of?

“Following the rollout of AI, supervisors appear to have increased pressure on work output and results. They now seem to expect near-perfect performance from a hybrid coax plant that is fundamentally imperfect.”

I've witnessed several managers openly talk about protecting themselves whenever deadlines slip or projects run into trouble. Meetings usually turn into long discussions about who caused the issue rather than how to solve it. Very few people seem willing to admit mistakes or take responsibility. It's exhausting to work in such an environment.

I absolutely loved todays call and how Xeroids have to be coached on basic concepts as if they are something"New" to drive toward goals and functionality that Lexmark had already been performing and achieved over a decade ago.

SMH - I seriously don't know how a 120 year old company allowed it's workforce to be taken over by employees that just set on their hands collecting pay checks instead of driving these basic practices.