#compliance

Heard Privacy moving to Compliance. Anyone else hear anything?

It’s updated and now shows me as non compliant. They clearly changed the expectations. I’m surprised there isn’t any communication on this from the company.

Nothing says ‘competitive advantage’ like posting the Permian well logs, 1533’ core spacing, and perforation clusters. This is what winning looks like.

Thank you ST for posting that to LinkedIn

Flowers in the townhall: “We are not going to stop focusing on risk. On the contrary. We will continue to focus on risk management.”

Also Flowers: “Pick up co-pilot. Use it. Experiment. Get familiar with it. It is our future”

lol. How many people are using co-pilot to knowingly or unknowingly sp-t out nonsense right now. These banks are highly regulated. Zero controls in place for how outputs are being used. Most managers are reviewing nothing. No one has a clue hoo o w often people are using AI or where.

I’ve seen people submit so much gibberish to me over the past month. Clearly AI outputs.

Good job guys. Not only is RCSA a joke in terms of quality but now we are layering in more risk to every process without understanding the impact.

What could go wrong?

By being secretive and not spooking the shareholders on the depth of the layoffs -- 18%--is Oracle management being too cute by half?

By not filing WARN (over 50 employees at one location) or information under OWBPA (Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, which applies when employees over 40 years old are laid off) they are laying themselves wide open for a barrage of lawsuits.

  Why is it everyday we are instructed to lie about what we do? Manager and GM both tell me to Customer Exception cars in my work order reporting today and blame the customer for cars not getting spotted because we didn't have crews to pull the unit train that was blocking the industry. I question it and get told do it so they don't take "hits" on ISP numbers and that Failure to Comply is an option. So I have to lie and potentially get fired or not lie and potentially get fired. 

Look's like Gainwell has new problems. DOJ said they can be liable for a $500 million medicaid fraud that it ignored. And Treasury has set up a new medicaid fraud task force that we can report to.

And Bloomberg is still investigating I think.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/medicaid-contractor-gainwell-can-be-held-liable-for-fraud-doj-says

Here is the task force info for Treasury.

The Treasury is interested in Medicaid/ Medicare fraud and they are willing to pay for your cooperation. Good luck! Do you think this is what RI has in mind? Cha Ching if you can provide proof!
https://nationaltoday.com/us/mn/bloomington-mn/news/2026/03/29/treasury-launches-whistleblower-rewards-to-crush-health-care-fraud-schemes/

Noticed they’ve separated onshore and offshore Datadog access.

Is this a response to concerns around PHI and PII exposure offshore? Or is there another operational or compliance reason driving the change?

If anyone in leadership has context on what prompted this decision, it would be great to understand the thinking behind it. Increased data controls are always worth discussing, especially would shape on/offshore future hiring pattern.

Anyone following the scandal with the company called Delve? Apparently they were smart guys who used AI and India to provide compliance for companies. You’ll never guess but the Indians just made stuff up and issued fake SOC reports, allegedly. So smart that we are moving work to India.

Veradigm filed a Form 12b-25 saying it could not file its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2025 by the deadline without unreasonable effort or expense. The company said prior financial statements for 2021 and certain interim periods in 2021 and 2022 should no longer be relied upon due to revenue misstatements tied to internal control failures. It also said its 2020 financial statements should no longer be relied upon because of misstatements identified during audit procedures. Veradigm said it has not filed multiple periodic reports for 2023 through 2025, including the 2024 Form 10-K and quarterly reports for 2025. The company said Nasdaq delisted its common stock after determining it remained noncompliant with filing and annual meeting requirements.

I know we have an exit survey but is there something called compliance questions?

Been at the company for 9 years and after the past few months, it opened my eyes and realized I need to get out. Over the past 3 years, my team has underwent so many reductions, this month 7 are leaving to a new department and I somehow managed to dodge all of it. Essentially the team will be cut in half next month and I’d be doing the work of two people- two different roles.

Last week I put in my resignation, I found another job with a different company. I’m nervous and excited. I’ve been so paranoid about losing my job that I’m on edge that it’ll happen with this new company. This is not healthy. Hopefully I’ll be able to get over it.

The only thing I've figured is that non-customer-facing roles will get hit hardest, especially compliance and data analysis. Anyone know more?

Curious if others have seen low RTO compliance percentages explicitly referenced in their performance reviews and whether it impacted ratings. It feels like RTO adherence should be managed separately and not evaluated alongside tangible performance output.

RSCA was a paperwork fiasco. weeks of meetings where managers were bullied into nonsensical compliance tasks that don't manage an iota of risk.

Reward: Promotion to CAO!

Well, so much for 2026 efficiency gains. Maybe AI will hallucinate the answers.

A I-9 audit is in progress. Gainwell is doing their due diligence to ensure all onshore employees are legally employable. Could be setting themselves up for a future sale.

Mandatory now in your training!! . But they can not tell who you are, but know if you have completed it and the data it returns..

I worked for Anthem, Inc. (now Elevance Health) for about 10 years. In 2020 during the pandemic, I accepted another remote job with about a 30% pay increase and put in my two weeks.

While transitioning my work, I attempted to upload some personal files (tax docs and school work) from my company laptop to Dropbox after being told I could remove personal data from the device before leaving. The system flagged it as a potential PHI upload, even though no PHI was transferred.

I met with IT Security, explained everything, and signed a disclosure stating no PHI was uploaded and that it would be treated as a first-offense warning.

The next day I was unexpectedly called into HR and terminated on the spot and told I’d be placed on a “do not rehire” list. It felt like a complete bait-and-switch after being told it would only be a warning.

I started my new job shortly after and have now been there almost 6 years, gaining more experience and completing security and PHI compliance certifications.

Now that I’m applying again (including to companies like Cigna, Optum, and Molina Healthcare), I’m wondering:
• Are “do not rehire” lists internal, or can other companies somehow see them?
• Do background checks reveal that type of HR status?
• After ~7 years, would it be worth contacting Elevance Health to ask if my rehire eligibility could be reconsidered?

Would especially appreciate insight from anyone in HR or healthcare compliance who has seen how this works behind the scenes.

HouseCalls leadership is setting the program up to fail. At a time when MA risk-adjustment coding is under the highest scrutiny it’s ever been and risk scores are still one of the main revenue drivers, they keep adding more internal metrics and efficiency targets that make accurate documentation harder, not easier. There’s a clear inverse relationship between coding to the level of specificity now required and pushing APC, completion %, and daily volume. You simply can’t maximize quality, compliance, and productivity all at the same time. Something will give. Right now it feels like leadership wants all three, which isn’t realistic in the current regulatory environment. This is exactly how programs end up with compliance problems.

For those of you who have been mandated to return to the office 4 days a week are you complying? Has anyone heard of what consequences we face if we don't comply?

The OCC encourages people that work at a covered bank to file a complaint when they believe that bank is not adhering to a consent order. Over the past year there have been Compliance, KYC, and Risk credit approvers let go. Those were the exact areas the CO said Citi had to strengthen. Just not sure filing complaint will make any difference. Or maybe worthwhile just to give Citi a headache???

Mass exodus happening across the retail space. Employees giving the middle finger to Sr Directors and directors for treating them like sh-t, threatening their jobs, overworking front line, creating their own policies. Allowing fraud and major compliance violations to occur in the name of hitting targets and leading in performance. Look very close at the areas that specifically won presidents cabinet and winners circle. Tod Rye is an absolute clown and should be fired immediately. 🤡 🐱

Fiserv’s latest “innovation” is making everyone track their daily location for tax allocation. Because obviously what we all needed was another pointless workflow. Nothing like turning basic payroll into a DIY compliance project. If this is efficiency, I’d hate to see complexity.

I know Chevron monitors activity. Obviously. But has anyone else received a new pop up to confirm that we understand and agree with our appropriate use policies? I’ve asked around and my peers haven’t received….

By forcing the cost of severance down from "top of house" to the division/unit level Scharf is deliberately incentivizing managers to give unwarranted poor reviews to good people so that they can be fired "for cause" with no severance, no cost to the bank. While callous, cold and calculating, it's perfectly legal.

Scharf knows that Secretary of Treasury Bessent and President Trump are pushing hard to deregulate banking which directly impacts staffing at all banks. By eliminating the CFPB and loosening regulatory oversight, employees whose duties include this funciton are no longer needed because the people they answer to in the government agencies are gone.

WF is removing coordination roles in a way that purposefully avoids the visibility that normally accompanies large layoffs. WF distributes reductions in smaller groups across several sites — for example, eliminating roles in increments of 40 or 45 across different regions over several months. None of these individual events reaches the WARN Act threshold that would require public disclosure. Challenger, Gray & Christmas refers to this as the pattern of "forever layoffs" — ongoing workforce optimization rather than discrete restructuring.

The weakening of worker protection enforcement — reduced CFPB oversight of employment-related financial products, reduced NLRB enforcement capacity, weakened EEOC investigation resources — makes this quiet, distributed layoff approach less legally risky for banks. The institutional deterrent against conducting large-scale reductions in ways that might constitute systematic discrimination or age-based targeting has weakened alongside the broader regulatory rollback.

I'm in a location with RTO mandated Tues-Thu. I'm complying when I can, but I need to maximize my productive work time to control the impact this place has on my life. That means sometimes I work from home and I appear on the list for non-compliance with RTO. Could they use that to deny my severance if I'm laid off? I don't trust this organization.

Ohio's new mini-WARN Act became effective on September 29, 2025. This state law supplements existing federal WARN requirements for employers. It expands notice recipients to include both municipal and county officials. The act also mandates more detailed content in layoff notices. Employers face significant penalties for failing to comply with these new obligations.

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/ohio-mini-warn-act-expands-requirements-5087166/

Heather Cianfrocco is out. Seems she has decided to leave. Right. Looks like she was made CEO and than all those investigations, than lateral transfer to compliance. The death department and now quietly will ride into the sunset. Wonder how much she is getting paid to zip it.

AI WILL REPLACE FCC SWITCH REPORTABLES. Regulated AI.

I was laid off from Fossil last year and have long unsubscribed from all communications. Why am I still getting text messages today from the company letting me know what their new number is and that I'm subscribed now to their SMS marketing texts. You know this is illegal right? Let's hope you didn't send that message to every single former subscriber because fines are $500 to $1,500 per message.

I would encourage all Edward Jones employees to familiarize themselves with this term.

Did anyone else receive an email to recertify their I-9?

In my entire time at the company I’ve never been asked this and yes I am a US Citizen.

I had to go to the Charlotte office last week, and met with the Public Cloud Team. I am talking 100% are Indians, and I am sure most are on H1-B visas. Nepotism hiring is clearly going on here, and we are going to be in trouble if rumors about what the current administration is going to implement later this year with Companies and their H1-B visa allotment.

Not to mention legally we are at risk if a non-Indian on the IT side files a legal complaint against us. I am not joking when I say 100%, how was this even allowed to happen. Certainly our HR department has to know this is going on, right????

It's so lame both leaders are not even making eye contact. RA doesn't want to talk about his demotion. Hopefully, they are finding a replacement to consolidate all compliance departments.

Any layoffs for AML in Tampa?

Fortune reported Binance fired compliance staff over Iran sanctions violations. The report claimed $1 billion in USDT linked to Iran flowed through Binance. Binance co-CEO Richard Teng publicly denied these allegations. The company stated its internal review found no sanctions violations. Binance neither confirmed nor denied general layoffs but clarified they are unrelated to sanctions.

https://incrypted.com/en/binance-has-denied-rumors-of-staff-layoffs-and-sanctions-violations-involving-iran/

Will this be enforced ? I mean why bother complying ?

By not complying you will prob get at least a year before being laid off

Anyone know how T-Mobile plans to maintain USGCI compliance given the ongoing shift to FTE's in IT India?

Anyone accessing the Federal Agency data must be a US citizen and must only access the data from the continental USA.

When might the Feds notice this risk?

You ever wonder who was the person that snitched on Chirico to the SEC? The house of cards most likely would have fallen at some point no doubt; but would love to know who hastened that event.

What is the phone number for PNC ETHICS HOTLINE? I need it urgently. Thank you.

Take a look at this announcement from Georgia Health. What will it take for somebody to come down hard on this fraudulent operation?

https://dch.georgia.gov/announcement/2026-02-05/important-update-about-medicaid-and-pck-2