#reorganization

Apparently the chat comments are disabiled arr we in Big Brother Utopia or what? I joined late did anyone reference restructuring or or reorganization?

Ozark Materials is closing its Greenville plant, resulting in 52 layoffs. This closure is part of a broader strategy to reorganize traffic solutions operations. The company aims to optimize its costs through this restructuring. The exact date of the closure was not specified in the provided text. This move impacts local employment in the Greenville area.

https://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/news/2026/09/22/pavement-marking-paint-plant-plans-layoffs.html

We're averaging an HRBP leaving almost every 2 months since the reorg in wave 2. Are we going to do away with this pool model? It's confusing and not working.

Didn’t expect that reorg affected that high level.

Layoffs. Reorgs. Another restructuring. Another leadership change. Another mass layoffs. Just cycle of constant anxiety...

NBCUniversal and Sky are being prepared for separation from Comcast. After years of telling everyone that owning the pipes and the content was the great strategic advantage, those pieces are heading toward separate companies. Splitting just like the Titanic when it sunk.

And that makes me curious about the people who are still here.

Why are you staying?

Is it because you honestly still believe Comcast has a great future?

Is it because you like your team and your manager, even if you don't like what's happening above you?

Are the pay and benefits simply too good to walk away from? [Highly doubt it]

Have you been here 10, 15 or 20 years and leaving feels like losing a piece of yourself or your identity?

Are you close enough to retirement that you're just trying to make it across the finish line?

Are you sitting on RSU, a bonus, pension benefits or some other financial reason that makes leaving now a bad decision? Like a golden handcuff?

Are you quietly waiting for a severance package?

Do you actually believe the split and the new leadership will turn things around? (If so, sell me on it. I'd love to be wrong.)

Or is it because you've been looking and honestly can't find anything else in this market?

Or is it just inertia, and leaving feels scarier than staying?

Just wondering as a former Comcast employee. Aren’t these NPS and YourVoice surveys just a facade designed to make you think your voice matters when, in reality, they don’t really care? I’m genuinely curious why people are choosing a life of constant anxiety and fear, being treated like children because of the RTO mandate and badge policy, while always having that constant feeling that you could be thrown away like a used pair of shoes? Why stay at a company that seems to be heading the way of Blockbuster, RadioShack, and Kodak... into the dustbin of history?

So what keeps YOU at Comcast?

I'm genuinely interested in hearing from the people who have made the conscious decision to stay.

Why haven't you left?

EA has officially been acquired for $55 billion and is going private after 36 years as a publicly traded company.

The buyers are Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners, the investment firm run by Jared Kushner.

The deal has now cleared regulatory approval and closed.

For anyone wondering what this means for employees, there has been no announcement of layoffs tied specifically to the acquisition.

That said, EA has already gone through multiple rounds of cuts. The company eliminated about 5% of its workforce in 2024 and cut several hundred more jobs earlier this year. EA had around 14,500 employees as of March 2025.

Going private also means EA will no longer have to report quarterly results publicly.

So, nothing new has been announced on layoffs yet, but this is obviously something worth watching closely now that the acquisition is complete.

If anyone is hearing about reorganizations, team changes, hiring freezes, or cuts following the deal, please post what you're seeing.

I understand there have already been many posts about the VSP and involuntary separations (layoffs). Some posts provide information people need at the moment, while others are more focused on sharing opinions or experiences. Either way, there was a post some time ago about SIU suggesting that the changes there might only be the beginning, and that the broader Compliance & Ethics organization may need to be reevaluated, reorganized, and reassessed to ensure its policies, procedures, and processes are current and effective.

I don't want to beat a dead horse, but recent departures within Compliance & Ethics caught my attention.

I understand that the Vice President overseeing the Conflict of Interest (COI) team and Compliance Investigations Unit (CIU) is no longer with the company. I also understand that certain management personnel within Special Investigations Unit (SIU) are no longer there, and that the former Chief Risk & Compliance Officer, is no longer with Centene.

Any one departure can happen for many different reasons, and I don't think it would be appropriate to speculate about why individuals have left. However, when there are multiple departures across different levels of a Compliance organization, I think it is reasonable to ask whether the organization itself should be taking a closer look at its structure, processes, and leadership.

Perhaps this is an opportunity for Centene to take a step back and conduct a comprehensive review of Compliance & Ethics before simply continuing with business as usual.

Some questions worth asking:
• Are the policies and procedures current, comprehensive, and consistently applied?
• Are there clear guidelines and quick-reference resources for investigators and management?
• Are investigations being conducted and closed using consistent and documented standards?
• Are employees given clear and consistent expectations for handling cases?
• Are investigators receiving the appropriate training and qualifications for the responsibilities they are performing?
• Are compliance standards being applied consistently within Compliance & Ethics itself?
• Are management decisions consistently supported by established policies and procedures?

If Compliance & Ethics is responsible for ensuring that other departments follow policies, regulations, and established standards, shouldn't the same level of scrutiny be applied internally?

This isn't about pointing fingers at individual employees. It's about asking whether the organization has the right structure, leadership, policies, procedures, training, and oversight in place to effectively perform one of the most important functions within the company.

When there are departures at different levels of Compliance & Ethics, perhaps the appropriate response isn't simply to fill the vacancies and move forward. Perhaps it's time to stop, look at the bigger picture, and ask whether there is something within the organization that needs to be addressed.

Before Compliance can effectively hold the rest of the organization accountable, Compliance should be willing to hold itself accountable as well.

Was it a good call? I was surprised. Not sure what this means for re-orgs.

At what point does leadership admit the entertainment strategy isn’t working?

CP keeps getting squeezed while resources continue going toward chasing another Barbie movie moment. Barbie was lightning in a bottle. Instead of strengthening the businesses that actually generate consistent revenue, leadership seems determined to recreate something that may not be repeatable.

Then come the layoffs, reorganization and promotions at the top, while everyone else is expected to do more with less.

“Toy to Joy” sounds great in a presentation. Employees are still waiting to see the Joy part.

So there's a solid rumor going around that internal cs and tech will be rebadged to a PSO Vendor. VPs will not confirm or deny this claim, and from a company standpoint this just happened with the stores going to indirect. Seems to me like this can happen as Sprint and AT&T both have done this in the past. This would be wild if it happened.

So there's a solid rumor going around that internal cs and tech will be rebadged to a PSO Vendor. VPs will not confirm or deny this claim, and from a company standpoint this just happened with the stores going to indirect. Seems to me like this can happen as Sprint and AT&T both have done this in the past. This would be wild if it happened.

The vibe of the townhall seemed like a 3 hr 1970s indie movie were absolutely nothing happens!
The usual cry over the ongoing demise of Chemicals business (probably the 10th quarter and still pending).

Funny that an organization that keeps talking about Decision Quality (they spend millions in building those very DQ tools) had such poor time management in their townhall that half of the VPs weren't able to present - a prime demonstration of how pathetic Technology org is in planning, management and execution!
Leaders incharge of innovation within Technology, feeling absolutely delighted about working with Universities and external parties, rather than focusing on innovating something within Shell. Unnecessary blabber about Data and AI when infact IDT are the rightful owners of it.
The sheer audacity of the leaders to say that 'there is no reorganization planned for technology', at a time when all other functions have been shaken to their core, is pure delusional if not foolishness.

Any Thoughts? Comments?

Several people leaving the company including VP of S&T & mention that S&T will no longer exist. What will happen to those teams?

The old idea of spending your entire career at CDW doesn't make much sense anymore. This place has proven it will reorganize or eliminate your position regardless of how long you've been here. These days, switching jobs can be the fastest way to increase your salary and take on a better role. How times have changed...

The University of Southern California's Viterbi School of Engineering is implementing a restructuring plan. This reorganization is a direct result of necessary budget reductions. Consequently, sixty-five employees will be laid off. These job cuts are scheduled to occur between November 4 and December 3. The university aims to align its resources with future strategic priorities.

Los Angeles, California

https://www.dailynews.com/2026/09/11/usc-cuts-65-workers-at-viterbi-school-of-engineering/

The Governor's Office of Information Technology has rehired 15 of the 173 employees laid off in May. This comes after a significant reorganization aimed at improving customer satisfaction and addressing cybersecurity concerns. While some former employees struggle to find new work, the agency reports progress in efficiency and cost savings. New hires for 98 positions are being processed, with most offers extended. The agency emphasizes ongoing efforts to support remaining staff through the transition.

Denver, Colorado

https://coloradosun.com/2026/09/10/colorado-information-technology-oit-jobs-layoffs-reorganization/

Does anybody still consider a viable option to commute to Edmonton and be back to Calgary for the weekends? I feel it’s too risky to go for a full move in 2028 and then face another reorganization and layoffs before moving to the new building in 2029…

I was recently re-allocated to a new (for me) department. I've been with the bank for 20 years and have been shuffled around before but it was usually due to old team being absorbed for another project. This time feels different. My boss and his boss pulled up to inform me that I was being moved to another department as they have an urgent need in GFC for investigations/research. I’m curious if anyone knows how/why it’s determined who gets moved off the team/department they’ve been in for 10+ years to a new department. My old team is still active and together, but I’m the one moved. For reference, Meets/Meets, B5, salaried.

Meta is recalling some employees to management positions within its Applied AI division. This move represents a partial reversal of the company's recent strategy to reduce middle management. The program is voluntary for affected employees. This initiative comes after Meta previously downsized its workforce and management ranks. The company has not commented on this development.

Menlo Park, California

https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-asks-some-ai-employees-to-become-managers-again-2026-9

No more regional - ITS EAST OR WEST. Byebye SFAs. Merging of teams incoming. Fight for your spot. You are now Amazon employees, 100%. Amazon everything. TheWorkNumber will say you've worked at Amazon since July. Good luck trying to say you worked at Whole Foods. That's all gone. There is no worker history. You're done. STLs in charge of multiple "daily shop" stores.

IG Group is undertaking a major restructuring by merging its regional consumer divisions into a single global unit. This consolidation is expected to result in hundreds of job losses across various international locations. Redundancy consultations have already commenced in the UK, with similar discussions anticipated in numerous other countries throughout September. The company states this move is part of a strategic review aimed at enhancing customer service and operational efficiency. The exact number of affected employees and the financial impact of these changes have not yet been disclosed.

London, United Kingdom

https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/brokers/report-ig-prepares-hundreds-of-layoffs-in-consumer-business-restructure/

Can anyone explain the recent and upcoming changes in IBMC?

How is this going to impact b6 to b8?
I've read the announcement but still have no clue what's changing beyond my manager.

USA Today is undergoing a companywide reorganization due to declining search engine traffic. This restructuring has led to editorial employee layoffs. The company cited evolving consumer discovery methods and the impact of AI summaries on search results. These changes are forcing news organizations to adapt their strategies for reaching audiences. The exact number of affected employees was not disclosed.

Stockton, California

https://stocktonia.org/news/business/2026/09/04/usa-today-owner-of-stockton-record-cuts-staff-and-reorganizes-editorial-operations/

It goes without saying but just a friendly reminder during the reorg. Big brothers are watching us.

Usually pre reorg they use consultants to assess the structure and talent. Who is LHH? Why is goal setting such an urgency when majority of folks get ignored and sc--wed

MW is 0-2 on deep cut reorgs that have royally messed up the company. Is he going to go 0-3 and mess it up further with more reorgs run by consultants we pay millions to? Managers out there, what is being said about the state of the company and the poor morale?

Hearing whispers about possible layoffs, reorganizations, hiring freezes, or team cuts?

Post what you’ve heard below. Please label everything as unverified rumor/speculation, avoid naming or identifying individual employees, and don’t share confidential or proprietary information.

Useful details:

What was the rumor?
Which department/area was it about?
When did you hear it?
Was it firsthand or secondhand?
How confident are you?
Let’s keep this thread focused on separating rumor from confirmed information. If something gets officially confirmed, update your comment so others know.

Centene apparently found another place to put all those savings from “operational efficiency”: Ambetter Health is now sponsoring Mizzou athletics. All sports, because apparently one team wasn’t enough.

It’s football season, though, so for now we get to watch the Ambetter logo ride around on jerseys every Saturday. The pairing is almost too good. Mizzou has spent years getting mileage out of 2-star and 3-star recruits, and Ambetter has spent years collecting 2-star and 3-star reviews. That’s the kind of synergy somebody in leadership probably put on a slide and called strategic alignment, brand activation, stakeholder engagement, or some other expensive phrase for “we bought a sponsorship.”

Meanwhile, employees are watching VSP dates, layoffs, reorganizations, and wondering who gets whacked next. Apparently the marketing budget remains resilient and well-positioned for long-term growth.

I’ve already said reporters ought to be reporting on what is actually happening at Centene, but nobody seems terribly interested in connecting the layoffs, VSPs, vendors, spending, stock performance, and forecasts that keep heading the wrong direction. So I guess somebody has to.

At least the C-suite should get some nice box seats. They can sit up there late in the season and watch Mizzou get rolled by the big boys, just like the stock and the forecast.

I’m sure there’s a slide somewhere showing positive momentum.

https://www.si.com/college/missouri/football/mizzou-athletics-announces-jersey-patch-sponsorship-with-ambetter-health

NIke really needs to address its hiring and assess talent and performance culture. Business is in the sh*tier and leaders can no longer get by with keeping their friends and inner circle safe. Right now, way too many people are getting by purely on favoritism and nepotism while others carry the actual workload.

Also, trying to reach a younger demographic shouldn't mean handing senior titles to former athletes who lack business experience and corporate work ethic. We need a realistic balance of proven experience and institutional knowledge if we want the company to succeed.

All I keep hearing from multiple departments is that January is a major reorganization is going to happen company wide, heard from VZW and VZB departments alike, whether a layoff happens this year, appears it might, so the shuffle and changes will happen. Not all changes are bad, more efficient work habits and dead weight, and yes the union has caused a lackadaisical attitude among many not pulling their own weight, a lot a house cleaning needs and should take place if you like it or not, change will happen. This wasn’t my first job and probably won’t be my last.

Does any one have an idea when the reorganization will come to the refineries? I've heard rumors of October but if they announce the new chart then I don't know if layoffs will happen then or after the first of the year.

In December, CW was exited and the role was eliminated by Hill stating it was to remove layers.

Today, role is reinstated and offered to JE from Walmart and is now considered a vital role and critical to the strategy.

Optically speaking, this is horrible. Leadership never beating the allegations that they are just throwing sh-t at the wall and seeing what sticks.

EH proving he isn’t the guy and must now make moves to set up his backfill.

What are PepsiCo’s plans for the current TSR position if the beverage and snack businesses eventually combine their frontline sales teams?

Management keep shuffling people around, employees and contractors were let go but it looks like once the Y28 administration comes in, the cycle will start again everyone brought back, teams bloated, and the same loop repeating.

Incoming. This will be Act II of the Division dissolution. Now the legacy GTO leaders get their just due. A new product led organization is upon us. Welcome Fraser to that post and adios to the most arrogant set of IT leaders I have ever had to tolerate. You of 15-20 years of incompetence built this mess and now you try to claim the NewCo idea as yours. Make no mistake, it was and is not. Remainco begins on September 8th. Watch the fireworks begin next week. Here we go!

So help me understand, they got rid of bpSolutions and instead have instead made a big central organisation under Upstream HSE & Ops. One VP pre reorg to 6VPs post re-org. Surely the cottage industry has just shifted to satisfy some power hungry and egoistical characters. What is the point and what a disaster!

Does anyone actually know what is going on? The total lack of communication or transparency makes it seem ominous.

FIS is going through another realignment, and based on the company’s recent financial guidance and continued focus on reducing costs, It is estimate there’s about a 65–75% chance that another round of layoffs will follow.That doesn’t necessarily mean a massive company-wide layoff. It’s more likely to be targeted at areas affected by reorganizations, product consolidation, automation, and cost reductions. For employees, the biggest question is whether your role or product is being consolidated, automated, moved, or eliminated. If your expertise is critical to keeping an important product or process operating, that can actually make your position more valuable during a restructuring.

Anyone hearning anything about reporting requirement ratio's? I am hearing a mandatory 6-1 to eliminate middle management.