#employeerelations

Directors that say yes to every request from VPs no matter how ridiculous or last minute the ask continue to survive. They have their head so far up the VPs a$$ hoping to advance their own career with no regard to their team. Truly a good ole boys club at that level. At the end of the day every employee is just a number with a salary that will be the deciding factor in the next round of layoffs. No amount of extra effort will be taken in to consideration, so take your PTO and enjoy time with friends and family.

You could be sick on your death bed and Humana will still want you to call in and report your absence

Legit said the pay was under market, that the raises I am stating are "best case" are far below market for role, and that nominal cash bonuses with zero equity upside mean: "we aren't paying to keep you or grow you."

This was the UHG CoPilot, not some outside source. Our leaders told us to use AI for professional development and job work, and wow! LOL

Is the lack of managerial support a new Humana tactic to quiet fire employees? Have you noticed a lack of leadership? I have and I’m pretty sure Humana is using this new tactic to motivate you to leave.

A list is being drawn up of expats that have left owing to the security situation. Expect reprisals.

where is the “button”? is there a “goto”? Is there an app?

does one send an email to the supervisor first before using the official avenue to HR?

Hi all,

I recently received an offer from PayPal. However, I’ve been seeing a lot of concerns on Blind about potential layoffs, especially with the recent CEO change and stock price drops.

Does anyone know how PayPal typically handles layoffs with very recent hires? Are new hires usually affected in restructuring rounds?

Also, if layoffs were to happen, how soon will be?

Any insights from current or former employees would be really helpful. Thanks!

Hello IBMers - For folks here who received received their employment verification letter for themselves or third party after RA action. What does the employment verification letter date state in terms of last day . For current employees it shows service reference date as start date (same date of hire). When you are separated what does IBM show ..Does the service reference date indicate last date of employment or last day worked or last day before you went on leave (if you were on LOA) ?

There’s a lot of negative sentiment here around Thrive Together. That reaction is completely rational. Many people are trying to rationalize the decision - commercial real estate exposure, leadership being out of touch, or executives undervaluing remote productivity. Those explanations miss the point. Thrive Together is a much larger slight against employees than most people realize.

It’s easy to assume the executive team is uninformed or making poorly thought-out decisions. That assumption is wrong. These are experienced business leaders who understand exactly what they are doing. Whether internal metrics show remote work to be more productive is irrelevant. If those metrics supported the narrative being pushed, employees would see them. They don’t, and they won’t. Leadership knows the data doesn’t support the story, and they don’t need it to.

Their only real objective is increasing the stock price.

Historically, one way companies accomplish that is by reducing headcount. The problem is layoffs come with costs - severance packages and payouts of accrued PTO. Thrive Together creates a mechanism to reduce the workforce without formally conducting layoffs and without paying those costs.

Instead of layoffs, the company now has a framework where employees who cannot comply with Thrive Together requirements can simply be labeled as low performers. That label leads to performance improvement plans and eventual termination. The end result is the same as a layoff, but without severance, without PTO payouts, and without triggering the procedures that normally accompany workforce reductions.

Flexible Time Off (FTO) reinforces this system.

FTO didn’t expand a benefit - it removed one. Under a traditional PTO system, employees accrued time off that the company was obligated to honor or pay out. Under FTO, nothing accrues. Time off is technically “unlimited,” but in practice none of it is guaranteed.

FTO can function in a truly flexible remote or hybrid environment where employees aren’t bound by strict office attendance quotas. That is not the environment being created here.

Under the current policy, time taken under FTO does not reduce in-office attendance expectations. For the average employee, that creates a clear disincentive to take vacation because office quotas remain unchanged regardless of time off.

Leadership recently increased the expectation to three days per week in the office. If an employee takes a week of vacation, they still owe those three in-office days somewhere else in the fiscal year. Two weeks of vacation doubles that deficit.

If the company eventually moves to four or five in-office days per week - as many suspect it will - the system becomes mathematically unsustainable. There will be no practical way for employees to take time off while still meeting attendance expectations within a quarter. FTO with Thrive Together is structurally incompatible with meaningful time off.

What’s happening here isn’t confusion or poor planning. It’s a gradual tightening of pressure on the workforce while removing the company’s obligations that typically accompany layoffs. Even better, some employees will leave on their own to avoid the mess.

The plan was always to make you work more while creating a system that results in less time off, lower performance reviews, and a convenient excuse to fire people without severance.

How does one resign from this place?

• where is the “button”? is there a “goto”? Is there an app?
• does one send an email to the supervisor first before using the official avenue to HR?

What is the deal with the hatred towards IT at Chevron? Its pure he-l working here in IT as you are treated as a 3rd class citizen. We are the first for our ignorant ELT to pick on for cuts all while that advertise around Houston how they are technologically advanced and talking about how important IT is. For those who say we dont pump oil, try to do your job now without IT. Like getting paid, well software makes it happen.

https://www.peoplematters.in/news/strategic-hr/saps-new-bonus-system-rewards-managers-who-missed-targets-faces-employee-backlash-48615

Anyone see the “ATT is He-l” written in sharpie. Cracks me up every time I see it. Also those godda-n elevators are so slow

https://youtube.com/shorts/zidJDw00ZYo

YOU!

I haven't been here long. Was that always a thing, or is it new?

By forcing the cost of severance down from "top of house" to the division/unit level Scharf is deliberately incentivizing managers to give unwarranted poor reviews to good people so that they can be fired "for cause" with no severance, no cost to the bank. While callous, cold and calculating, it's perfectly legal.

Scharf knows that Secretary of Treasury Bessent and President Trump are pushing hard to deregulate banking which directly impacts staffing at all banks. By eliminating the CFPB and loosening regulatory oversight, employees whose duties include this funciton are no longer needed because the people they answer to in the government agencies are gone.

WF is removing coordination roles in a way that purposefully avoids the visibility that normally accompanies large layoffs. WF distributes reductions in smaller groups across several sites — for example, eliminating roles in increments of 40 or 45 across different regions over several months. None of these individual events reaches the WARN Act threshold that would require public disclosure. Challenger, Gray & Christmas refers to this as the pattern of "forever layoffs" — ongoing workforce optimization rather than discrete restructuring.

The weakening of worker protection enforcement — reduced CFPB oversight of employment-related financial products, reduced NLRB enforcement capacity, weakened EEOC investigation resources — makes this quiet, distributed layoff approach less legally risky for banks. The institutional deterrent against conducting large-scale reductions in ways that might constitute systematic discrimination or age-based targeting has weakened alongside the broader regulatory rollback.

Are there any departments impacted by layoffs today?

Medicare UM has been hobbling along, with not enough work, since early January. Upper management says that a "strategic decision" was made to pull out of some "overly costly markets", with an expected 22% reduction in membership. It does not take rocket science to understand that if you reduce membership by 22%, you will need 22% less staff, not including cuts for automation.
We all know the RIFs are coming. What are they waiting on? Just put us out of our misery so we can figure out what we are doing with our lives.

I’d love to see some change on the floor

I don’t think everything is our representatives fault we have to take some accountability as well.

One of the things I don’t understand from our reps though is the gate keeping of our contract, I’ve heard a few times about refusal to get a copy of the contract.

We should all have the opportunity to get a copy so we can enforce the contract and hold management and each other accountable.

All WF employees should be scared

This Lisa Bodello lady they are paying to talk about culture, too many meetings, taking the time to think, and all the other hogwash… she must not be in the loop of all the things Edward Jones is taking away from us right now!

She says “take time to think”. When, during our two hour commute? Because being IN the office nine hours a day isn’t going to be where we get to think when we are hearing everyone on zoom around us, being on zoom cause others still aren’t in the office, hearing people talking about their d-mb weekend plans, what they have for lunch, and other stupid bullsh-t.

She says:
Get rid of stuff that doesn’t matter— being in the office doesn’t matter.
Ki-l stupid rules at work —come into the office four days a week - it doesn’t add any value to the EMPLOYEEEE.

This Lisa lady speaking is absolutely fu--ing ironic and absurd - have a town hall basically telling us to fu-k off and our kids don’t matter - and the next day have this Lisa lady trying to tell us what we need to stop doing to be better for ourselves when Edward Jones is taking it all away. THANKS FOR THE GOOD BELLY LAUGHS EDWARD JONES.

Does anyone know when the 2026 RSUs that were awarded will show in our benefits online account?

I just heard somebody say he thinks more notifications will go out today, but I have a feeling he's just being paranoid. It's over, right?

Yall were right! I just got my raise last week and pulled in a meeting to get let go this morning. I am apart of the team that is one of the merger companies. Damn!

Great news to hear from HR that they’re discontinuing the pension plan for those of us who have remained loyal to the company and accelerated the growth of the stock price.

St. Helena Unified School District plans staff reductions. Eight roles are affected, including a high school counseling position. The district cites falling student numbers and increased expenses. Faculty members voiced strong concerns about the proposed cuts. The school board must finalize these decisions by May 15.

https://napavalleyregister.com/star/news/st-helena-high-school-layoffs-guidance-counselor/article_07d70c72-2465-40c3-9e80-cc9a709e731b.html

Delivering the mission statement 'Lets get going' and simultaneously firing about 1000 people would appear to show a serious lack of common sense. Are you people serious?

# Morgan Stanley Layoff Report — March 4, 2026
Source: TheLayoff.com | Thread: Morgan Stanley WM/Tech RIF
Thread ID: @OP+1kjtkpz73
Views: 8,754 | Replies: 60 | Last Activity: 8 hours ago (as of report generation)

## Executive Summary

On March 4, 2026, Morgan Stanley carried out a significant reduction in force (RIF) affecting its Wealth Management (WM) and Technology divisions globally. The Wall Street Journal pegged the cuts at approximately 2,500 employees, representing roughly 3% of the total workforce (@ez). The layoffs rolled out across time zones throughout the day, beginning in Asia and progressing through EMEA and North America. Affected employees reported being escorted out of offices, receiving garden leave notices, and in some cases discovering their severance was capped below what their tenure would suggest. No WARN Act filings were identified by thread participants ahead of the event.

## Scale & Official Confirmation

The thread was initiated by Anonymous 72 (@OP+1kjtkpz73) on March 4, who confirmed the RIF for WM was set to occur that day. The original post was made approximately one day before widespread reporting emerged.

The scale was subsequently corroborated by a user citing Wall Street Journal coverage (@ez):

"Wall Street Journal just posted a story. Said 2,500 or 3% of the workforce."

This figure places the event among Morgan Stanley's more significant recent headcount reductions. The thread notes no advance WARN Act filings were identified in the US (@eg, @dq), which generated discussion — one user speculated this may be because the majority of cuts were concentrated outside the US (@dr), which would exempt the firm from domestic filing requirements.

## Geographic Scope

Layoffs were confirmed or credibly reported across at least six cities spanning four countries, suggesting a coordinated global action rather than a regionally isolated restructuring.

### Asia (First Wave)
The thread noted that March 4 arrived in Asia first, and that the RIF had "started" there (@b6). Specific details from Asian offices were limited in the thread.

### London & EMEA (Second Wave)

• A London equities employee reported being told their position was at risk (@cw).
• Tech in London was independently confirmed as affected (@d0).
• One user reported that London had "finished" processing before the US wave began (@dn), suggesting a structured, time-zone-sequenced rollout.
• An EMEA-wide mandatory call for tech staff was reportedly called on short notice (@cp).

### Glasgow

• Affected divisions confirmed: finance, legal, and cyber security (@dd).
• Notably, one user suggested the cuts in Glasgow may have begun as early as mid-February, with several VPs disappearing around February 15 on apparent "leave" of 1.5–2 months — interpreted by the poster as quiet separations ahead of the formal RIF date (@dd).
• One IB employee in Glasgow confirmed their role was designated "at risk" and that a 30-day consultation period had commenced (@f8).

### Montreal

• Tech division confirmed affected (@ed).
• One employee reported a colleague was escorted out of the office with all her belongings (@ef).
• An Executive Director in Montreal was confirmed let go (@ey).

### New York

• WM Operations confirmed affected; at least one employee confirmed they were laid off (@dj).
• A 28+ year veteran (VP L4, tech) in NYC confirmed separation (details in Severance section below) (@dv).

### Alpharetta, GA

• Confirmed affected (@dk).

### Arlington, VA

• Multiple people escorted out of the Arlington office (@er).

## Seniority of Those Affected

Reports suggest the RIF was not limited to junior employees. Confirmed or reported senior separations include:

The presence of EDs and senior VPs in the affected pool suggests this was a performance-agnostic cost reduction exercise rather than a targeted performance-based action.

## Severance & Compensation Details

One of the most detailed firsthand accounts came from a 28+ year NYC VP (L4) in technology (@dv):

• Placed on garden leave through June 30, 2026
• Severance was described as capped, despite tenure exceeding the cap threshold
• The poster noted "there were good things there and better things ahead"

A follow-up post from another affected employee (@dx) added:

• Received 3 weeks of severance per year of service, but capped at 15 years despite 20 years of actual tenure

This cap drew scrutiny. Anonymous 72 (@e4) noted the cap represents a specific dollar ceiling tied to officer title, and that it may be legally challengeable since the cap threshold is never disclosed to employees prior to a RIF.

A separate user confirmed there is an internal HR website listing the dollar caps by title (VP/ED/MD) (@e7), though the URL was not publicly shared in the thread.

## Process & Transparency Concerns

Several users raised concerns about how the RIF was handled procedurally:

• No WARN Act notices identified for the US as of the time of posting (@eg, @dq). One user noted this may be because the cuts were primarily non-US in focus (@dr), which would exempt the firm from the 60-day advance notice requirement under the federal WARN Act.
• No advance media coverage — multiple users expressed surprise that a reduction of this scale had not appeared in the press beforehand (@b5, @dq).
• One user speculated the March 4 date may not represent the end of reductions, suggesting a rolling layoff model in which additional divisions (e.g., Banking, non-tech WM) could follow in subsequent weeks (@ds).
• The Glasgow situation (@dd) raises the possibility that some separations were being quietly processed weeks before the official RIF date, which would be consistent with a rolling or pre-staged reduction strategy.

## Division Breakdown

Based on thread reports, the following divisions were mentioned as affected:

## Notable Contested Claims

Two posts (@e9, @ej) made claims alleging that layoffs disproportionately targeted white employees and attributed this to managerial bias. These posts received heavily split reactions (roughly equal upvotes and downvotes) and generated significant sub-thread debate. They are noted here for completeness but:

1. Are not independently verifiable from thread content
2. Represent individual perceptions, not documented patterns
3. Should not be treated as factual reporting absent external corroboration

## Key Open Questions (As of Report Date)

• Will additional RIF waves affect Banking and non-tech WM, as speculated in @ds?
• Are severance caps legally defensible given the non-disclosure issue raised in @e4?
• Did Glasgow separations beginning ~February 15 (@dd) constitute a pre-staged RIF, and does this affect WARN Act or UK employment law compliance?
• What is the total headcount impact in each geographic region?

• Report compiled from user posts on TheLayoff.com thread @OP+1kjtkpz73. All information is sourced from anonymous employee accounts.

Some folks I know left stable jobs to come here, thought they were moving up. Less than a year later, laid off. Probably just layoff fodder to even out the demographics. This place ruins lives.

I’ve worked at Wells Fargo for five years. For four consecutive years, I met expectations and received merit bonuses. Last year was the only time I was rated “inconsistent,” based on metrics that were never clearly communicated, and I did not receive a raise.

Now I’m being told I must outperform everyone on the team because of last year’s rating. I’m required to have weekly check-ins and am being criticized over minor issues, while others with similar performance are not held to the same standard.

My manager has said this is due to a “new policy,” but the way it’s being applied feels selective and unfair. At the same time, documentation is being added to Workday that does not accurately reflect the full picture of my performance.

…knock it off! I know it su-ks always being worried about losing your job every Tuesday after payday, but you really don’t want to lose your job, especially with so many industries laying off in the last year or so. It sounds good to have a break from all the cr-p that goes on in office (I totally get that), but being freshly unemployed is NOT fun and I do not wish that upon anyone! It is hard to find a job in 2025/2026, especially when you don’t already have a job. A lot of posts for the last week or so saying March 3rd was going to be a huge day for layoffs and it was no worse than any other day. Stop creating unnecessary drama and fear for people saying the sky is falling when it’s not. Yes, I know some people lost their jobs yesterday and that su-ks, but be a good person and don’t post rumors…only post facts!

I have worked at the bank since 2014. Several years ago I received a promotion to Sr. Lead Analytic Consultant. The raise that went with that promotion put me above the lower limits by just a couple thousand dollars. Currently that role is posting for $139K - $239K per year. After my increase this year I am still making below the lower limit. Is this normal? Are others experiencing this same issue? For background, I have been 'Meets' consistently over the last couple years but never missed an SLA or Training assignment.

Be great at execution! Be great at chopping headcount.

Do whats right: fire everyone!

Embrace candor: You will be fired.

Build a high performing team, bit in India.

On the Beat, seeing some red faces trying to sell these budget restraints.

This will come as a surprise to Chevron management; respect is earned and not deserved due to title or legacy. It has been a long time since I worked with a Chevron manager who actually earned respect. Management drafts way too many entitled individuals into their ranks who have little to no regard for the workforce, do not have a reasonable understanding of the workflows they are responsible for nor a comprehension of the industry as a whole. Sad to see the company that I have worked for over twenty years start to cave in on itself due to poor leadership and decision making. Management ranks are full of nepo-babies, one hit wonders, and TikTok influencers without a clue. Experience, skills, and hard work are no longer valued here.

WellCare will layoff over 100 employees sometime before March 31, 2026. No formal communication has been given to impacted employees. Only stated that you will know sometime this month when your last day is and possible severance if eligible.

I talked to a coworker recently who said the pay increases in the past were retroactively paid out, going back to the beginning of the year. Is that true?

Does anyone know where to find our bonus payslip for this Friday? I’d like to see the actual amount and there’s nothing on Workday - of course.