#legal

CDW let go of roughly 750 employees, with zero prior notice. I know that many are not getting 60 days of pay.

Is this a violation of the WARN Act? Or is there some loophole related to remote work and multiple offices that CDW is able to use as a defense?

Opening a thread to provide insights to those who have been impacted by the latest RIF at CDW. By now, we should have received our severance packages and the clock has begun for the review. Very clearly in the documentation, it states "you have been advised in writing to seek legal counsel concerning the terms of this General Release before signing it and have had ample time to do so...".

Has anyone been able to seek legal counsel? What is the general feedback from counsel on the General Release and any other terms of the separation?

So if one applies for VSP and gets declined. Supposedly they can still lay off that same employee later but now without the additional bonus weeks offered in VSP. Isn't that questionable? A possible law suit? I mean if they deny a significant amount of applicants and then lay them off in August, that would be decent savings for them... somehow this entire situation makes me think of " Attica! Attica!" shouted by Al Pacino in the 1975 film Dog Day Afternoon.....Pacino, playing a desperate bank robber cornered by police, uses the chant to reference the 1971 Attica prison riot. He does this to rally the crowd and turn public sympathy against aggressive police tactics. Can't remember how it worked out for Al. ..

BUCKLE UP -
There is no legal limit on how many times a company can alter a Voluntary Separation Program (VSP) offer before you sign it. An employer can revise, amend, or even cancel the offer entirely anytime prior to your acceptance.However, after you and the company have both signed the agreement, it becomes a binding contract. Neither party can legally change the terms post-signature unless the contract specifically includes a modification clause allowing for it, or both parties mutually agree in writing to an amendment.

https://www.beckerspayer.com/legal/elevance-pays-cms-342m-amid-medicare-

Elevance Health paid CMS $342 million following a Medicare Advantage sanction notice alleging the insurer did not properly address overpayments for years.

June 22 filings in a New York federal court included an email from an Elevance vice president to CMS, confirming the payment was a “remittance of the total overpayment amount” related to the Risk Adjustment Overpayment Reporting module. Elevance conducted the wire transfer May 27, and CMS confirmed receipt the next day.

On May 29, a separate CMS letter informed Elevance that it had received the company’s attestation, but it did not specify the payment amount at the time. That step, along with initial submissions to the appropriate electronic systems, temporarily staved off intermediate sanctions. However, CMS said the insurer has until the end of June and July to complete further tasks — such as resolving issues across other risk-adjustment modules and addressing additional overpayment issues — before sanctions kick in.

The most recent filings also included a June 22 letter from the U.S. attorney’s office to the judge, challenging Elevance’s desire for additional discovery regarding the sanction notice.

“To the extent Anthem [now Elevance] wishes to challenge CMS’ administrative action, this is not the appropriate forum to do so,” the letter said.

CMS told Elevance in February that it would impose sanctions affecting MA prescription dr-g plan enrollment and communications due to a lack of compliance with risk-adjustment data submission requirements, interfering with the return of overpayments.

Elevance CFO Mark Kaye previously said the company had set aside $935 million to address the dispute. As of February, Elevance had about 2 million MA members.

This case is not the only source of tension between Elevance and the federal government right now. A Justice Department lawsuit first filed in 2020 alleges False Claims Act violations.

“Elevance Health continues to engage in constructive dialogue with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,” an Elevance spokesperson told Becker’s June 26. “We remain optimistic that a resolution can be reached and value our longstanding relationship with CMS.”

CMS said, if any sanctions take effect, current MA beneficiaries will continue to access their coverage and benefits as usual, since the sanctions would only apply to new enrollments and communications.

“CMS is committed to ensuring accurate Medicare Advantage (MA) payments, compliance with federal requirements and the protection of taxpayer dollars. Accurate and timely submission of MA risk adjustment data is essential to ensure Medicare pays appropriately for the beneficiaries they serve,” CMS told Becker’s in a June 29 statement.

Just for S&Gs, send boss an email, “I’ve deleted the legal hold folders as you’ve directed before turning in my laptop. I think you’ll be safe.”

https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/ex-att-lawyer-who-raised-compliance-concerns-accused-ethics-violations-2026-06-23/

big issue. they want to move to start firing within a month without a social plan - payment&benefits on top of normal salary. its BIG NO NO here. legally they cannot do this. unions say its a joke and called ceo and the human resourses spineless. all this comes from mr cat in the bag.

https://www.ad-hoc-news.de/boerse/news/ueberblick/u-s-layoff-wave-triggers-legal-scrutiny-as-243-000-warn-notices-hit-in/69607720

https://ionanalytics.com/insights/debtwire/optimum-creditors-have-leverage-to-challenge-troubled-telecoms-controversial-asset-transfers-legal-analysis/

I moved across the country from California to Dallas end of last year as part of the FTW effort to keep my job. I was then locked out of my account before Memorial Day, and last week received notice that I am being surplussed.

I’m wondering if as a part of any of these facts I have any legal ground to stand on against the company. Is anyone else in the same boat or have had a similar experience? This feels like totally unfair and targeted treatment.

Spirit Airlines’ bankruptcy has become a high-profile example of the legal hurdles terminated employees face, even as they argue the mass layoffs were done without the legally required notice.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/spirit-layoff-suit-puts-spotlight-on-labor-rights-in-bankruptcy

Im assuming there are a lot of knowledgeable individuals here who may be able to clarify this.
Can someone explain whether banks are legally required to comply with search warrants issued by a local police department in cases involving fraudulent wire transfers?
I recently had a fraudulent wire transfer claim with Bank of America that was denied. At the same time, I filed a police report with my local police department. In an effort to investigate and identify the suspect, the detective has issued multiple search warrants to the bank.
However, the bank has not responded to these warrants.
My question is: are banks required to comply with search warrants issued by local law enforcement, and if so, what typically happens when they do not respond or delay compliance?
Any insight would be appreciated.

Liberty has been offshoring and getting rid of entire departments quietly since they announced the “don’t go make a 10 year career plan here” back in Oct of 2023. They have cut the inbound subrogation department in half over the last 7-8 months using PIP plans and forcing a small handful of employees to make lateral moves to other depts. They’ve offshored all jobs cut to India. The company has been trying to keep things quiet with secrets everywhere. The Team Managers have been traveling all over the country for “quality training”. Constantly talking about focusing on quality which is just a smoke screen for putting people on PIPs for weak reasons to get out of paying severance and unemployment. They will cut the inbound subrogation department down to about 25-30 people state side and then might do an outright layoff of them because this whole department is being offshored to India while they try to continue to innovate with their AI. There are constant organizational changes being announced. This company’s “record profits” are coming from the selling off of foreign assets and not because of their premiums. There have been talks about customers being charged in full for policy period premiums and then having their policies cancelled a week or two later with no refunds given. The company is current being sued for undervaluing auto total loss and home owners claims (which they have been). They made changes to metrics at the start of the year to make them harder to meet when inventory is low, because they’re setting everyone up for failure. This company is going to lose insane amounts of money on those total loss and home owners laws suits. Why those running the company would risk PIP’ing so many employees, when they’re already involved in all these other lawsuits and can’t take the blow back or bad PR from those, let alone from the mess they’re making out of downsizing/offshoring jobs is definitely a unique choice to make. Will anyone really be surprised if there is another lawsuit soon from all the Swiss Cheese PIP layoffs? This company is a sinking ship and anyone working there should look for something else.

ExxonMobil shareholders voted to move the company's legal home. The state of incorporation will shift from New Jersey to Texas. This decision concludes a corporate tie to New Jersey spanning over 140 years. It is a legal change, not a physical relocation of its headquarters or operations. The company cited Texas' business statutes and legal environment as reasons.

https://www.ecoticias.com/en/exxonmobil-is-leaving-new-jersey-as-its-legal-home-after-more-than-140-years-and-what-matters-isnt-the-new-address-but-what-it-signals-about-taxes-headquarters-power-and-corporate-strategy/33268/

Citi and Jane will do anything to get the CO removed

https://www.investmentnews.com/regulation-legal-compliance/ex-citi-executive-sues-bank-citing-trump-account-concerns-and-retaliation/267056

Is it just me or are corporate and the shareholders launching a massive psychological warfare campaign against all of us? Think about it...They have put some odd 60k of us and our families on notice. On notice to find another job. On notice to cancel our summer family vacations. On notice to cancel any upcoming major purchases. On notice to cancel any summer moves out of the area while the kids are out of school. Etc...
Now we don't know how many of us will be laid off either voluntarily or involuntarily because they won't tell us that either. But, for the sake of argument, let's say that it will be 10k people total. That means that the other 50k people who will be left after the carnage on September 1st had all of their summer plans and purchases ruined for no reason at all. This is not to even mention the level of undue terrifying mental duress, financial problems, and family trouble this will cause for 50k people that had nothing to do with this layoff in the first place. And guess what? They aren't even going to tell us whether we are the ones that are "safe" or the ones on the chopping block until the first week of August.
I think we all need to start consulting with attorneys.

Thoughts re: Corebridge Financial terminating as a legal entity when it is absorbed into Equitable Holdings?

Did anyone else receive an email about a class action lawsuit regarding medical solutions and the 401k?

The U.S. Justice Department has reportedly sent subpoenas to several of the country’s largest banks, including JPMorgan Chase JPM and Bank of America BAC, over allegations of politically motivated account closures.

Other banks under investigation include Wells Fargo WFC.

Some of the subpoenas were issued to the banks last year by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., led by Jeanine Pirro. The probe is focused on claims that these banks have “debanked” clients, meaning they have inappropriately closed customer accounts due to political reasons, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/jpmorgan-bofa-wells-fargo-subpoenaed-by-doj-in-trumps-explosive-debanking-crackdown-report/ar-AA25nPc6

I have an ADA protected disability accommodation allowing me to WFH despite being within hub radius that has been approved for the last couple years.

My manager asked me what I’d do if “it weren’t granted this year”. I told him I’d pick a paycheck over homelessness and that I’d do whatever I can to work somewhere else as fast as possible.

Is there a push to deny ADA accommodations? Is this even legal?

https://www.haystack.tv/v/man-sues-agencies-arrest-ai-facial-recognition-mistake

It used to be formal layoffs with packages were the only thing to worry about. Now they're moving toward firing people individually. I personally know three people let go for reasons that made no sense. One had fine reviews but was told their performance was poor. Really? I hope they talk to a lawyer.

Just heard that Verizon is reducing vacation accrual caps to 125% from 150%? Is this legal in California?

We didn't pay over 1.5 billion in bills . How is this legal? Many of the smaller vendors we had got paid zero. For their merchandise. Meanwhile raemdonck went in CNBC .where if course they didn't mention that

I see it’s lit over here lol!

Someone posted this on the UHG link for the layoff. Did anyone know about this?
https://www.thelayoff.com/post/@OP+1ktq0j4m3

Basically they are saying UHG-Optum-UHC utilizes forced arbitration which is generally deemed not good for consumers or employees. When did they start doing this? Apparently most large companies do this but several like Google, Uber, Airbnb and others have stopped doing it.

UHG uses forced arbitration. If you don't know what it is and how it impacts the public, consumers, employees, etc. Look it up! Here is a link you can start with, but there's a lot of information on it out there. Stay informed and know your rights. Also check your State Laws, as certain States have counters to the use of it. Knowledge is Power.

https://www.epi.org/publication/the-arbitration-epidemic/

Media Matters, a progressive media watchdog, has undergone layoffs and cost-cutting measures. The organization faced significant financial strain from a costly legal war. This legal battle was waged by Elon Musk. President Angelo Carusone determined difficult cuts were necessary for the non-profit. Layoffs were implemented after discussions with employees.

https://www.status.news/p/media-matters-elon-musk-lawsuit-layoffs

Common (and Sometimes Nefarious) Practices with LLC/Entity Changes
Changing an LLC—through formation of a new entity, asset sales, mergers, conversions, or “successor” setups—can create separation from prior liabilities. Legitimate uses include limiting personal exposure (via proper formalities like separate finances and operating agreements). However, abusive tactics include: 
• Forming a “new” LLC or shell entity and transferring assets: The old entity is left with debts/liabilities (sometimes leading to bankruptcy or dissolution), while the new one continues operations with a “clean slate.” This can attempt to evade contracts, judgments, or union obligations. Courts may “pierce the veil” if there’s commingling of assets, undercapitalization, fraud, or treating entities as alter egos. 
• Asset sales vs. stock sales: In asset purchases, the buyer may argue they’re not a “successor” bound by the old entity’s union contracts or liabilities (unlike stock purchases, where the entity identity often continues). Nefarious versions involve structuring deals to minimize continuity while keeping operations, workforce, and customers largely the same. 
• Using shells or related entities: Creating multiple layers (e.g., holding companies) to obscure ownership, fragment operations, or shift liabilities. This is sometimes used in union contexts to claim no bargaining obligation. 
• Rebranding/restructuring to reset terms: Announcing a “new company” to pressure renegotiation of wages, benefits, or seniority.

I was laid off in April and I did something stupid! My network connection was not cut immediately and I e mailed my resume, my reviews and also some reports I used to produce to my home e mail. The purpose was to prepare myself to interviews.
Now somebody from CSIS e mailed me to talk regarding this…

Now- is there any example of severance not being paid due to this? I will have a zoom call with them to explain, but should I start looking for a lawyer in case they do not pay my severance? Would Citi go to the hassle of lawyers for a situation like this?
Pls ease my mind…
Thank you

https://share.google/LaNSdgZJxVmNlINzW

Is there anything less American than this? F this company... How is this even legal?

If Factset is a WARN company, shouldn’t they have announced layoffs? Last Sanoke dodged the question. Secondly, under WARN act shouldn’t Factset have given us the term date of 90 days later?

CDF Labor Law will host an online webinar on June 18, 2026. It offers practical advice for handling workforce reductions. The program aims to minimize legal risks and compliance traps. Attorneys Todd Wulffson and Alessandra Whipple will present the session. This event targets employers, HR professionals, and in-house counsel.

https://www.cdflaborlaw.com/events/cdf-webinar-less-layoff-litigation-pro-tips-for-conducting-reductions-in-force-in-california

I am guessing 3 years since that’s when the statute of limitations on employment lawsuit cases runs out?

The National Labor Relations Board upheld a previous ruling. A West Virginia construction company was found responsible for a labor law violation. The violation involved laying off an electrician. This electrician had complained about his paycheck. The NLRB judge correctly made the initial determination.

https://www.law360.com/employment-authority/amp/articles/2483210

I heard that a guy offered the PIL had a lawyer review the terms and there were some clauses in the PIL agreement which gave EM some rights to reduce or cancel his retirement benefits.

Are there any clauses in the PIL agreement which jeopardize your retirement benefits?

The guy I heard about simply turn in his retirement notice and skipped the PIL payments.

What are the terms of the PIL?

If you join citi after severance ended, do you have pay them back?

Many workers report being laid off, only to see similar roles reposted later. Employment attorney Chiquita Hall-Jackson calls this a "quiet repost" and sees it often. This practice can create significant legal exposure for employers, potentially leading to lawsuits. Workers should examine layoff demographics and document all workplace communications. Understanding legal rights during layoffs is crucial as job security evolves.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasminebrowley/2026/05/26/the-layoff-loophole-workers-need-to-watch-for/

Baffinland Iron Mines confirmed no layoffs are planned at its Mary River mine. This announcement came despite the company filing for creditor protection on May 15. Baffinland faces a $1 billion debt from a failed 2022 expansion effort. The company has until June 3 to repay its significant debt. Inuit associations have hired lawyers to protect Inuit rights during these proceedings.

Nunavut

https://www.thespec.com/news/canada/nunavut-mining-company-says-its-not-planning-any-layoffs-inuit-associations/article_1c65a8fa-4955-5e44-9738-1583abe0ac31.html