#innovation

Posts mentioning hashtag #innovation

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #innovation.

Mention #innovation in your post to continue the discussion!

Mr.Hill, this needs to be your playbook not what you are doing now….

Take Nike stock back to $100+. 9 steps. 2 years. No $50 million consulting firm required.

If I were running Nike, these are the nine things I’d prioritize to get our stock back above $100 within two years. No revolutionary restructuring, no 150-slide PowerPoint about unlocking synergies. Just getting back to what made Nike great.

  1. Pricing: Stop Pricing Out Our Customers

Nike has gotten ridiculously expensive. A Tech Fleece tracksuit is nearly $300, and shoes that cost $120 a few years ago are now pushing $160+. Have manufacturing costs really increased that much, or are we just testing how much customers will tolerate? We’ve spent years raising prices while making our products less accessible. At some point, premium pricing becomes corporate greed, and customers eventually walk away. I remember when we raised prices during Covid in the name of Covid, and then never returned them back to what they were before😂 Prices just keep going up and up in the name of corporate greed.

  1. Quality: Higher Prices Should Mean Better Products

We’re charging more while customers increasingly complain about declining quality. Go on Reddit, social media, or our own product reviews. The feedback is everywhere. Poor durability, inconsistent materials, questionable craftsmanship. Why should anyone pay more for something they believe is getting worse? Improve quality control, invest in better materials, and if necessary, make fewer products. A $180 shoe shouldn’t require the customer to perform their own quality inspection. It says a lot when I think of if I didn’t have the employee discount I probably wouldn’t even buy Nike because of what I’ve seen.

  1. Listen to Customers: They’re Literally Telling Us What’s Wrong

We have an endless supply of free consumer research through Reddit, social media, and product reviews. People consistently complain about sizing, quality, availability, and repetitive products. Yet somehow, our response seems to be releasing another 47 colorways of the same shoe. Maybe instead of spending millions researching what consumers want, we could start by listening to what they’re already telling us.

  1. Sponsorships: Invest in Everyday Athletes

Professional athletes will always be part of Nike’s DNA, but consumer inspiration has evolved. I can’t relate to LeBron James and his billion-dollar lifestyle. I can relate to the parent squeezing in a workout before work or someone training for their first marathon. Those are the people influencing everyday purchasing decisions. More so than ever, the younger generations are disconnected from professional athletes. I think we should maintain strategic superstar partnerships, but redirect more investment toward grassroots sports, local communities, and relatable athletes. Not every marketing campaign needs someone with a championship ring and a nine-figure contract.

  1. Sizing: Apparently, Wide Feet Aren’t Athletic

Nike says, “If you have a body, you are an athlete.” Unless, apparently, you have wide feet. For the love of God, offer more width options. Even my own parents rarely use my Friends & Family discount because the shoes they want don’t come in wide sizes. Think about that. We can’t even convince people to buy our products at a discount because they literally don’t fit. If everybody is an athlete, maybe we should make shoes everybody can wear.

  1. Protect Nike’s American Identity

Nike was born in Oregon and became a global icon through its connection to sport, innovation, and American culture. Global expansion is important, and markets like India offer enormous opportunities. But moving critical functions overseas purely to reduce costs risks eroding the institutional knowledge, culture, and identity that made Nike successful. There’s a difference between investing in India as a growth market and relocating operations because a spreadsheet says it’s cheaper. We can grow globally without hollowing out the foundation of the company.

  1. Politics: Just Focus on Great Products

Nike has created iconic campaigns by taking bold positions, but today’s political environment is increasingly polarized. Not every controversy builds brand equity, and alienating half your potential customers isn’t exactly a brilliant growth strategy. Be intentional about the issues we engage in, but focus our storytelling on sport, performance, perseverance, and community. We don’t need to participate in every political debate to prove we’re bold. Sometimes the boldest thing we can do is make a product people actually want.

  1. Employee Morale: Trust in Leadership Is Broken

You can have the greatest strategy in the world, but it’s meaningless if employees don’t believe in the people executing it. Years of layoffs, constant restructuring, shifting priorities, and limited accountability have destroyed confidence. Employees are asked to embrace the next transformation while wondering if they’ll survive the current one. Leadership needs to listen, take accountability, and rebuild trust. We don’t need another inspirational town hall about “winning together” while everyone quietly updates their LinkedIn profiles.

  1. Innovation: Remember When Nike Changed the Game?

This is arguably the most important point. Nike built its reputation on innovations like Air, Flyknit, and ZoomX, technologies that transformed entire product categories. Today, too much innovation feels niche, gimmicky, or impossible to purchase. Self-lacing shoes and foot-massaging technology are cool, but where’s the next Flyknit? And if we spend a decade developing something like Nike Mind, maybe we should make enough for customers to actually buy it. Innovation should be scalable, accessible, and meaningful. Not just something that looks impressive in a leadership presentation.

The Bottom Line: We’ve Completely Lost the Plot

I genuinely believe these nine priorities could dramatically improve employee morale, consumer sentiment, and ultimately Nike’s financial performance.

And the frustrating part? None of this is revolutionary.

Make better products. Charge reasonable prices. Listen to customers. Invest in communities. Innovate. Take care of employees. Protect the brand.

Instead, we seem obsessed with reorganizing geographies, relocating functions, cutting headcount, and calling it “strategic transformation.”

We’re rearranging the furniture while the house is on fire, then congratulating ourselves on the new floor plan. Our foundation is on fire and it seems like we are ok with that.

Nike still has one of the most powerful brands in the world. We have the talent, resources, and heritage to turn things around. But we’ve spent too long taking customer loyalty for granted, and now we’re paying the price.

Stop optimizing the PowerPoint. Start optimizing the product.

Just Do It. Seriously. Actually do it this time.


AI is still not a huge threat, no matter what some might think

Yes AI is producing huge amounts of output that none of us could produce in the same timeframe, but, and it's a huge but, most if not all of it still has to be reviewed by us, explained by us, and agreed upon by us. So yes, AI is doing some tasks, but it's creating new ones as well.


T-Mobile What’s Going On

All the layoffs and the stock is still trending downward. The stock start tanking as soon Srini took over. The plan is not working. The layoff is not the answer even though some of it was necessary for redundant roles. All the experience people from magenta era is gone. I get it you want your own legacy with no pushback but you forgot the people matter to along with the mission. What new innovation have you done since being CEO to separate you from other carriers accept for being the #CEOofLayoff. All the projects that are happening now was in the works way before you came aboard so yes you will get credit for that. I have never seen T-Mobile stock below 160 for years accept for when we went public for the first time at 134


Another day, another 13 year low for the stock price

All the cutting in the world isn’t going to make up for the lack of innovation and lack of a coherent strategy to keep the ship from sinking. End of year layoffs are going to be the new normal unless the “new” management team comes up with better ideas than cost cutting to try to appease Wall Street.


Elon trolling Stink on X

AT&T CEO John Stink: Starlink Mobile won’t be able to penetrate walls.

Elon Musk & SpaceX: We’ve acquired 800 MHz spectrum, which will allow Starlink Mobile to provide better indoor coverage, including signals that can penetrate walls and other obstacles.

C suite are underestimating Starlink Mobile.

Just keep building the fantasy factory and prison like tracking systems your employees hate you for - instead of fighting this existential threat. Bunch of m0rons in Dallas.


Pick up the Pace - AI (All Indian)

Look, it's simple. Thousands of jobs will disappear starting in January, and all we get is more corporate word salad from a deeply unserious leadership team.

Remember Craig's departure in December, followed months later by the hiring of a new CCO? Where's the accountability, consistency, or coherent strategy?

Nike's problem is Nike - what it has become under years of stale thinking, internal politics, bureaucracy, and culture wars. A brand once defined by innovation, athletes, and performance now seems consumed by executive self-preservation.

The grand solution? New "Operating Model" - rearrange geos, shift capabilities to India under Venky, eliminate jobs, and call it transformation. Is Nike rebuilding its business or hollowing out the institution that made it great? It is not an American brand. It is mostly AI (All Indian).

Meanwhile, the same executive class remains at the wheel, protecting its power and compensation while the ship sinks.

This isn't a turnaround. It's institutional decline disguised as strategy, led by people who refuse to acknowledge their own failures:

  1. Accelerate supply chain modernization efforts
  2. Organize into three geographies
  3. Establish a new campus in India
  4. Change our work and workforce

The three geographies:
Americas, bringing together North America and Latin America
APGC, bringing together Asia Pacific and Greater China
EMEA, which will continue operating where it does today
As part of this change, the APGC leadership team will be based in Singapore, and some roles currently supporting the region from Beaverton will move closer to the athletes and markets they serve. We expect teams to move into this new formation in Fiscal Year 2028.

Bengaluru: A New Nike Campus for Future Capabilities
We are establishing a new Nike campus in Bengaluru, India. India is already an important growth market and manufacturing hub for Nike, with strong capabilities and access to talent. The Bengaluru campus is a long-term investment in new capabilities and talent to strengthen how we serve athletes around the world, including in India. Full-time Nike teammates on this campus will support work across Nike, Jordan Brand and Converse.
Teammates already in India will move in phases, and the campus will grow over the next several years.

Evolving Our Work and Workforce
As we change how and where we work, Nike will require fewer roles over time.
These decisions are about redirecting investment toward the areas most critical to winning: product innovation, brand storytelling, consumer connection, sport and growth.
Again, decisions about impacted roles related to this work will begin in calendar year 2027 and beyond. Teammates affected by these changes will hear directly from their leaders, with clear timelines and support as decisions are made. Where local consultation is required, we won’t finalize proposals until that process is complete.


ai will never disrupt the industry... never

geoff and team seem convinced ai will solve all our problems. maybe if they spent a little more time talking to actual physicians and patients, they’d understand where ai is useful and where it simply isn’t.

ai makes sense for reducing administrative burden. it has a clear future in manufacturing, imaging, workflow optimization, and plenty of other areas. but when a patient needs a catheter to solve an actual clinical problem, an algorithm isn’t replacing the therapy.

the idea that ai is somehow about to "disrupt" every medical device category feels like something you believe when you spend more time in executive meetings than around actual clinical practice. ai will absolutely disrupt a lot of corporate work, including the work of executives who apparently need technological assistance just to read and respond to emails on time.

therapy is different, yep.

getting that distinction wrong can have real consequences for patients. cathworks may ultimately demonstrate that gm paid for an expensive science project, while scientia may prove to be the kind of practical technology that delivers value for years. time will tell, but apparently nuance isn’t nearly as exciting as putting "ai" on a strategy slide.


Robinhood Eating CS's Lunch

We are significantly lagging behind competitors in both digital assets and artificial intelligence. While we are late to roll out crypto offerings falsely assuming we are at the technological forefront our AI capabilities are even further behind the market.

Robinhood has leapfrogged standard API integration by introducing an MCP architecture with automated trade pre-approval and an expanded ecosystem of third-party data feeds. They are providing retail and custom developers with streamlined access to high-value data sources that were previously difficult to source and integrate:

Unusual Whales: Tracks unusual options activity ($30/mo).
SkyFi: Provides satellite intelligence and real-world Earth imagery ($10/mo).
Narravance: Detects viral stocks and emerging social media chatter ($8/mo).
Additional Providers: Includes institutional-grade data tools from Nasdaq, SpotGamma, Quiver Quantitative, Token Terminal, Carbon Arc, and Fiscal.ai.

https://robinhood.com/us/en/campaign/presents/

I'm sure they are getting a cut of the monthly subscriptions, should be a big moneymaker for them. They are also moving to 24x7 trading....

CS missed the boat as always due to mismanagement at the top... a complete lack of original strategy. All we can do is slow follow... unfortunately things are moving so fast a slow follow is as good as doing nothing.


What really happened to EMC?

No conspiracy theories here. So, what really happened to EMC? EMC was built differently. premium storage drove everything. enterprise customers mattered most. engineering carried real weight. then cloud changed infra. workloads moved somewhere else... customr buying patterns changed too. the old model got fu---d up. dell brought another op model where scale mattered more and cost control mattered even more. standardization was crucial indeed. sooooo, the integration never fully clicked. products kept overlapping. leadership kept rotating . cost pressure never let go. Innovation suffered as it was hard to do and the portfolio stayed complicated at best . meanwhile, cloud kept moving faster... I dont think there was one decision or mistake that destroyed emc. it happened more gradually. the special conditions that benefited EMC went away then EMC's market simply moved elsewhere. my 2c, may be off but this is how i am processing it.


Financial Triage Dressed Up as Leadership

Jane’s leadership has been woefully incompetent. The company hasn’t collapsed because it’s too large, too entrenched, and too systemically important to be allowed to fail easily. Instead of innovating, growing, and making money through better products, management keeps reaching for the same tired lever: layoffs. Cut headcount, reduce expenses, dress up the numbers, repeat. That isn’t innovation. That’s managing decline.


Eleven Rules of the Garage

Let’s get back to this HP! We are on the ropes but we have amazing people and ideas!

The eleven rules are:

Believe you can change the world.

Work quickly, keep the tools unlocked, work whenever.

Know when to work alone and when to work together.

Share — tools, ideas. Trust your colleagues.

No Politics. No bureaucracy. (These are ridiculous in a garage.)

The customer defines a job well done.

Radical ideas are not bad ideas.

Invent different ways of working.

Make a contribution every day. If it doesn’t contribute, it doesn’t leave the garage.

Believe that together we can do anything.

Invent.


Technology Townhall

The vibe of the townhall seemed like a 3 hr 1970s indie movie were absolutely nothing happens!
The usual cry over the ongoing demise of Chemicals business (probably the 10th quarter and still pending).

Funny that an organization that keeps talking about Decision Quality (they spend millions in building those very DQ tools) had such poor time management in their townhall that half of the VPs weren't able to present - a prime demonstration of how pathetic Technology org is in planning, management and execution!
Leaders incharge of innovation within Technology, feeling absolutely delighted about working with Universities and external parties, rather than focusing on innovating something within Shell. Unnecessary blabber about Data and AI when infact IDT are the rightful owners of it.
The sheer audacity of the leaders to say that 'there is no reorganization planned for technology', at a time when all other functions have been shaken to their core, is pure delusional if not foolishness.

Any Thoughts? Comments?


Innovation is Dead, thanks PM

All employees and shareholders need to do is watch this innovation roundtable hosted by Fast Company and featuring the brilliant incompetence of our design leader PM.

Here is the video: https://www.fastcompany.com/91608012/inside-nikes-innovation-reset

This solidifies our fate under his rule. Clueless, stuck, dusty, ready for 2005. He had done zero in his 15 months in this leadership position. Pathetic and embarrassing for our company!


What should Comcast have done

I retired fairly recently after working for CMCSA for 17 years all of which was in HQ. I am not disagreeing with comments about leaders not changing focus, product development issues or competing/over-lapping groups but what tech or product should CMCSA have "pivoted" (man I hate that word) to?

It was only a matter of time before video would die and the theme park experiment was just that. So where should they have invested in?


Seattle Seeks Economic Diversification

Seattle's mayor has initiated a plan to lessen the city's dependence on major technology companies. A commissioned report revealed that the city's tax revenue is overly concentrated in a few large businesses. This initiative aims to broaden the economic base and reduce this reliance. The goal is to create a more resilient and varied local economy. This effort is a direct response to the findings of the economic development office.

Seattle, Washington

https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2026/09/09/mayor-katie-wilson-business-community-amazon.html


Etsy Restructures, Cuts Workforce

Etsy announced significant workforce reductions, impacting approximately 12% of its employees, primarily in product and engineering roles. This restructuring is intended to streamline operations and accelerate innovation, not as a cost-cutting measure. The company reported strong second-quarter revenue that exceeded analyst expectations. Despite the layoffs, Etsy also raised its full-year gross merchandise sales forecast. The stock experienced a decline in after-hours trading following the announcement.

New York, NY

https://stocktwits.com/news-articles/markets/equity/etsy-cuts-12-percent-workforce-after-q2-beat-says-layoffs-not-a-cost-cutting-move/cZoIPhcRJek


AI Layoffs May Lead to Costly Rehires

Gartner predicts that by 2029, one-third of positions eliminated due to AI-related layoffs will be refilled. This suggests that many companies made premature and excessive workforce reductions. The research indicates that these cuts deplete talent and institutional knowledge, leading to higher recruitment and training costs. Organizations prioritizing cost savings from AI risk being outpaced by those reinvesting in innovation and upskilling. Many executives are reportedly using AI as a pretext for budget-driven layoffs.

https://www.computerworld.com/article/4220413/layoff-remorse-gartner-says-at-least-one-in-three-positions-eliminated-by-ai-will-be-restored-by-2029-at-a-higher-cost.html


Enrique the Cost-Cutter

Enrique is an engineer turned businessman. If you want to know how he treats his employees or his customers, just look at his track record. He's not a good guy, he's a good businessman. He uses all the financial levers at his disposal to increase the share price. He makes money, but it leads to eroded customer sentiment and poor morale.

He publicly defended third-party ink blockades on CNBC by stating that customers who don't buy HP supplies are a "bad investment" for the company. https://www.techspot.com/news/101593-hp-ceo-customers-who-dont-use-companies-supplies.html#:~:text=Tap%20to%20unmute.%20Your%20browser%20can't%20play,use%20our%20supplies%2C%20it's%20a%20bad%20investment.%22

He maintained software policies that remotely deactivate working Instant Ink cartridges inside a user's printer the moment a monthly subscription is canceled. That's bullsh-t, but it makes a lot of predictable money.

Executed multiple rounds of mass layoffs (up to 10%) while simultaneously authorizing billions of dollars in share buybacks and dividend increases to boost earnings metrics. https://www.pcmag.com/news/hp-to-lay-off-4000-to-6000-employees-over-the-next-3-years#:~:text=Updated%20December%201%2C%202025.%20HP%20will%20cut,artificial%20intelligence%20adoption%20and%20enablement%2C%22%20HP%20says.

Enrique spearheaded the HP+ ecosystem, making permanent internet connections, mandatory account setups, and zero third-party ink usage strict requirements for basic hardware operation.

Enrique shifted corporate resources away from core product innovation and technical support toward financial restructuring, leading long-time staff to criticize the abandonment of traditional engineering-first values ("The HP Way").


Perspective Coming from a “forced” Retired Data & Process Engineer

I think C-Suite Executives consider replacing engineers with AI as being the equivalent of replacing humana cashiers with automated checkouts.

Well, all of you engineers know that the good ones know how to not just how to handle the “normal” mold fit scenarios but also how to handle scenarios that do not fit the mold and find innovative ways to come up with solutions that most others, including AI, would.

From what I have seen, AI even struggles handling the most basic tasks and processes without an abundance of handling by their human creators. So, as to the non-conforming mold fit processes, forget about it!

Why am I posting this? Because I am so sick of all the AI hype being shouted on the roof tops. Please, can we now start having real honest conversations as to the very limited scenarios for which AI maybe can be used?


CFO needs to cut Innovation

Nike built the LeBron James Innovation Center to look like the future. And inside, they’ve apparently figured out how to manufacture the past.

The Innovation team has a pretty simple process: Start with a decent idea. Overthink it. Add a bunch of stakeholders. Rename it three times. Build a ridiculous prototype.

Make a very cool video. Put together a 75-slide deck explaining why this is going to change sport forever.

Then, after everyone has had their moment, dump it on Inline. CFO: Just Flush It. 🚽👟