#investment

Posts mentioning hashtag #investment

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #investment.

Mention #investment in your post to continue the discussion!

More bad news about Oracle's Financials

https://www.investing.com/analysis/oracle-buybacks-gone-bad-and-special-market-trading-update-200690992

But seriously, WTF does Warren Buffett know?

Re: stock buybacks over the last decade, and the reissuance this week-

"If it had saved the money for future investment instead of buying back shares, its credit rating would not be on the verge of a downgrade to junk, and it would not rely so heavily on dilutive equity issuance to fund its AI-related investments. Poor judgment designed to bolster the stock price a few years ago leaves the company in a precarious position today."


Needham cuts GlobalFoundries stock price target on valuation

Needham lowered its price target on GlobalFoundries Inc. (NASDAQ:GFS) to $55 from $80 while maintaining a Buy rating on Thursday. The stock currently trades at $40.34, down 12% over the past week and 45% over the last six months, according to InvestingPro data.
https://www.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/needham-cuts-globalfoundries-stock-price-target-on-valuation-93CH-5002822


How Can I Sell or Reallocate Cigna Stock in My Empower Retirement Portfolio?

Is there a way to get rid of Cigna stock investments in my Empower Retirement portfolio and move those funds into a different investment option? It seems to be locked, and I’m unable to make any changes.

I disagree with Cigna’s decision to reduce its workforce, and I’m concerned about the company’s future outlook and potential decline. I would prefer not to have my retirement savings invested in Cigna stock. Has anyone experienced this or knows how to make changes?


Chevron speeds ahead in Venezuela while Exxon urges caution with a ‘little pinch of salt’

While Chevron is investing $7 billion in Venezuela to double its oil output within five years, ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods again urged “caution” and said a lot of reforms are still required before any major entry into the country is decided.

https://fortune.com/2026/10/31/chevron-speeds-venezuela-exxon-urges-caution-little-pinch-of-salt/


POLL: Is the AI bubble finally starting to burst? Vote YES or NO

we might be witnessing the first real cracks in the AI bubble. Intel in the sh----r. Google raising concerns about cash flow, other tech stocks taking a hit and investors finally starting to question whether the MASSIVE spending on AI will ever deliver the returns everyone keeps promising.

so here's the poll. are we heading toward another dot-com style crash?

  • UPVOTE = YES, the AI bubble is about to burst.

  • DOWNVOTE = NO, this is just a correction and AI will keep growing.

Vote using the arrows on this post.


S&S Worldwide Faces Potential Permanent Layoffs

S&S Worldwide is actively seeking capital to continue its operations. The company warned of potential permanent layoffs if it fails to secure funding. This follows a previous notice of 70 temporary layoffs. The arts and crafts distributor has a history of financial challenges. Its future depends on securing new investment.

Colchester, Connecticut

https://hartfordbusiness.com/article/ss-worldwide-warns-of-permanent-layoffs-if-it-cant-raise-capital/


Bob Pohlad with the largest individual Pepsi stock purchase ever by an insider

PepsiCo Director Loads Up: 184,646 Shares Added in One Day

Pohlad Piles Into Pepsi: Director’s Stake Jumps 74% as the Stock Slides

The Only Insider Buying PepsiCo: Pohlad’s 184,646-Share Move

While Wall Street Hesitates, a PepsiCo Director Adds 74% to His Position


Building Sustainable Communities. Restructuring the People Who Serve Them.

Centene announced another community investment today, this time supporting housing, healthcare access, and economic stability in St. Louis. Good initiative. Seriously.

But with Q3 earnings coming Tuesday, here’s a broader question:

How does a company measure its success at building sustainable communities while simultaneously restructuring the workforce responsible for serving them?

And when the financial results improve, how much of that improvement reflects a healthier business versus a smaller one?

Community impact reports are great. I’d love to see an employee impact report with the same enthusiasm. Yeah right?!

Asking for approximately 59,800ish friends. But who really knows the true number? 👹


Nielsen IPO seems far away

These days investors only care about AI. Did the private equity miscalculated here and didn't count with AI when they decided to buy Nielsen and do their thing?

I don't think anybody will buy into Nielsen if they decide to IPO today, nobody will care, markets are hot enough as they are already.

What's the plan B?


Oracle Faces Financial Scrutiny Amid AI Expansion

Oracle's significant investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure is raising financial concerns for the company. Reports indicate that AI spending has exceeded initial estimates, prompting questions about growing debt and financing needs. Wall Street is closely monitoring whether profitability and cash generation can keep pace with the aggressive expansion of data centers and cloud services. This financial pressure mirrors trends seen across the tech industry as companies prioritize AI growth. Employees and investors are advised to pay attention to these financial warning signs.

Austin, Texas

https://media.unisba.ac.id/8926a6bf/bf38d23cZZmYPfYkB_w


October 30 LP deadline What to do?

Any current LPs planning to put their money into LP this time or pass?

I have serious concerns about where this ship is headed and am thinking of passing on this opportunity as I am not entirely comfortable having my hard earned money go to the decisions that I have no say in, leadership that has lost my trust, and firm decisions that could negatively impact my financial future. I have always been a part of LP but for the first time ever I may pass; thanks but no thanks.

I'd love to hear your thoughts about what are you planning to do?


Why is DXC's stock price going up?

Any idea why DXC's stock price has gone up from ~8 in May to ~14 now?

While we all know how the company is performing from the inside, wonder what is making investors confident that is spiking up the share price to this level?

How does just making announcements on deploying AI and making deals with anthropic alone lead to such spikes when historically the company has shown poor performance?


Even More Bad News: AI Financiers Backing Off (Axios article & link)

https://www.axios.com/2026/10/16/wall-street-limit-ai-spending-debt

Wall Street appears to be hitting its limit on AI, and financiers are starting to say the quiet part out loud: All of this AI spending doesn't look like it can pay off, at least not for everyone.

Why it matters: The gap between what it costs to build AI infrastructure and what companies are actually paying to use it is widening. Wall Street's anxiety is surging as the debt piling up to fund data centers and chips looks increasingly disconnected from economic reality.

Driving the news: A massive gap is opening up between AI infrastructure spending and expected returns.

While AI providers are projected to spend $7 trillion on infrastructure through 2030, research from Gartner forecasts they will generate no more than $3.6 trillion in related revenue over that same period.
More than $4 trillion in AI infrastructure spending could be at risk of write-downs by the end of 2032 if companies maintain their current investment pace.
Gartner also predicts that more than 80% of specialized AI cloud providers, known as neoclouds, will cease operating independently by 2030.
Case in point: CoreWeave, one of the largest neoclouds with among the closest ties to Nvidia — the AI bo-m's financial and spiritual foundation — has faced a multiday sell-off of its stock and debt.

Yields pushed above 15% and its stock tumbled 15.5% before rebounding after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang spoke up on the company's behalf.
Follow the money: Sources on Wall Street used to tell Axios that as long as the AI buildout was paid for in cash, there was nothing to worry about. But today, a third of the capex being spent on AI is coming from debt, and capital markets are showing signs of severe fatigue.

It's getting harder to secure financing. Global AI-related debt issuance plunged to $23 billion in September 2026, down sharply from $113 billion in June, per the Financial Times.
Banks are actively pulling back to avoid concentration risk, with JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon confirming his bank is tightening up on credit.
Infrastructure projects and providers are struggling: Approximately $18 billion in bank loans for an Oracle data center campus recently slid into stressed territory, while Nvidia-backed AI cloud provider Firmus shelved an IPO that sought a valuation north of $30 billion.
Zoom in: The constant spending relies on the belief that compute demand will never falter — a belief that has structural cracks.

Reflection AI co-founder Ioannis Antonoglou told Semafor that businesses may need "a decade or two decades" to fundamentally redesign their operations around AI.
That's 10 to 20 years of companies slowly adopting the technology that's being built (expensively) today.
Between the lines: This creates a mismatch: Data centers and chips require enormous investment today, but the returns that could justify that spend will take years to materialize.

Put bluntly, there is a massive gap between AI spending and AI revenue, one that won't close for many, many years.
At the same time, companies that are adopting AI quickly are getting smarter about using tools more efficiently, turning to open-weight models that are less compute-intensive to cut costs.
Reality check: Look at Anthropic's latest financials for a counterpoint to the bears.

The company is raking in cash, turning free cash flow positive in the third quarter and growing revenue nearly 50% compared to the April-to-June period.
But even Anthropic's staggering growth has slowed, albeit expectedly because trees can't grow to the sky.
The bottom line: The debt-fueled AI buildout is not an isolated problem for tech investors alone to worry about.

The stock market and economy have become increasingly tied up with the AI bo-m.
If the AI bet doesn't work, markets and the economy could falter as well.


Citi's stock is a buy

Barron's argues that Citigroup shares could rise approximately 30%, reaching $165 by mid-2027, as the bank's multiyear restructuring begins delivering stronger financial results. Under CEO Jane Fraser, Citi has simplified its operations, reduced costs, exited less-profitable businesses, and focused on improving shareholder returns. Despite these improvements, Citi remains the only major U.S. bank trading below its pre-2008 financial crisis peak. At approximately $127 per share, Citi trades at roughly 10 times expected 2027 earnings, making it one of the cheapest major banks. Some investors believe the company could eventually approach JPMorgan's profitability while trading at a substantially lower valuation.
The investment case centers on improving profitability, earnings growth, and operational efficiency. Citi's return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) is projected to increase from 7.7% in 2025 to 11.4% in 2026 and 12.2% in 2027, potentially reaching 15% by 2030. Earnings per share are expected to rise more than 60% in 2026 to $11.20, followed by another 14% increase to $12.79 in 2027. Citi's global payments business remains a major competitive strength, and the bank is gaining market share in large corporate mergers and acquisitions. Additional improvements could come from divesting its Mexican operations, reducing regulatory capital requirements, and continuing to streamline its organizational structure.
Despite the optimistic outlook, Citi faces meaningful risks, including regulatory scrutiny, consumer credit exposure, economic uncertainty, and the possibility that its stock already reflects much of the anticipated turnaround. Its credit card and consumer banking operations remain sensitive to weakening household finances, while profitability and balance-sheet quality still trail stronger competitors. Nevertheless, analysts and portfolio managers cited by Barron's believe Citi's restructuring has substantial room to deliver additional benefits. Morgan Stanley projects a $164 share price, while technical analysis suggests $165 is achievable by mid-2027. The central argument is that Citi does not need to become the best-performing bank to generate attractive shareholder returns. It only needs to continue closing the profitability and valuation gap with its peers.

www.barrons.com/articles/buy-citigroup-stock-trail-financials-3da35db6


Looking back about 15 years, AT&T has an unusually poor record to buy high and sell low

ranking of AT&T’s worst decisions

  1. 🥇 DirecTV — $67.1B
  2. 🥈 Time Warner — ~$100B round trip
  3. 🥉 Mexico — $4.4B acquisition + years of capex → $2B
  4. Selling/monetizing towers too early
  5. Xandr/AppNexus
  6. Selling data centers just before the cloud/AI infrastructure bo-m
  7. Giving up WarnerMedia/HBO/IP upside

Play nice, and give with a purpose

CNBC published “Michael Dell courted Trump early. His company has reaped rewards.” The reported sequence is:

December 2025: Michael and Susan Dell announced their $6.25 billion commitment to children’s Trump Accounts.
February 10, 2026: Trump’s investment accounts purchased $1 million–$5 million in Dell shares, followed by smaller March purchases.
Afterward: Trump publicly encouraged people to buy Dell computers.
Late May: The Pentagon announced a $9.7 billion, five-year purchasing agreement involving Dell and Microsoft software.

That creates a substantive conflict-of-interest concern: the president had a financial interest in a company he publicly promoted and whose business benefited from an agreement awarded by his administration.

Two details keep the chart from proving an improper deal:

Dell also reported exceptionally strong AI-server growth and raised its outlook. The stock’s rise cannot all be attributed to Trump or the Pentagon agreement.
The Pentagon says the award followed competition. The $9.7 billion purchasing agreement is not $9.7 billion of profit for Michael Dell.

The Trump Organization’s documented explanation is that independent managers select investments without Trump’s direction or advance notice. I haven’t verified the specific “coincidence” quote. Independent management addresses who placed the trades; it does not remove his financial stake.

The evidence establishes overlapping presidential authority and personal financial interests; proving insider trading or a donation-for-contract exchange requires evidence of knowledge, direction or an agreement beyond this timeline.


Almost < $6/Share

What did you buy your employee shares for? Ugh. Starlink doesn’t need a fiber line…like cell towers. Cell towers might become the next Fixed Wireless Internet ..too expensive to maintain…..who knows what the future holds.. Starlink putting a data center in space doesn’t need fiber lines either does it… yikes... I remember when Windstream sank below $5 a share.. then below $1 a share… and remember all those angry coworkers that invested in stock….almost seems like that was just yesterday.


Poppi: Now Available in Every Category

Nothing like watching us spend nearly $2 billion on Poppi, seeing the earnout estimate fall from $278M to $12M, and then launching Poppi Lift, Poppi Chill, and every other spin-off imaginable to make the original investment work. At this pace, it should pay for itself in a very reasonable 25 to 30 years. I’m sure the long term plan looks fantastic.


Humana Brings BlackRock In To Run 150 CenterWell Clinics

https://finimize.com/content/humana-brings-blackrock-in-to-run-150-centerwell-clinics

“
BlackRock’s HPS Investment Partners is buying Welsh Carson’s stake for $2.8 billion, with CenterWell keeping day-to-day operations and a 2028 option to buy clinics.

What's going on here?
Humana is bringing BlackRock’s HPS Investment Partners into a new joint venture that will own and operate nearly 150 CenterWell Senior Primary Care clinics.
What does this mean?
The health insurer said the new setup replaces its current clinic ventures with Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, a private equity firm, with HPS buying that stake for $2.8 billion. Even with HPS as majority owner, CenterWell will keep a minority stake and continue running the clinics day to day, while the partners add capital over the next two years to support existing sites, open new locations, and pursue acquisitions.
“


Dish Network tried and failed and SpaceX will as well!

The issues here is build out. Dish tired to build out a national network and failed for 1 simple reason. It will cost at least a 500 billion to build a national land based network that will give the same footprint as the big three. In a lot of cities, building permits for a cell tower takes 5 to 8 years to be issues. ATT, Verizon, T-mob have mature networks that have been build out for decades now. Yeah, you can come in with 500 billion in cash, but to compete head to head with the big three will take at least 20 years of building out and places like NYC, San Fran, LA... it's a 10 year process now to get a cell site build from start to finish and in NYC the cost is anywhere from 2, to 4 million just to build one cell site! Also the amount of spectrum in the 800 band is not very much and will only allow for a started build out, billions and billions more will have to be spent in spectrum buys. Dish was doomed, everyone knew it even the FCC and the SEC...! Dish was used to allow the T-Mob and Sprint merger to happen, it was the reason the merger was allowed, to get around all the SEC regs. However, everyone knew it was not possible and it failed. I am a 36 year RF engineer, at Verizon 17 years now.


The (Overdue) Collapse of $300 Billion AI Bet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V83pAnUgXS8

LE wants out of his $300 billion AI bet. But a source told Reuters ORCL "cannot terminate the lease under any circumstances.

Three months before the OpenAI deal leaked, Oracle own annual report warned it "could be locked into multi-year commitments."

This is the full story of how the man who built the lock signed one, from $288 billion of leases, to the 413 million shares LE pledged for personal loans, to the one customer it all rests on, and the date that decides it: November 23rd.


Is Medtronic selling surgical?

The move to break up digital technologies and put it inside enterprise under the CTO office, along with the surgica robotics RIf and investment in cornerstone robotics might suggest they’re eyeing a potential spinoff of surgical? Or is anyone reading it differently?


Just Tge Facts

Cromwell Long Short is the hedge fund MoA announced with some fanfare but has barely mentioned since. After raising $100 million in 2024, the fund has lagged its benchmark by about 12.5%. MoA waived fees every year — first 40 bps, then 190 bps—so the numbers are inflated. The firm has now started charging a lower 170 bps fee.

That $100 million was the largest single account MoA has ever won and played a role in Rich becoming CEO. Even so, the client has pulled about $40 million over the two years, roughly a third of the original capital, despite 32% returns since inception. Those redemptions are the real reason the firm has gone quiet on the fund.

Cromwell Long Short is a quant fund or they use 3rd party quant model to get buys and sells. Supposedly MoA shares fees with the model provider. Results kind of speak for themselves.

Hey, Ai. what are the odds? ...fees remain a headwind. Gross expense ratios sit around 2.0–2.3%; the net/capped level is ~1.70% institutional / 1.95% investor after waivers (management fee is 1.40%). That is expensive for a strategy that delivers substantial equity beta.
Assets have stayed around $90–93 million. The earlier $100 million commitment and subsequent redemptions (roughly one-third of capital) signal limited conviction. Small AUM makes it harder to attract new capital or justify the resources.


Betting on India

Let me be clear, I admire and really enjoy all my coworkers from India. They are so happy and super smart. But investing in India as a sports company is not the right move. They don’t really play any sports at all high level other than cricket. They aren’t represented in world cups, in Olympics, in any of the major sports, in fashion. VA talks about this being a big bet, but that’s exactly what we don’t need right now. We don’t need to bet, we know where our consumers are, let’s focus our resources in those areas and continue to expand there.


China strategy , CS and cutting distributors

Can someone tell me how running the same playbook that ran us into the ground around walking out of wholesale (aka in china this is a distributor model bc of mono brand retail) in the MOST RELATIONSHIP DRIVEN COUNTRY ON THE PLANET is a good idea?

Who signed off on this? Who believes the investment in own retail over partner doors a success for us so doing it now will help us?

All that will happen is those storefronts will change to competitor brands and we will lose not shelf space but PRIME RETAIL LOCATIONS,

Good god help us all.