#legal

Heard Privacy moving to Compliance. Anyone else hear anything?

https://www.monkhouselaw.com/oracle-layoffs/

I wonder how panelists would feel if they knew that the Field Reps going into their homes, and driving through their neighborhoods are not dr-g tested? Huge liability for Nielsen as many of their field employees are under the influence at work, especially in states with legal ca--abis.

Legal hold tech and ADM are going go next. SMBC will be last as it needs a major player to buy it

T will term you for something and hide it under “performance” when they have no other reason to fire you. Also, people are being fired due to inaccurate office presence reports. Get yourself a lawyer. You may have a case.

I was asked to leave last year piped out before retirement eligibility. So I got my retirement payout information from alight. You are eligible to get retirement after 50 years of age. I was told I had to wait 90 days to get my lump sum payout. I was given the deadline of Feb 26th to submit my notarized paperwork. I sent it off on Feb 3rd and waited for a check. The check was supposed to come in March. I waited for two weeks into march and nothing. I called alight and they said it was late by one day and expired. They said they would send another packet to me. When I got the packet the lump sum was not available. I called alight again and they said I canceled the retirement in December of 2025 on the website. Alight said they sent an email to my exxonmobil.com email. I told them I never received the email because I did not have access to my work email. I am now fighting them to get my lump sum payout because I want to be done with this horrible company. I did not cancel my retirement and don't know if they are just sc--wing me around so they can save money by paying me over 20 years. If they don't allow my lump sum I will sue them as the amount is several hundred thousand dollars.

By being secretive and not spooking the shareholders on the depth of the layoffs -- 18%--is Oracle management being too cute by half?

By not filing WARN (over 50 employees at one location) or information under OWBPA (Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, which applies when employees over 40 years old are laid off) they are laying themselves wide open for a barrage of lawsuits.

If asked HR & exec would be compelled to admit that they defined the specific criteria for advancement to senior roles at OVV. One of the criteria was female or visible minority. Can't undo that slide.

Illegal in the USA for what it's worth. Definitely ammo in the right case...

JPMorgan must face Wells Fargo lawsuit over troubled $481 million real estate loan | Reuters https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/jpmorgan-must-face-wells-fargo-lawsuit-over-troubled-481-million-real-estate-2026-03-30/

If you are a U.S. citizen or green card holder and feel you’ve been unjustly treated—whether through biased performance evaluations, wrongful termination, or being passed over for promotions—especially when H-1B workers are in your team, know that there are legal channels ready to support and protect you. Your rights deserve to be defended, and you don't have to stand alone. You have a voice, and there are avenues to fight for the fair treatment and justice you are entitled to:

1. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)


The EEOC stands as a safeguard against workplace discrimination. If you’ve been unfairly dismissed or treated differently because of the presence of H-1B workers in your team, you have every right to file a charge with them. No worker should be sidelined or mistreated.

1. U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)


The DOL ensures that U.S. workers are protected against any unfair treatment. Employers are legally obligated to prioritize American workers for hiring and retention. If you’ve been bypassed for an H-1B worker or unfairly dismissed, the DOL will investigate violations and hold employers accountable.

1. State Fair Employment Practices Agencies (FEPAs)


Many states have their own agencies to fight workplace discrimination and unfair dismissal. These agencies are there to ensure that U.S. workers’ rights are respected. Check your state’s official website to find out how you can take action.

1. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)


The NLRB steps in when unfair treatment involves collective bargaining or labor issues. If you believe that U.S. workers are being dismissed in favor of H-1B employees, the NLRB can investigate and take action to ensure fair labor practices.

1. Contact Your Elected Officials


You have the power to demand accountability from your elected representatives. Write to your Congressman or Senator to raise your concerns. They can fight for your rights, bring attention to the unfair treatment of American workers, and push for legislative changes to prevent such abuses.

1. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)


It is illegal for employers to displace U.S. workers in favor of H-1B workers or to keep H-1B workers on staff while laying off U.S. employees. If you have evidence of this, you can report these violations to USCIS for thorough investigation and enforcement.

1. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)


The presence of H-1B workers from countries that are adversarial to U.S. national security can expose companies and industries to significant risks—from intellectual property theft to potential espionage. If you suspect that there’s foreign influence or other national security threats in your workplace, it’s important to report this to ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).

1. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)


If you suspect that H-1B workers or employers are engaging in illegal practices, such as manipulating hiring processes, violating labor laws, or committing immigration fraud, you must report it to the FBI. These coordinated efforts can harm the integrity of our workforce, and the FBI is equipped to investigate and bring justice to any parties involved in criminal activity.

American workers deserve fairness, respect, and opportunity. If you feel you’ve been unfairly treated because of the presence of H-1B workers, you have the right to stand up for yourself and fight for your rightful place in the workforce. Don’t stay silent—take action today, and help restore the integrity of our job market.

https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/02/sap_teradata_settlement/

This is one of the most loud and clear signals about SAP's lack of ethics and integrity. The court is finding SAP guilty!

In June 2018, Teradata sued SAP, alleging the database giant undertook a "decade-long campaign of trade secret misappropriation, copyright infringement and antitrust violations."

Teradata alleged that SAP used its strength in the ERP market to "lure" it into a joint venture in 2008 and then "quickly grab market share" in data warehousing. In September the same year, SAP tried to get the lawsuit thrown out for good, arguing it was "factually groundless."

Proverbs 26:27
“Whoever digs a pit will fall into it; if someone rolls a stone, it will roll back on them.”

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case No. 3:23-cv-252-TJC-PDB
IN RE FIDELITY NATIONAL
INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
Honorable Timothy J. Corrigan
Honorable Patricia D. Barksdale
STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

Page 10 - Individual Defendants” means Stephanie Ferris (including after
her voluntary dismissal), Gary Norcross, James Woodall, and Thomas Warren.

Can you guys stop complaining? It’s making the directors, VP, and the CEOs friends uncomfortable!

Anyone who applied for a position, but then didn’t get it-yet there is evidence of a friend, family remember, or just “someone I know” who got the job-you can file with the EOC. Chronyism is illegal in this circumstance. Easy to prove-just look up their profile on linked-in, true people, or do an internet search. Screen shot the evidence. This applies to internal and external applicants.

Just su-k it up already! You can’t get paid your incentive checks on time so that the money can go to the top dawgs.

If you make them a ton of revenue, they will fly to your location and cook you a piece of chicken. Congrats! Smile! Get back in your food line! They might even splurge and buy you a $20 trophy or print a piece of paper that says you did good.

Definition:
Cronyism—favoring friends or associates for jobs or contracts regardless of merit—is often not inherently illegal in the private sector, but it is prohibited in government and high-stakes sectors to prevent corruption, conflict of interest, and discrimination. It is deemed illegal when it violates fair hiring laws, creates hostile work environments, or involves unlawful government quid pro quo.
The Law Dictionary
The Law Dictionary
+4
Here is why cronyism is illegal or heavily restricted:
Public Trust and Corruption: In government, appointing cronies violates public trust, breaks transparency, and often leads to illegal corruption where contracts are awarded to unqualified allies.
Discrimination Laws: While hiring a friend isn't illegal, it becomes unlawful if that favoritism is based on protected characteristics like race, religion, gender, or age, creating a discriminatory hiring process.
Contract and Liability Risks: In business, cronyism can lead to illegal "hostile work environment" claims or breach of contract if established hiring procedures were bypassed to hire a friend.
Economic Inefficiency: It restricts economic growth by prioritizing political connections over innovation and skill, often violating anti-trust or fair competition laws (crony capitalism).
Instagram
Instagram
+7
In short, while "playing favorites" is generally legal, it becomes illegal when it crosses into discrimination, public corruption, or violates employment law.

I don’t want to get my hopes up, but I hope this is legitimate

https://www.nlrb.gov/case/18-CA-382050

If it is true that people who decline the offer to move to the partner will not have an opportunity to collect severance package, how is this legal?? Has anyone reached put to an attorney? The handbook is very clear…you are not eligible for severance package if you decline a position WITHIN the company. The positions being offered are NOT within the company!

Do not disclose personal or medical issues to coworkers or managers—those conversations rarely lead to meaningful support and create unnecessary vulnerability.
I have been in managerial roles; I’ve seen more retaliation and mishandled situations than most people realize. This workplace has had more issues than any company I’ve previously worked for.HR is the most heartless part of this robot city. Do not go to them. If you’re dealing with medical leave, accommodations, or any health‑related matter, remember that HIPAA and privacy laws apply. If your information has been shared without your consent—whether by colleagues, HR, or health center—that can be a serious violation. Consult with an employment attorney. With proper documentation, many people discover they have a stronger case than they expected, and HR departments strongly prefer to avoid legal exposure.

In one region, they have laid off or fired BOAs 3x (that I know of ....there could be others) within the last year.

Pattern: All women over 50. All single wage earners, worked at EJ for several years and one was getting ready to retire in September. Told the news out of the blue on Zoom calls with Associate Relations.

Simply got rid of them to bring in younger inexperienced people.

If anyone else experiences this situation, call an attorney and the EEOC.

My LMFAO this am… CDW having a collections attorney making threat calls for $400 or so owed on an employee computer purchase… over two years after I was laid off. Money must be tight.

So, if a BOA meets the Rule of 70, but has just been terminated (to make way for a younger person), can they still keep their LLP?

After getting IM in end of year review, boss put in workday a corrective action that will last couple of months .

Added 2 projects to meet a set deadline time that is impossible.

Is this a prelude to being fired for performance, or just mean you are in the list for layoff.

If fired, can you still get unemployment

If fired with documented boss personally does not like you and make life difficult for you, any possible legal action .

Any one sued Oracle for H1B retaining and Laying off US worker ? What are the steps to be followed and documents required ?

The Springfield Education Association filed an unfair labor practice complaint. It accuses Springfield Public Schools of using mid-year layoffs to disrupt negotiations. The district laid off 27 teachers and reduced two to part-time in January. The union seeks reinstatement for affected employees and financial penalties. Springfield Public Schools stated it cannot comment on ongoing legal matters.

Springfield, Oregon

https://www.klcc.org/education/2026-03-13/springfield-education-association-files-unfair-labor-practice-complaint-over-mid-year-layoffs

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal/judge-orders-unitedhealth-to-hand-over-broad-discovery-in-ai-coverage-denial-case/

US employee who was lays off. Challenging severance offer in courts. Anyone been successful?

Paisner v. Tan, Del. Ch., No. 2026-0307
Paisner v. Tan is a shareholder derivative action filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery on March 5, 2026, seeking to void an "extortionary" deal involving a 10% stake in Intel Corporation sold to the U.S. government.
Case Overview
Plaintiff: Richard D. Paisner, an Intel shareholder represented by Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP and GM Law.
Defendants: Lip-bu Tan (Intel director), other Intel board members, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and the Department of Commerce.
Core Allegation: The lawsuit alleges that Intel's board was coerced into issuing approximately 10% (9.9%) of its equity to the Department of Commerce (DOC) for "no meaningful consideration" following public demands from President Donald Trump.
Key Legal Arguments
The complaint, which was partially unsealed on March 11, 2026, asserts several grounds for invalidating the transaction:
Lack of Congressional Authority: The suit argues that only Congress can authorize a federal agency to become a partial owner of a publicly traded company, and no such law exists for this transaction.
Extortion and Coercion: It alleges the board succumbed to "well-founded fears" regarding personal and professional relationships after President Trump publicly claimed CEO Lip-bu Tan was conflicted and should be fired.
Illegal Voting Agreements: The deal reportedly included provisions requiring the government to vote its 9.9% stake as directed by the Intel board and pledged government support for sitting directors. The plaintiff argues this created a conflict of interest by providing directors with a unique benefit not shared by other shareholders.
Pretextual Funding: The complaint claims the government demanded the shares as a "pretextual advancement" of funds Intel had already earned under a 2024 CHIPS Act agreement.
The case was initially filed under seal on March 5, 2026, and unsealed on March 11, 2026, with certain confidential information redacted. The plaintiff seeks an order canceling the deal and unspecified damages.
Bloomberg Law News

So there is a lawsuit over BYOD+ which is probably going to be class action. Basically illegal bait and switching. So if you’re a rep doing this instead of upgrading their phone traditionally you are illegally bait and switching. 0 usage reports are being reviewed at 30/60/90 days. Already heard about terminations of both reps and their managers. So if you want to protect your job make sure you are presenting a quote for standard upgrade as well and explaining the price difference. There’s a reason they stripper it down to just the google pixel abruptly. So tread lightly with Samsung being back part of it

Stellantis sued Sky Auto Mall last week. The automaker alleges a $12 million financing fraud. Sky Auto Mall engaged in "double flooring" practices. This involved securing multiple loans for the same vehicles. The dealership subsequently laid off 76 employees.

https://news.dealershipguy.com/p/stellantis-sues-iowa-dealership-over-12m-loan-scheme-layoffs-follow

I hear this company is constantly settling lawsuits with the EEOC and DOL through their poor management and businesses practices. The Spielberger Law Group is handling so many cases they may just start a class action. If you’re being discriminated against for Age (if you’re over 40) or being retaliated against after FMLA leave don’t wait to go to HR and start documenting the process. Then go to EEOC and DOL websites and start the claims. Then contact an attorney who specializes in employment law.

Here’s a piece of advice for those still at Verizon: don’t hesitate to consult with an employment lawyer promptly when your management does something illegal. It’s been my experience that they get away with things because employees tend to let things slide. For example, you only have 180 days to file an age discrimination complaint. There have been many instances of management choosing an inexperienced “leadership development” candidate over a much more capable and experienced employee. Document as much as you can discreetly then consult with a lawyer. At the same time start applying elsewhere.

Making them face the consequences for their illegal behavior is the only way to put an end to it.

Looks like the unlawful termination lawsuits are starting! If you’re on this site and feel, and can prove, unjustly performance, layoff or suspect a target on your back - DOCUMENT everything right now. If more of these cases pop up you’ll have employment law attorneys just waiting for more evidence.
(This case was listed as racially motivated but to me it looks like actions that many can probably relate to)

https://www.hcamag.com/us/specialization/employment-law/employee-sues-us-bank-for-firing-her-months-after-hr-complaint/567107

Does IBM severance agreement have a revocation period after signing if you are over 40 years old

If you are a manager and have been convicted of any crime while employed at Wells. You will be terminated.

Have any non-executives and non-management who have been RIFed successfully negotiated their severance?
I also read comments here stating RIFed employees must sign an NDA. Is it worth having an attorney read prior to signing?

Hi all, I ran a second story on the lawsuit and arbitration process. Information is still very scant, but a source at Avaya alleges that it discovered a C1 document called “The Great Migration.”

If you have any insights, email me at janderson@industrydive.com

https://www.channeldive.com/news/mystery-avaya-c1-lawsuit-arbitration-genesys/813551/

To prepare for potential layoffs and job searching , I've been thinking of writing blogs about internal tools I built ( especially with AI ) during my years at Dell that has saved my org millions. Figured it might help build a strong portfolio..

Though how exactly would I write about this without compromising the company? Should I open a request to legal team and send them my drafts?

Anyone in NY/NJ have a good recommendation that was successful dealing with this God awful company?

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/attention-long-term-five9-inc-fivn-shareholders-grabar-law-office-investigates-claims-on-your-b-ce7e5cd9d98cf025

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania--(Newsfile Corp. - February 26, 2026) - Grabar Law Office is investigating claims on behalf of long-term Five9, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIVN) shareholders as an underlying securities fraud class action complaint has survived a motion to dismiss. The investigation concerns whether certain officers of the company have breached their fiduciary duties they owed to the company.

If you have held Five9 (NASDAQ: FIVN) shares continuously since prior to June 4, 2024, you can seek corporate reforms, the return of funds back to the Company, and a court approved incentive award at no cost you whatsoever. Visit https://grabarlaw.com/the-latest/five9-shareholder-investigation/, contact Joshua H. Grabar at jgrabar@grabarlaw.com, or call 267-507-6085 to learn more.

WHY? A federal securities fraud class action was filed against Five9 and two of its Officers has survived a motion to dismiss. That Complaint alleges that Five9 (NASDAQ: FIVN), through certain of its officers, misrepresented the purported strength of the Company's net new business bookings and visibility into its installed customer base, and that when these statements were made, Five9 was in the throes of a "challenging bookings quarter" due to constrained and scrutinized customer budgets and sales execution issues, forcing the Company to cut its annual revenue guidance and take remedial action to address sales execution issues.

On February 23, 2026, a federal court determined, among other things, that "plaintiffs allege with particularity that defendants knew, and failed to disclose, that Five9 was performing below its own projections and expectations in the first half of 2024." Evidence presented is sufficient for plaintiffs to plead that certain of Defendants' statements about the strength of Five9's sales, including that "the net new side of our business is very strong" and "we are seeing very strong bookings momentum on the net new side," were false or misleading, and plaintiffs allege with particularity that defendants' June 2024 statements about macro factors were false or misleading. Plaintiffs further established a strong inference of deliberate recklessness or intent to deceive with respect to certain false and misleading statements.

Is changing that even legal?

anyone remember that arbitration agreement cigna waved in your face when signing employment papers?

how to take it back