#allhands

Posts mentioning hashtag #allhands

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #allhands.

Mention #allhands in your post to continue the discussion!

New England all hands

So you want to cut expense and create more cash flow wow riveting!! And have Samsung do more work in the area. Can you say ops is getting riffed! Thanks Deane and Heidi what a great idea. Can’t wait for Samsung to f……more cell sites up…. Neeed to get the he-l out of hear before the ship completely sinks


Verizon is so back - Awesome All Hands

I know the sad folks on this forum won’t recognize the great work being don’t, but listening to Dan, Alfonso, Christina and Tony lay out our agenda and plans for the next year we’re exhilarating. I have never been more impressed and enthusiastic about Verizons direction. Best days are ahead!


Optum Tech revolving door of leaders

The previous CIO left about 2 months ago. We had All Hands to meet her replacement. We got sent an All About Me questionnaire, supposedly so they could personalize swag and we’d get to know each other better. About a month later (last Fri) the new CIO sent a goodbye email.
No one is has the wheel as we careen towards cliff’s edge.


Kristi Dent - VP-Network Ops | All Hands Meeting Today - No Layoffs

Kristi Dent (VP Network Ops) states she's not aware of any upcoming layoffs or RIFs. I'll assume she's referring to her organization specifically (Network Ops). I personally believe this to be true (based on current staffing needs). What are your thoughts?


ALL HANDS - AKA First Friday. 9/25

ALL HANDS EMAIL:

The most interesting part of this email isn't that leadership changed the name from "First Friday" to "All Hands." It's the wording itself: "We'll discuss where we're headed, how we'll win, and how we'll work together to get there." That's a great message for a company that's apparently still trying to figure out where it's headed.

Think about that for a minute. Five months ago we were told the new structure was the result of months of planning, analysis, research, modeling, workshops, consultant input, and executive alignment. We were told there was a strategy. We were told there was a roadmap. We were told this was the answer.

Now we're being told we're going to discuss where we're headed.

Those are two very different things.

If leadership had confidence in the structure, we'd be talking about execution. If leadership had confidence in the strategy, we'd be talking about results. If leadership had confidence in the decisions made over the past several months, we'd be talking about growth, adoption gains, customer wins, and operational improvements.

Instead, we're still talking about direction.

That's what should concern employees.

The most successful organizations I've been part of didn't spend this much time explaining themselves. They spent their time supporting customers, developing products, empowering employees, and producing measurable results. The results told the story. The results created alignment.

Here, it feels like the opposite. Constant explanations. Constant repositioning. Constant alignment meetings. Constant reminders about the strategy.

At some point, employees start asking a simple question:

If the strategy is working, why does it need so much explaining?

The reality is that trust isn't built through presentations. Trust isn't built through slogans. Trust isn't built through renamed meetings.

Trust is built when leadership's predictions become reality.

Unfortunately, many of the predictions made around the May reorganization have not matched what employees are experiencing on the ground. That's why skepticism continues to grow. Not because employees are resistant to change, but because they've spent months watching reality diverge from what they were promised.

The challenge leadership faces today isn't convincing people that we'll win. The challenge is convincing people that the people making the decisions actually understand why so many of the previous decisions haven't produced the outcomes they expected.

Because at some point, employees stop evaluating presentations and start evaluating results.

And that's where the real conversation begins.

Help... Cengage is sinking!


What did we talk about in town halls/meetings before AI?

Every call is about AI and how it’s not replacing our jobs, just our tasks or how it’s not doing our job better, just making us more efficient.

It’s the same thing every call. Don’t we have other things to talk about that are more important?


What are Verizon's top 3

So Dan's been here a Year... can anyone provide top 3 goals/strategies that is being implemented for Culture change?

I sit through All Hands and leave clueless.

Sampath at least repeated each session.

Strayer University must not of taught that to Directors.


Industry Townhall Key Q&A Answers

Just update for everyone, from today's industries townhall:

No news confirming focal, hikes or promotions, but it is being reviewed.
This was asked multiple times in the Q&A with the same response.

No clear "no" on future restructuring. Oracle will aggressively keep up with the changing landscape of AI and how they are structured to delivery efficiently will continually be evaluated.
This was asked multiple times in the Q&A.


Count Hoc-ular is coming, and blood will be spilled.

It has already started. People are dropping like flies in India, just vanishing from the office and address book. In Palo Alto, directors have been presented with a list of names in a closed-door meeting last week, but lower-level managers know nothing.

Here's what I think about the US timing:

We have an all-hands on Wednesday. They will probably say something about job cuts.

Our dictator-in-chief will swing by for his "Coffin Talk" on Thursday. He will do his normal routine about profits, AI, and money, and avoid the subject of job cuts unless asked. Then he will neither accept nor deny (typical Hoc).

After he flies back to Castle Dracula, the US layoffs will begin on Friday ( 9/11 of all days) though anaonomous 9am zoom meetings.

This will likely be a rolling layoff through the fall until December.... after that, we will get the regular smaller-scale cuts through 2027.

Good luck everyone... God be with you.


Bell Labs head explicitly announced there will have 40% cut

Bell labs head (G.P.) announced that there will have 40% reduction in the whole Bell Labs, and only 6 research centres will be kept. He said these numbers are accidentally sent out to all Bell Labs researcher in a ppt, and he refused to make any explanation on these numbers. Once people asking about the discontinued Network Systems Research lab, no comments and no responsibilities but still blablabla on AI-based research. One of the most chaotic All hands in Bell Labs.

The head of Bell Labs (G.P.) announced that the lab would lay off 40% of its staff, retaining only six research centers. He claimed these figures were mistakenly sent to all Bell Labs researchers in a PowerPoint presentation and refused to offer any explanation. When asked about the disbanded Network Systems Research Lab, he neither responded directly nor took any responsibility, yet continued to discuss how AI could be used research blablabla.
This was the most chaotic all hands meeting in Bell Labs' history.

Sadly but Marcus Weldon is correct on what the new TAO is doing:
https://www.lightreading.com/business-transformation/nokia-s-former-cto-rages-at-shocking-bell-labs-cuts