#compensation

Posts mentioning hashtag #compensation

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #compensation.

Mention #compensation in your post to continue the discussion!

2026 Compensation cycle email

“We base pay on labor market trends—not cost of living—so your compensation reflects your role’s true market value.”

Ok fine, but does anyone else see the idiocy of paying Stankey 26 million then? Based on what he’s done to once-proud AT&T he wouldn't get half that money at any other company in the world! Zero chance.


1% raise after a “historic” year

Just a 1% raise after the executives were boasting about how great of a year we had. They are probably thinking we should be grateful we got a raise at all. Were are all of the profits going??? Oh yeah to the executives who don’t actually do anything, while us individual contributors who do the real work get literal pennies compared to them


You know what su-ks?

Having to deal with constant reorgs, layoffs, an increasingly toxic culture, shrinking benefits, and all the other nonsense would be easier to swallow if we were at least paid well. Instead, we’re paid less than most of our competitors, which just adds insult to injury. There’s no upside to working here. None.


Meets? Expectations

Another year of going above and beyond with no reward, doing all the things picking up slack for team mates and being held to a higher standard than others, taking on extra work and still just meets and no financial or professional reward or compensation. I’ve been here 7 years and I’m tired of the bs


Why Dell Is Signaling It No Longer Values Sales

  1. Capped earnings — introducing plans where up to 60% of payout is effectively unreachable.
    1. Rigid RTO mandates — reversing years of successful remote performance with no clear productivity rationale.
    2. Artificial gating — 50% storage gates that suppress commissions even when deals close.
    3. Unattainable quotas — targets set beyond realistic market conditions to control compensation expense.
    4. Remote = stalled careers — limiting promotions for employees who remain remote despite proven results.
    5. Frozen pay growth — eliminating merit raises regardless of performance.
    6. Commission erosion — reducing or eliminating commission opportunities that once defined sales roles.
    7. No in-role advancement — blocking progression within current positions, removing career pathways.
    8. Constant quota changes — moving goalposts mid-year, undermining trust and planning.
    9. Vanishing checks — commission statements that frequently fail to reflect closed, booked business.

Performance and Raises

Given that I was rated as “met expectations” across the board, identified as a core performer, and am contributing to a high-performing team, I wanted to better understand how compensation increases are typically evaluated for employees with under a year of tenure. I recognize that I have the least tenure on the team and that this factors into current pay alignment.

I also wanted to confirm whether compensation discussions are normally part of the performance review process or handled separately, as it wasn’t covered in my review.


Salary disparity

It feels like SAP layoffs are just a negotiation tactic to keep salaries low at SAP.

The gross median income in Germany is around €52000 per year. And this includes bonuses.

Christian Klein's salary is €800,000 per year and he gets a bonus of €18 million or more.

So Christian Klein makes in a day what an average German makes in a year.

If we didn't have a CEO, we could have had 365 colleagues who could have added a lot more value to the company.

I understand that Christian Klein is a CEO of a large public company and he has responsibilities. I believe his salary is quite inflated and he should not get so much. And it is mind blowing that he gets so much bonus.

If there is less budget for salary and benefits, surely SAP can save money by paying the executives less. So why are they not doing that?

Also, the share buyback calculation seems off. To be able to buy back so many shares, SAP will have to lay off between 10000 and 15000 employees worldwide. For a company where employees are already overworked and underpaid, it doesn't make sense to buy back so much stock.