#ai

Time of year I get my checkups done. Of the 3, 2 went straight to AI schedule the appointment. Mentioned it to the receptionists when I arrived. 2 of the 3 had no idea it was implemented at their business. Just noticed the call volume seemed to be down. Wondering how many businesses are using this without making everyone aware that it was taking some of the work from them?

https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/was-amazons-tokenmaxxing-fiasco-behind-claudes-500m-mystery-bill

That's great. That's great.

Seems like the sort of thing that could happen at MetLife as they try to measure who is "doing" AI.

Cracks are starting to appear in the AI will save us so much money narrative.

https://www.businessinsider.com/google-ai-cost-tokens-gemini-flash-openai-anthropic-gemini-search-2026-5

I left Dell but retained the stock.I see the Trump admin gave a big DoD contract to Dell that should have gone to Microsoft. The result is a 30% increase in the stock price.

I have no inside knowledge, but with most of the earnings coming from AI servers and services - how long before they spin off the PC and accessories business like IBM did some decades back?”

After reading another headline article on a big media website, it got me thinking about AI use here at COP. I wanted to take a poll of how or if AI has changed your job in any way. Who is and isn't using AI tools? What is the roadmap for implementing tools to make your day more efficient? Do you foresee any jobs at COP in O&G being lost due to upcoming AI tech?

As we spent the last decade offshoring and laying off our vteam family, I was energized and excited to learn how AI unlocked is how we scale our most important investment - our people! This is such impactful work. Because when the Vteam thrives, Verizon thrives - together!

There is no question AI is changing how we work, but emotional intelligence will always shape the why. The future belongs to organizations that value both. AI is the how. EI is the why. And nobody cares about people like Verizon. I am very grateful to be part of this best in class culture OS! Let’s go team!

Box CEO Aaron Levie highlights a growing disconnect in Silicon Valley regarding AI. He states many tech executives misunderstand AI's full scope and practical challenges. CEOs often see only the "happy path" of AI, ignoring the extensive work required for sustainable results. This limited view contributes to widespread tech industry layoffs. Companies like Meta and Wix have recently reduced their workforces, partly attributing cuts to AI efficiencies.

https://fortune.com/2026/05/29/box-ceo-aaron-levie-ai-psychosis-jobs-layoffs/

Fintech unicorn Rapyd is undergoing a major restructuring. It is laying off employees as part of this process. CEO Arik Shtilman announced a shift to an AI-driven business model. This change aims to make the company faster and more efficient. Dozens, potentially over a hundred, workers are affected by the cuts.

https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/h1r00jfrgzl

Alright now that I have your attention, what are the odds that we can use the pope’s recent encyclical about ai to have a religious exemption for using Eliza? While most of us already oppose Eliza and don’t use the sh--e, why couldn’t we put in a religious exemption against their tyrannical master plan and put a stop to all of it? If they want to challenge us on it, I’m sure there would be a juicy settlement headed our way right? Just some thoughts

If Career Connect, AI, outsourcing, rankings, and reorgs are all wildly successful, what does the ideal Exxon employee of 2035 actually look like?

https://www.bankingdive.com/news/wells-fargo-ceo-scharf-ai-employment-banking-jobs/821368/

What would happen to the quarterly earnings if a company rack up $500 million in AI token fees telling their employees to use AI and AI tokens?

Cengage implemented a restructuring plan known as "Project Foundry," cutting approximately (24\%) of its workforce. The strategy focuses on restructuring the company into an "AI-native" organization, transitioning merchant outreach roles to AI voice agents, and coinciding with the resignation of the Chief Operating Officer.

Rawul made appearance, got a hour of his sports franchise to work at DXC.

He wants everyone to AI up for no pay.

Whilst his racking in the money everywhere, how does that work?

….mid March. Seriously, Dan be like ‘AI efficiency” and ‘we must tighten our belt and layoff’ and we’re still sh---y. Pay me Danny boy. You made a sh-t deal with the unions but have always paid us. All that moolah you got saved should be coming back to us. Sh-t, even throw the union some type of bonus for bending over on a bad contract.

Also that voice changer stuff is racist as he-l.

Fear of AI is at an all-time high. Not fear of a Skynet-style superintelligent singularity seizing power, generally speaking, but of something perhaps just as horrifying: that life under capitalism continues much as it always has, with one key difference — AI has made human labor obsolete.

A new survey by consulting firm Mercer polled nearly 1,000 executives across the United States. A jaw-dropped 98 percent of them said they have major organization design changes in the works around AI, while 99 percent expect AI will lead to layoffs over the next two years.

The Mercer report, first covered by TechSpot, also found a collapse in worker wellbeing as talk of AI dominates break rooms. In 2024, Mercer worker’s sentiment found 66 percent of employees surveyed said they are “thriving” in the workplace. By 2026, that number had fallen to just 44 percent.

At the same time, the number of workers who report being “unsatisfied” has skyrocketed, with over 20 percent of workers surveyed admitting they’re “unsatisfied but… don’t have a choice at this point and will be staying for the next 12 months​.”

How human resources managers plan to combat this workplace fatigue — symptomatic of a rapidly decaying labor market, not to mention stagnant wages across the board — is equally alarming. In the next two years, 49 percent of HR professionals say incorporating worker sentiments with behavioral data will become “critical” to managing labor on the job. A further 44 and 43 percent said the same of always-on surveillance platforms and AI chatbots, respectively.

To the business owners and corporatists of the world, this is the point of AI: to discipline human labor. That’s the large-scale economic process by which capitalists undermine workers’ bargaining power, through systemic mechanisms like debt, the so-called gig economy, unemployment, deskilling — and, according to some theorists, even the nuclear family.

In the workplace and outside of it, AI boosts these mechanisms, eroding workers’ power to demand change or even hold onto basic concessions like healthcare and pensions — labor rights begrudgingly pried from corporations after decades of workplace struggle.

The technology doesn’t even need to be particularly effective to achieve any of this. Business leaders like Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke are already using AI to squeeze more value from their workers, while venture capitalists use it to pry equity back from theirs. In some cases, managers are even using AI chatbots to decide who to fire.

In all, the picture is pretty grim. The richest men and women in the world have made it abundantly clear why they want AI. The tech may not be living up to their wild expectations quite yet, but they’re still unleashing it without hesitation. The only question is how workers respond now, before that hellish dystopia we all fear becomes our reality.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/99-percent-ceos-workers-ai-survey

You may now understand why employees' dissatisfaction at Dell sunk and will keep sinking.

Clown show continues! How that bozo got anyone to hire him is beyond comprehension.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sol-consulting-launches-solassist-expanding-ai-acceleration-practice-with-former-xerox-executives-302782293.html

IBM's targeted version of Mythos.
Once again riding coattails and scavenging scraps.

https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/ibm-open-source-security-ai-project-lightwell/821348/

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2026/05/28/ibm-to-spend-5b-on-new-cybersecurity-platform-for-enterprise-customers.html

That Dhivya has updated her email signature to be Dhivya(i) to hammer home the theme of AI prioritization.

San Francisco-based Webflow announced layoffs on Wednesday. Employees were abruptly locked out of company accounts without warning. CEO Linda Tong stated AI tools transformed website development. This prompted a difficult decision to restructure the team. The exact number of affected workers remains unclear.

San Francisco, California

https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/webflow-layoffs-tech-san-francisco-22279561.php

ton let it slip that the company is exploring the idea of squeezing engineering teams down to 4, with the rest of the team being suplimented with ai

if you are in a team of size 5 or more, your head is likely on the block

On Monday, June 1st, Copilot moves to token-based billing with major adjustments to token-cost multipliers. Some models will cost 60x more per token than others. Most of what users would call the "useful" models will become exceedingly expensive in comparison to the others.

Guess I’m finally going to start using AI as much as Sandeep has begged for.

Get ready to open your wallets, you d-mb fu--ing ghouls.

Whenever we find a new way to be more efficient or prodctive the benefit never goes to the employee doing the work.

Mgmt will use it to increase output, cut heads, or dump more work on whoever is left. Nobody in leadership is sitting around saying great, now employees can work less… They are asking how much MORE $$$$ they can squeeze out of it.

Workers only get a share of the gains when they have leverage.

Usually, that means, bargaining collectively.

Now let the downvotes come.

We are doing it to ourselves…

So five years from now when AI is a huge failure what will corporate America do? Will all the leaders pushing it try to gaslight us into thinking they weren’t 100% behind it? Will they tell us it was just an experiment and they didn’t push it? Will companies start rehiring all the people they laid off? I want to see people claim they knew it wouldn’t work and they fought to keep people employed.

Because the pope published an encyclical about AI can I cite religious concerns as a reason not to use it at work?

It might actually be good for truist when the llm circlej bubble pops, as they haven't been able to waste that much money on it yet.

Anyone that thinks ai is "good" for most of the tasks for which it is being proposed, fundamentally does not understand what it means to be human, nor do they understand ai beyond "I need to gobble and push this to keep my job." Dogsh!t code, lies constantly. If you are an expert in your field and quiz it, this becomes apparently immediately.

Join Truist Luddites Anonymous today.

Tech Firms and Large Employers just now realizing cost of compute is higher than paying human workers.
Nvidia VP Bryan Catanzaro told Axios that for his team, compute costs now run far beyond what his employees cost. Uber's CTO burned through his entire 2026 AI budget on coding tools alone — and that was by April. (Axios)
OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger claimed that his team spent more than $1.3 million in token costs in just a single month. Because of this, it’s now apparent that using AI is more expensive than hiring people, especially since it offers only limited productivity gains at the moment.
Despite no clear evidence of AI improving productivity and no widespread data supporting the idea of AI displacing jobs, big tech firms have committed $740 billion in AI capital expenditures this year — a 69% jump from 2025. That spending has coincided with more than 92,000 tech layoffs in 2026 so far. (Fortune) So companies are simultaneously spending more on AI, laying people off, and discovering the math doesn't pencil out the way they projected.

Phoenix has been a major hub for low-paid office jobs. These cubicle-based roles included customer service and data entry. Such jobs provided a path to the middle class for many workers. Now, offshoring and artificial intelligence are causing these jobs to disappear. Thousands of local workers in Phoenix face an uncertain employment future.

https://www.wsj.com/economy/phoenix-built-an-empire-of-cubicle-jobs-ai-is-coming-to-tear-it-down-fb64bb68

At least somebody’s saying it like it is.

Since we are AI all in lets replace the Board & Ceo with AI. Lets lead by example instead of always being a follower.

The management is chanting "AI" in every meeting, even the office plants know the next layoff is coming soon. Stop waiting for the axe to cut your head. If you’re eyeing the exit, get your interview script ready. If you’re worried about the bank account, find a side hustle. If you’re the sharpest technical mind in the room, stop fixing your manager's broken Excel formuls, let them figure out how to "AI" their way out of a circular reference. If you possess knowledge within your team that others do not, stop sharing it; Your kindness is pushing your own head into a noose.

@b9+1kr2g8fby is 100% right.

State Senator Michelle Hinchey proposed the AI Labor Information Act. This bill requires large New York employers to report AI-related job losses. Businesses with 50 or more employees would disclose positions replaced by AI. The proposal also tracks human work hours remaining after AI integration. The bill is currently advancing through legislative committees.

https://www.timesunion.com/capitol/article/ai-labor-bill-new-york-legislature-jobs-22275358.php

Meta announced 1,395 layoffs in the Seattle area on May 20. These cuts affect approximately 20% of the company's Washington workforce. The layoffs are part of Meta's strategy to offset significant AI investments. Affected employees include technical writers, data scientists, and engineers. Their last day of employment is expected to be July 22, 2026.

Seattle, Washington

https://www.fox13seattle.com/news/1400-seattle-meta-jobs-layoffs

Cold....hard.....facts. Their massive AI Infrastructure-Related Securities Suit aside.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zECyMRI8sV4

1 By partnering closely with NVIDIA, Dell successfully secured a front-row seat on the AI wave.
2 By backing Donald Trump, Dell gained political support and substantial government orders.
3 By distancing the company from China and giving up part of the Chinese market, Dell earned strong trust from Trump and his allies.
4 Through quiet but decisive and continuous layoffs, Dell has consistently reduced costs.
5 By shifting operations toward India, Dell has maintained product competitiveness.

I mean, once AI gets exposed as an overhyped, expensive, hallucinating toy?

How much more do you think the company will shut down with GTP coming online?

Survey reveals that 99% of CEOs now expect AI-driven layoffs — companies are racing to replace junior workers with AI, even as many executives remain uncertain about the returns on AI investments | Tom's Hardware

Survey reveals that 99% of CEOs now expect AI-driven layoffs — companies are racing to replace junior workers with AI, even as many executives remain uncertain about the returns on AI investments

A recent study by consulting firm Mercer has revealed that an unprecedented 99% of CEOs envision AI-driven layoffs in the short term. The survey, which covered 12,000 C-suite executives, HR leaders, employees, and investors, showed that an overwhelming majority of executives expect AI "to lead to at least some headcount reduction in the next two years." At the same time, work and economic anxiety are increasing among employees, while workplace well-being has plummeted, with the portion of workers reporting that they "feel good at work" dropping from 66% in 2024 to just 44%.

The report also revealed that young professionals, aged 22 to 27, face the highest risk of job displacement as CEOs target simple tasks that typically served to train new hires. Because generative AI excels at codifiable, routine entry-level tasks, companies are slowing down traditional junior hiring pipelines. Standard Chartered recently announced plans to cut 7,000 jobs to replace ‘lower-value human capital’ and focus on automation.

Confirming the trend is another report from the consulting firm Oliver Wyman, based on a global survey of CEOs. The Oliver Wyman report revealed that the number of companies actively reducing junior/entry-level roles spiked from 17% to 43% in a single year due to automation.

Whether massive AI adoption and the resulting trends are worth it remains to be seen. Around 40,000 tech industry employees lost their jobs in the first quarter of 2026. Despite such trends, the Mercer report found that only 32% of surveyed executives believe their companies can effectively combine human labor with AI systems, even as they heavily push for AI to maximize return on investment.

Oliver Wyman’s report shows that AI was a top-three priority for most CEOs, with more 90% confirming the deployment or intention to deploy AI in their companies. Conversely, more than 50% say they can’t yet tell whether this AI deployment is actually delivering on the expected productivity gains.

A mere 27% of CEOs said the return on AI investment had actually met or exceeded expectations, down from 38% the previous year. Nearly 25% said they had seen absolutely no impact on revenue. The report suggests that the realities of redesigning entire workflows may be curbing AI enthusiasm, even as the worrisome trends continue.

While massive corporations like Amazon, Accenture, and Meta continue to announce thousands of job cuts tied to automation, macroeconomic data reveal a more complex narrative. Data highlighted by Fortune shows that automation-driven layoffs have frequently failed to deliver promised financial returns or measurable productivity gains.

Another interesting narrative is an AI smokescreen. Reports from labor analysts like Challenger, Gray & Christmas indicate that while AI is the most frequently cited reason for job cuts, many experts believe tech CEOs are using AI as a smokescreen to mask deeper internal struggles, corrections to overhiring, and shifts toward outsourcing.

In many ways, the reports paint a picture of a corporate world charging headfirst into an AI transformation it barely understands. Companies are cutting entry-level roles that traditionally trained the next generation of workers, even as many executives privately admit they still cannot prove the technology delivers meaningful returns. If the trend continues, an entire generation could find itself shut out of the traditional career pipeline altogether — trapped in a labor market that increasingly demands experience while simultaneously eliminating the jobs designed to provide it.

Proponents argue that humanity as a whole has always emerged unscathed and better off after massive technological revolutions, despite initial fears and shake-ups. On the other hand, opponents argue that a zoomed-in view of the actual impact such changes have is necessary for ethical implementation. We recently reported that a Chinese court ruled that companies cannot replace workers simply because “AI can do a better job.”

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/survey-reveals-that-99-percent-of-ceos-now-expect-ai-driven-layoffs-companies-are-racing-to-replace-junior-workers-with-ai-even-as-many-executives-remain-uncertain-about-the-returns-on-ai-investments

Simple Google search
Yes, AI can actually cost significantly more than human labor. A major reason for this is that running advanced AI requires massive amounts of expensive hardware and energy, making human workers the cheaper and more economically viable option for about (77\%) of roles.Why AI Can Cost More Than HumansSky-High Compute Fees: The processing power—measured in tokens—required for complex, multi-step "agentic" AI systems can outpace the costs of human salaries. Companies like Uber have reported blowing through their entire yearly AI budgets in just a few months due to heavy infrastructure usage.Expensive Hardware and Energy: Nvidia's vice president of applied deep learning has noted that for his team, AI compute costs far exceed the salaries of the employees utilizing the tools.Required Human Oversight: AI still makes frequent errors, forcing companies to pay human workers to monitor the models, review outputs, and fix breakdowns.The Economic RealityA landmark MIT study found that it is only economically viable to automate about (23\%) of jobs. In the remaining (77\%) of cases, employing a human is cheaper, more accurate, and more efficient than relying on artificial intelligence.While research firm Gartner projects that the unit cost of running large language models will drop substantially by 2030, overall enterprise costs will likely remain high. This is because businesses are utilizing much more complex models that require significantly more processing power per task.You can read more about the challenges of AI replacing human labor in this MIT Study or learn about enterprise budget shifts on Forbes.