#leadership

Posts mentioning hashtag #leadership

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #leadership.

Mention #leadership in your post to continue the discussion!

U.S. Bank up for sale?

Very common for companies to try and reduce costs with layoffs so I do get the reasoning behind that.

However, with that said it now seems with this unnecessary RTO, mandatory low performance ratings, and a variety of other items such as a large exodus of leadership..are they setting up the groundwork to find a buyer for the bank?

In other words it's as if they don't care how miserable they have made it working for the bank because it won't matter since the goal is to reduce employee costs to make the bank more attractive to a buyer.

I mean how are you supposed to grow the business when morale is way down and your employees have no faith or confidence in the leadership.


Soooo d-mb…go ahead and spin this

So we buy WB, for $80b, sell for $40b, then watch a bidding war for it as it gets resold? Thats what you people call a genius leader. Board won’t do anything cause it’s filled with other flunkies who weren’t popular with the worker bees. If you have to tell me how great you are….you’re probably not very good at what you do.


DEI managers are clueless

They're everywhere in this company. They've ruined Unity by hiding their inability to lead. They're sacrificing hard working people to cover the as--s of those too inept to do their job. Way to ruin families Unity. Maybe you should have TRULY invested time into your employees that bring VALUE, and not some titled position.


The illusion of inclusion.

I received an email, same as all you, asking for ideas. A similar email was sent by Hans. I also gave sincere feedback during Pulse. Multiple submissions in Ideas at Work.

For over a decade, I have tenured ideas. Also for over a decade, I have cautioned leadership regarding the clear missteps that they were making. It was tempered at first, but was amplified when Hans was hired. There were many red flags.

"The plan will be presented to the board for them to approve.". Yes, that's how corporations work. Hans did the same, and how did that work out? The signs of the impending failure were obvious.

So the root of the issue are those that do the hiring of the CEO. The board needs flipped.


What the he-l?

What has it been likefor uKrewers?
Worldwide it has been the biggest cluster fu-k of a year with no regard to employees who do a lot at the coalface? Cuts galore, massive layoffs, quiet layoffs, senior leadership departing after a year. The new logo drop was done but seriously demoralizing for what has been done through the year. We all remember the FedEx scandal of 2024 ahead of 4th July. Damn, it's just a worrying and quite anxious time aboard the UKG ship.

What are your thoughts everyone? What lies ahead on this ship?


SAS has been flat for 15 years

Hate the game, not the player...

If you’ve ever tried to keep all the flavours of SAS ticking over at scale, you’d have a bit more empathy for the hiding to nothing that team is on.

The model is properly broken, no doubt. But it isn't the staff... it’s the lack of joined-up thinking from the top—pushing offers that shouldn't even exist. The top brass will nod along and say there are issues, but point out that Cloud makes us $x00m a year. And they aren't wrong, unless they finish the sentence... it makes SAS hundres of millions but it should be making us billions.

SAS has been flat for 15 years. Let me state that again, SAS has been flat for 15 years... because the mentality you have is shared by the ELT... who don't get any steer or love from Dad. The cloud offer here is a shambles of execution... across the whole company, not just the division. Let me state that again, SAS has been flat for 15 years...

With that in mind, no need to stick the boot in. We should at least be decent to one another as we shift the deck chairs around... makes the time on a sinking ship a bit more bearable.

This deserves its own thread. OP:@12j+1kbnvhbm6


The new tu-d

Which one is more accurate?

There's a fresh wa-ker strutting into town, handed the keys to International on a silver platter like he's won the bloody lottery. And what does our heroic new overlord do? Bu---r all in the way of actually selling anything, of course.
Instead, the daft sod's obsessed with poring over every sodding line in the SFDC opportunity updates, picking at them with the sort of OCD paranoia that'd make a conspiracy theorist blush. Proper control-freak territory, innit?
To top it off, he's an arrogant bellend who's being an absolute cvnt to customers (never mind the poor sods who work for him). Charming bloke, clearly.
Mark my words, this pillock's going to hammer the final nail into Avaya International's coffin. Either he'll get the boot by the end of H1 for missing his numbers by a country mile, or he'll manage to torch half the business in the process.
Frankly, I'm not convinced PD or ML give a toss about International anymore if they're willing to serve it up to this manchild on a plate. What a shower of sh-t.

.......
OR
.......

Another absolute genius has been parachuted in to run International, handed the whole bloody kingdom like he’s the second coming of Steve Jobs. And what’s his masterstroke, you ask? Sweet fu-k all when it comes to actually shifting any product, naturally.
No, our fearless leader’s true calling is to hover over every single poxy line in the SFDC opportunity updates like a proper obsessive-compulsive hawk, nitpicking with the sort of deranged paranoia that’d make your average flat-earther look well-adjusted. Top-tier management material, clearly.
And the charm! Christ alive, the man’s an arrogant, swaggering bellend who treats customers like something he’s scraped off his shoe—and that’s on a good day. The staff? Mere peasants fit only for a daily bollocking.
Give it a few months and this utter we-pon will personally drive the final, glittering nail into Avaya International’s already knackered coffin with a flourish. Either he’ll get spectacularly sacked by the end of H1 for missing his numbers by a galactic margin (shocker), or he’ll somehow contrive to incinerate half the business before anyone notices. Either way, a triumph.
Honestly, if PD and ML are happy to lob the entire region to this tantrum-throwing manchild on a silver salver, it’s blindingly obvious they couldn’t give a flying toss about International anymore. What an absolutely magnificent shower of sh-t. Well played, everyone.


Leader Travel Expectations

HBA GPs will be expected to travel 50% and other HBA leaders will be expected to travel 25%.

Couple of thoughts...

Why are we trying to induce senior leaders to leave...I thought all the ER restructuring was supposed to address that?

This seems like a huge expense for the firm with a pretty ambiguous value add. Is it enough to offset the travel coats of $20k+ per year per leader? I'd rather have that hit my bonus.


A brilliant new career strategy I've discovered

I've realized doing excellent work at Citi is frankly an outdated concept. Why exhaust yourself when the real promotion checklist involves laughing at the boss's jokes and volunteering for the flashy, pointless projects? Simply ensure you're the last person they see leaving each night. Productivity is secondary to perfecting the appearance of it.


This is just the start

I don't mean to be an alarmist, but I think it's clear we're entering a period where layoffs are used to fix leadership insufficiencies. I guarantee you these will become a regular occurrence from now on. I truly hope I'm wrong, but my old company had a similar situation, and within six months from the first layoff I was out of a job as well.


They just don’t care

Doesn’t matter if you’re in STS, CRM, CSS, RPS, etc the whole system is built to benefit the top and treat everyone else as disposable.

Leadership knows exactly how toxic it’s gotten but they just don’t care. As long as the stock price stays high and they keep getting richer, nothing else matters to them

Bumping from @43w+1k9ze46kn for being 100% on point.


Don't take on more work

Don't do them any favors. Please. Don't do the work left behind by those who were kicked out. The leadership wants you to do it. They want to see all the work getting done with fewer people so they can say, see, we were right to cut those employees. Even if those left are breaking their backs to keep this place running. Don't give them the satisfaction.


The New Verizon - putting pieces together

Here's what I've gleaned so far and I'm certainly hoping the new year will shed some.real light on things. Please feel free to add anything I may have forgotten or missed.

So Dan comes in and touts himself many things, including an authority on AI, even so much as smackin coffee lips about it at the white house.

He's uber excited for this "new Verizon" that will be scappy and non-bureaucratic, with inital claims that no other carrier will be able to easily replicate what we're going to do.

To accomplish this mastery of his mind, we obviously must have massive cuts to fund the multi-billion dollar mystery venture.

And how amazing it will be that we will be willing to miss paychecks and/or bonuses with a smile on our faces because when it's all done, it'll be the single greatest moment of our careers that we'll remember for all of time

And so far, this has consisted of a mega layoff, a declaration laden in hypocrisy that our culture must shift to starting meetings on time so we are no longer sloppy, and a story about a cancer patient who was allowed to break contract, implying that delighting our customers mean we will now be more giving to all who want/need special cost-related provisions.

I fail to see the connection. In fact, as I typed it out, I felt an overwhelming sense of nausea come over one me. Something doesn't feel right.


The sad reality

They don't care about performance. It's you get eaten no matter what situation.

Know two people with multiple write ups with written documention in insights who are still on here, their teammates on the other hand got laid off..

Beloved company is long gone. If you notice, they took away soda again.

Exactly what @a3+1kc55g9pz said.


All hat no Cattle!

I've been watching all of Dan's interviews, and attended his online Webex updates. Based on RIF execution and the substance of everything I've seen. My comment for our pretend cowboy/mixed martial arts master/Self proclaimed overachiever and coffee aficionado is: ALL HAT NO CATTLE!


Looking for tech VP insight

How is the landscape looking right now? Is it akin to the hunger games?

First thing is the cloud stuff. We were told to go full hog to the cloud so we did. Now the outages are insane, and leadership is regretting it for our area, but with on prem set for decomm, there is no turning back. Not to mention the costs are through the roof with offshore misconfiguring it and cranking up the bill.

Secondly is the AI stuff. Feels like every team is just publicly declaring they are cramming AI into everything, attempting to, and then failing and trying to cover it up.

Will Candyman actually face accountability for this disaster? I have yet to see a working demo or plan that made any sense since he took over.

I also was told yesterday that PW's organization is set to deploy "hundreds of AI agents" to production next year who will be giving us business and funding, which i frankly find extremeley hard to believe.


Low Carbon Solutions Management and Workers (Time to Go)

Folks, We all knew it was a farce from the beginning. 95% of those selected to join LCS were known to be unproductive, unoriginal yes men backstabbers.

It is time the leadership say that all from top (ex-VP to lowly minds from rando tech people with fake strategic titles) who have been an energetic part of theLow Carbon Solutions fraud be laid off.


The day Jennifer retired, the building felt staged

Friday afternoon brought the usual choreography. A polite email chain. A cake that looked like it came from the same vendor everyone uses when they want to appear thoughtful without actually being thoughtful. Handshakes, laughter that arrived a half second late, compliments delivered like obligations. Jennifer smiled the way people do when they are leaving a place they have already emotionally left behind months ago.

I remember thinking that the goodbyes were too smooth. Too clean. Like the floor had been swept already.

By Monday morning the layoffs started.

That is what made it feel cruel, not just business. The timing had the sharpness of intent. There was no breathing room between the farewell and the damage, no pause that might suggest humanity, only a clean cut that made it obvious someone had been waiting for the moment the gate swung open.

People talk about reorganizations as if they are weather. Something that happens above us. Something inevitable.

But this did not feel like weather. It felt like a decision.

Salim’s new structure was being sold as alignment, as simplification, as focus. The slogans were familiar. The language was polished. Yet the shape of it was unmistakable. Power was consolidating. Regional teams were being pulled into functions under Salim’s organization, a transfer presented as efficiency but experienced as control. In the hallways and in quiet chats between meetings, people didn’t call it a transition. They called it a takeover.

And the pattern of who benefited was obvious enough that it stopped being a rumor and started becoming something you could map.

The regional vice presidents were now clearly tied to Salim’s orbit. Soufiane ran Central West, and it was no secret that he and Salim were close. Not close in the way corporate leaders pretend to be close on stage. Close in the real way. Fifteen years of shared history, private conversations, vacations and dinners, familiarity so deep that it didn’t need to be explained. Their friendship did not stay outside the office. It lived in the room with them.

Bob ran Northeast South and had his own history with Salim, a relationship that had grown in Bellevue the way these things always grow. Proximity becoming trust, trust becoming access, access becoming protection. People called it networking. People who weren’t invited called it something else.

Under Salim’s umbrella, the functional leaders stood like pillars around him. Naveen led Field Engineering. Jon handled Field Operations and Resilience. Craig ran Customer and Stakeholder Engagement. Jeff drove Network Build Strategy and Execution. Pankaj owned Insights Enablement Strategy.

On paper it looked like a clean machine. In real life it felt like a court.

I had worked for Harlan for many years. Harlan was not a performer. He didn’t need a spotlight to be effective. He was one of those leaders who could walk into a problem and understand it from the inside out, not because he had read a summary but because he actually knew the work. He could speak in specifics and still respect the larger mission. He was demanding, sometimes exhausting, but his intelligence felt honest. It made you sharper. It made you better.

So when Harlan was replaced and Bob moved into the space he left behind, it hit me like a personal insult. Not because Bob was incompetent. Bob was fine. But fine was not the point. The point was that it didn’t feel earned. It felt selected.

It felt like the kind of choice that happens when the decision is already made before any interviews are scheduled. When the criteria is not performance or vision but belonging. Being inside the circle. Being the familiar face that doesn’t threaten the center.

That is what broke something in me. Not the change itself, but the reason underneath it.

Jeff was another kind of story. Jeff could talk. He had that smooth tone that made everything sound inevitable and exciting, like the future was a place he had already visited and you were lucky he came back to describe it. People laughed at his jokes even when they weren’t funny. People nodded while he spoke even when his points were thin. His confidence was persuasive, and that is what made him dangerous.

To me, Jeff lacked the ability to truly imagine the future of technology. He could repeat what was popular. He could package an idea. He could drive change with force. But too often the vetting was half cooked, the risks minimized, the unknowns waved away as if skepticism itself were a character flaw. He moved fast and demanded agreement, and when reality pushed back, the cost landed on everyone else.

Worse than that, he took disagreement personally.

If you challenged him, he didn’t argue like an engineer. He didn’t test the idea. He tested you. He smiled while he did it, as if he were being helpful, as if he admired your passion, and then he found quieter ways to punish you. Your name disappeared from a thread. Your project got reassigned. Your feedback became concerns about alignment. Your performance review suddenly included words like attitude and collaboration.

He didn’t have to raise his voice. He just had to decide you were inconvenient.

I remembered stories from Sprint, the ones people told when they thought nobody important could hear. How budgets were treated like personal allowances. Trips that were always justified as necessary. Dinners that were always framed as stakeholder building. Complaints delivered as if the organization existed to soothe him. And the constant sense that someone else would eventually be held responsible for whatever didn’t work.

Craig played a different game. Craig knew how to lean upward. He knew how to speak in the language leadership wanted to hear. He also knew how to keep his team in the shadows.

He didn’t protect them out of kindness. He protected them out of control. Visibility creates independent relationships. Visibility creates recognition. Visibility creates options.

Craig preferred to be the only bridge. Work traveled up through him and credit traveled back down as vague praise. He would take what you built and present it with his fingerprints on it, then later he would tell you privately how much he appreciated you, as if appreciation could substitute for acknowledgment.

That kind of leadership doesn’t just drain people. It teaches them to stop trying.

Then there were the ones everyone stopped defending.

Luis had earned his fall. Too much posturing, too little substance. Too many speeches, too few results. He always had a reason, always had a story, always had someone else to point at when the numbers didn’t match the claims. When the demotion came, nobody looked surprised. Some people looked relieved.

And John, who once said, back at Sprint, that he liked us, that we were good, that we just needed the right structure, had also been quick to blame Marcelo when things collapsed. Marcelo became the convenient name to carry the weight. The scapegoat that made failure feel explainable.

But Marcelo wasn’t here anymore. So I found myself asking a question I didn’t say out loud in meetings, a question that burned anyway. Now what. Now that you cannot blame him, what will you call it.

People were tired. Not the kind of tired that a weekend fixes. The kind of tired that gets into your bones after years of being told you are lucky to be here while you are worked past your limits, after watching friendships win promotions while competence gets cut, after realizing that loyalty only matters when it flows upward.

And the thing that hurt most was how normal everyone tried to make it sound.

They called it optimization. They called it efficiency. They called it the future.

But it felt like exploitation.

Work until you have nothing left, then watch the ones with the right relationships keep their seats while the rest of you are treated like a cost line. It makes you start thinking in ways you never planned to think. It makes you look at competitors you used to dismiss and feel a strange longing for basic dignity.

I found myself thinking I would rather pay more elsewhere if it meant being treated like a human being. I found myself imagining what it would look like to stop defending a brand that no longer defended its people.

By the end of that Monday, it wasn’t just the layoffs that changed the room. It was the clarity.

The organization had a new shape now, and it was obvious who it was built around. The rest of us were just expected to fit ourselves into the empty spaces.


More layoffs coming in 2026

The 13k that were laid off is just the beginning. There will be more layoffs coming in 2026 which will include a lot of bottom line employees. This is why it is important for front line reps to unionized. Don’t let HR and higher management try buying your silence with free lunch and scare you with them constantly showing up to your store. The company is also going to be very strict when it comes to reps, managers and higher leadership selling with integrity. The company is focusing on customer satisfaction which means they will start firing people if they conduct themselves in gray area practices.


WMFM Town Hall

There is nothing admirable about the man who trades his authenticity to climb the corporate ladder. He becomes smaller, not greater. In chasing titles, he forfeits the one thing no promotion can replace; the integrity that makes a person worth following. DC is not the leader I want to follow.


Class Action Lawsuit

Former employee seeking info about getting in on the lawsuit.. Obviously had service with EMO discount on both 3/30/24 and 7/12/24. Deadline to file is 12/18, what do I need to know and how do I ensure my settlement is as large as possible and comes straight from Stankey?


What companies really mean when they roll out AI

Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.

$30 per seat per month.

$1.4 million annually.

I called it "digital transformation."

The board loved that phrase.

They approved it in eleven minutes.

No one asked what it would actually do.

Including me.

I told everyone it would "10x productivity."

That's not a real number.

But it sounds like one.

HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.

I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."

They stopped asking.

Three months later I checked the usage reports.

47 people had opened it.

12 had used it more than once.

One of them was me.

I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.

It took 45 seconds.

Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.

But I called it a "pilot success."

Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.

The CFO asked about ROI.

I showed him a graph.

The graph went up and to the right.

It measured "AI enablement."

I made that metric up.

He nodded approvingly.

We're "AI-enabled" now.

I don't know what that means.

But it's in our investor deck.

A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.

I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."

He asked what that meant.

I said "compliance."

He asked which compliance.

I said "all of them."

He looked skeptical.

I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."

He stopped asking questions.

Microsoft sent a case study team.

They wanted to feature us as a success story.

I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."

I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.

They didn't verify it.

They never do.

Now we're on Microsoft's website.

"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."

The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.

He got 3,000 likes.

He's never used Copilot.

None of the executives have.

We have an exemption.

"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."

I wrote that policy.

The licenses renew next month.

I'm requesting an expansion.

5,000 more seats.

We haven't used the first 4,000.

But this time we'll "drive adoption."

Adoption means mandatory training.

Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.

But completion will be tracked.

Completion is a metric.

Metrics go in dashboards.

Dashboards go in board presentations.

Board presentations get me promoted.

I'll be SVP by Q3.

I still don't know what Copilot does.

But I know what it's for.

It's for showing we're "investing in AI."

Investment means spending.

Spending means commitment.

Commitment means we're serious about the future.

The future is whatever I say it is.

As long as the graph goes up and to the right.


RTO is attrition tactics, plain and simple

I find it almost comical that companies still wrap RTO in “collaboration and efficiency” fluff, when we all know it’s really about pushing people out cheaply. Add in micromanagement and a pathological need for total control, and it becomes truly demeaning and ridiculous. Utterly unnecessary for efficiency, performance, or teamwork. But then again, the substance has clearly never been the priority.


The gap between leadership and our world just keeps getting wider

Town hall became “all about me” CFO spends 30 minutes talking about himself and his wife instead of the growth, health of the company. While he was patting himself on the back for taking the job, I got 35 emails and 2 phone calls I then had to deal with so he can get paid.
OP: @a5+1kc6wprqe

Meanwhile, they are looking for ways to pay us less or push us out. Also, offshoring galore.


Everyone should start looking for a job right now

Srini made it clear that a massive layoff is coming in Q1. There is no respect for any of us. I’d be willing to bet that the layoff will happen before the end of February to avoid a bonus or stock payout.

Update your resumes start looking now and go out on your terms, not theirs.

None of those senior leaders are sitting up on that stage give a flying F about any of us.

Q1 layoff means that some of you will be training the interns that will be your replacement replacements.


How's this even supposed to work?

Half our team is gone, and somehow we’re supposed to keep everything running like nothing changed. I genuinely don’t understand how leadership thinks the same workload is going to get done with half the people. There’s no plan, no adjustment, nothing. How's this supposed to work?


Heard from the same "leader" on the same call, within 10 minutes of each other.

"This team should not exist."

"I appreciate everything you do, every day."

While showing a deck that is clearly a roadmap for getting rid of the entire group, and other comments that made it clear they intend to keep nobody from that group. It's obvious the reason they're bringing so many H1-B into the bank is that they have zero loyalty to anyone other than their paycheck.