#management

For too long useless management employees have been su-kling the te-t of AT&T, fattening themselves off of the milk of other’s labor. Let the layoffs begin so we can maximize revenue per employee and become a market based culture where you have to compete for your position and earnings in the company.

How long they can keep the lies so sweet? Each quarter blame the same issue. Really? obviously anyone can use AI to tell the problem is the management. That Ken West baby should retire...

Some in management loved to play political games in the company. Like it was fun. Why? Business isn’t a game for those trying to earn a living.

Business continuity? The “Nike intelligence center”? Emergency management? Literally millions are being WASTED in payroll and opex with people getting paid to twiddle their thumbs, while people who actually do work are getting decimated.

When is finance team going to cleaned up with official span of controls in place. AVP reporting to AVPs, directors with 1 person team. Company wants to save money, but they cant save themselves.

Good managers will do their best to learn the job so they can be an asset to the team. Good managers will not push their direct reports off on someone else because they do not have the answer and do not care to learn along with the team.

I hope everyone is well, and GK and the Management Committee - if you see this, I hope you go to therapy and heal your ruthless souls.

So be a yes person and have no opinion of your own? Kiss your bosses a$$, shake your head up and down and get in line? Definitely not a culture or company that I want to be a part of anymore, regardless of what today brings.

When stock underperformance stretches over years, restructuring no longer feels like a reset and we employees are paying for strategic failure twice...

Dealing with a boss who lies

F5 started adopting forced resignations instead of layoffs. Recently did let go 22 members and no one is talking about it.

It's very hard to choose a person from your team.

How in the heck did you get over 1700 directs ??? How

Do anybody else have a manager who pawn you off to your colleagues? As a new hire this manager responds with go ask so and so. I’m not trying to bother others who have are busy. His employees say he doesn’t have answers. That’s why he directs them to them.

When do your manager find out if you have been speaking to an internal recruiter or interviewing?

Received an email from internal recruiter for a role two level higher than me.

But I don't want my manager to know I'm speaking to recruiter or going through the interviews until the offer is finalized.

Any thoughts?

How is this BU?

I'm in brokerage, and received offer to move asset management.

Does it also have constant reorg?

AT&T employees were informed 2016-2017 about the 2020 Vision cutting 1/3 of the workforce by 2020, and no manager having less than 10 direct reports.

Verizon is cutting 25% of the workforce by 2027 (does that mean there’s another 10% left to cut?), and no managers with less than 7-8 direct reports.

and among those upper/middle managers trying to claw their way up the ranks and leaving a trail of bodies. Too many a$$holes agreeing to whatever they think their higher ups want to hear. Of course, pointing to whatever is convenient to blame when their plan doesn't work.

My manager apologized to me for the poor bonus and raise and he indicated my compensation has nothing to do to do with my performance last year, which was outstanding. He said this is what he was given, would habe loved to give everyone that deserved it more, but his hands were tied.

Now GK and EL to us to talk to our manager??? Why do they want to throw the managers under the bus when they have no control over compensation that has a cap.

Wow!!! Blamed to managers .

Not the workers, not the managers. Why would we? Innovation isn't rewarded. Improvement isn't noticed. So everyone just does what they've always done and nothing ever gets better.

So let me get this straight…

Leadership just rolled out a “neighborhood seating” plan to reduce coordination costs by literally assigning people to sit closer to executives. Because apparently the problem all along was… proximity?

What did we do before COVID? Walked over. Talked to people. Solved problems. No color-coded maps required.

Now we’ve got:

• Color-coded zones like we’re in kindergarten
• Executives getting prime, protected seating
• Everyone else fighting Hunger Games-style for what’s left
• And lines drawn on a floor plan like we’re zoning districts

And the justification? “Coordination costs drop when people are physically near each other.”

Translation: “We want you where we can see you.”

Let’s be real this isn’t about collaboration. It’s about control.

Also… using literal colored lines (including red) to divide where people belong? In a corporate environment? In 2026? You really didn’t think that one through.

Meanwhile, instead of investing in actual tools, processes, or fixing broken workflows… we’re rearranging chairs and calling it strategy.

If this is what “driving value through proximity” looks like, we’ve officially lost the plot.

Did everyone take their 10 minute survey and let management know how swell everything's going? Love the continous gaslighting from 1st level management to cull the remaining workforce that they could not get rid of. Lumen, the AI informers, were forced into another contract to get the NetCo sale pushed through regulatory approvals. They will use the remaining workforce, for the next 3 yrs, until they quit, die, retire or shut the lights off on themselves! Oh, and there will be layoffs along the way. They are not marketing, offering any NEW product and all of a sudden care about the "few" customers out there that really need us... yet talk about strategic abandonment based on Financials that we do not even have a grasp of yet! But let's go everybody, why are you not excited with the New GCO org and all the great things were planning? Silly Lumen, you gave away all your influenced employees with the recent sale, now your left with the seasoned veterans... let the games begin

Be sure to use your Co-Pilot (or other AI tools) at least a few times a day. This is being monitored, measured, and reported directly to your manager. This could be another way to decide who stays and who goes. Source: one of my friends who works on UHC side… their manager actually showed them this report.

Why are we paying MW over 30 million a year when he can't make decisions and just hires multimillion dollar consultants like McKinsey to run the company? Maybe fire MW and we'll really save money!

Do you know that executives are not part of the new Performance Management? I spoke to an HR colleague yesterday and she mentioned this to me. I was shocked. It seems that the automatic calculation only pertains to T1 to T5 employees. Executives in the areas are above that and their compensation is not part of this calculation. Because of this, most of them got high increases (up to 10%) in their salaries as well as more RSUs than employees. So, these greedy people are taking money away from the employees so they can get more. They are the ones that "make the laws" and employees aren't allowed to complain. She mentioned that compared to earlier years, the budgets for employee compensation was lower in ratio to executive compensation. This makes me so mad.

So here's what I shall do. No matter the consequences, I am giving my honest opinion in the Unfiltered. I know it doesn't make a big difference unless we all do it. But let us not give in to the pressure this time. If we are frustrated, show it in the Unfiltered. If you didn't fill in the survey before, do it this time. If you did and gave good ratings because you were afraid, show your frustration by being honest in the reviews. The Unfiltered results will be picked up by news outlets and they are sure to run stories on how much confidence the employees have in management. It has been steadily declining but the tipping point will be if it goes below 50%. I am sure that will be a big story. And I am also sure they will change the survey questions or frequency after that.

Meetings can be scheduled starting on 23rd @8am EST

I found out one of my peers who is a senior manager has a criminal background. Not sure if I should report her. I am pretty sure the company is not aware of it.

I work in resources and all i will say is from experience so far Delaware both TX and NM are pretty bad management wise

At AT&T, that apparently means trimming ambition, stretching timelines, and praying no one notices the difference between discipline and drift.

My team of registered field nurses has no work. Okay, we have some work but not very much, as in not enough to meet productivity. They hired new nurses last year just as things were slowing down. Now things are so bad- like the hunger games vying for appointments. Forget the bonus, it no longer exists. They are hiring yet again but we have no work! What the heck? What’s going on? My manager has no answer for lack of work, it’s almost like she is pretending the issue doesn’t exist. Any thoughts on what the strategy is here?

Layoffs incoming !!!! Time for managers to count their favorites and retain the ego strokers.

Hearing from several different LOB friends that the RTO reporting is no longer being monitored. Any managers have intel on this?

it's been a few months now. what is our grading of their performance?

i'll go first:
churn is the worst it has ever been (D-)
we haven't done anything to address our network strategy (D)
we moved data under a guy who knows nothing about data but is a friend (F)
we hired a manager to be svp of analytics, but at least they are friends with CTPO (C-)
we have no call center ops strategy (D-)
we've outsourced everything to hit an ebitda number, but now have no sustainability of ebitda (F)

overall grade... F

Manager here — trying to sanity check something.

I haven’t been given any formal tools, dashboards, or defined thresholds for tracking RTO attendance on my team, but I’m hearing a lot of specifics (e.g., ~50% thresholds, rolling 2–3 month averages, automated notifications).

Are other managers actually seeing concrete metrics behind the scenes, or are these assumptions based on when HR flags something?

Trying to understand what’s real vs inferred.

Has anyone considered that all of these post might be from upper level management to try to constantly scare us into doing more work than is required of us?

So now we have a "Panel Manager" role who gets paid 120k per year to literally take a number from a performance report and put it into an email because directors and field managers arent competent enough to monitor their teams performance on their own. 750k per year spent on a team of secrataries to spoon feed directors data from the same reports they have access to. No wonder we have to layoff other roles.

There are things that clearly aren’t working, but no one says it directly. Instead, we just keep adjusting around them. It feels like everyone sees it, but no one wants to be the one to call it out. So it just continues. Because that's so much better and productive than actually fixing the issue, right?

You ask three people the same question and get three different answers. All of them sound confident too. So it turns into a game of eeny, meeny, miny, moe to decide what to do. And if you get the wrong one, guess whose fault it is? This whole place has turned into one big joke.