#leadership

How many Dell PMs does it take to implement a feature?

Ten minimum

• One PM to ask engineering what features they’re working on given the PM roadmap is just whatever engineering accidentally mentions in Slack.

• One PM to get permission from engineering to talk about the feature followed by a mandatory disclaimer from engineering stating no commitments or guarantees the feature will actually be delivered.

• One PM to break the feature into 13 micro‑features so engineering can ship 1.5 micro stories per quarter and claim iterative customer value even though it doesn't work yet.

• One PM to update the roadmap no one sees, trusts, or uses because it changes so often it’s basically a weather forecast.

• One PM to create a 67‑page PowerPoint deck his manager will present as if he personally invented the feature, the product, and possibly storage itself.

• One PM to plan the release date four years from now, which will later be delayed because engineering discovered “unexpected feature creep."

• One PM to schedule a customer advisory call to validate the feature, then ignore all feedback because engineering thinks the customer is wrong.

• One PM to rename the feature three times so marketing can claim it’s AI‑enhanced.

• One PM to write the requirement and five more PMs to argue whether the requirement should exist at all or be replaced with a vision statement.

• One PM to present the feature in an exec review where leadership will ask why it isn’t already shipping, why it isn’t generating $400M ARR, and why it doesn’t run on ARM.

What are his contributions over the years?

He needs to go.
If you're running with 50M plus quotas, being micromanaged is just stupid.

so Chris D is gone... what did he deliver?? see you later...

What a day for Dell! they subjected the entire sb in round rock to a pie eating contest like the Mandingo fights from Django unchained. while they put the entire sales force on a draw. MD would've walked in like a plantation master and started throwing his coins at us like beggars

An Open Letter to Shane O'Kelly, the Executive Leadership Team, and the Board of Directors of Advance Auto Parts

From one of the thousands of leaders in the field.

Today, another respected leader is gone in RVA.

Whether you agree with the decision or not, field leaders across the company are asking the same question:

Have we reached the point where a Vice President's, DMs', GM's, TM's career can be defined by Project Pack sales?

If that perception is true, then we have lost sight of what is actually wrong with this company.

I honestly don't know what's more disappointing.

The previous leadership team that many employees believed focused on corporate initiatives while the business continued to deteriorate...

Or the current leadership team that appears to believe Advance Auto Parts can fight its way back by demanding more Project Packs, more attachments, more scorecards, and more pressure.

This isn't a turnaround strategy.

It's a distraction.

Selling more Project Packs will not fix years of declining market share, inconsistent inventory, operational challenges, technology issues, staffing shortages, customer frustration, or decades of strategic mistakes made far above the store level.

Those problems weren't created by Store Managers.

They weren't created by General Managers.

They weren't created by District Managers.

They weren't created by Vice Presidents.

Yet somehow, the people closest to the customer continue to carry the burden.

Every quarter there's another initiative.

Another metric.

Another conference call.

Another dashboard.

Another leader gone.

Meanwhile, the fundamental questions remain unanswered.

Why do we continue to lose experienced leaders?

Why do we continue to replace homegrown talent with outsiders who don't understand our culture?

Why does it feel like accountability flows only downward?

And where is the Board of Directors in all of this?

At what point does the Board stop measuring PowerPoint presentations and start asking why so many dedicated field leaders have lost confidence in the direction of this company?

The people in the stores are not asking for miracles.

We're asking for leadership.

Real leadership.

Leadership that listens before it mandates.

Leadership that fixes broken systems instead of creating new scorecards.

Leadership that values people more than weekly KPI reports.

Most of us have dedicated years—some, decades—of our lives to Advance Auto Parts.

We have missed birthdays.

Worked hurricanes.

Opened stores before sunrise.

Closed them after dark.

Worked weekends.

Covered vacancies.

Helped struggling stores.

Trained future leaders.

We stayed because we believed in this company.

We still do.

But belief alone cannot carry a company forward.

If today's events have taught us anything, it's this:

Fear does not inspire performance.

Pressure does not create loyalty.

And no company has ever KPI'd its way back to greatness.

Advance Auto Parts deserves better.

Its customers deserve better.

Its shareholders deserve better.

And most importantly...

Its people deserve better.

A Concerned Advance Auto Parts Leader

Other SBGs hear that BA is the promised land. How are things there, really? What is the leadership like and what is it like to work there?

T-Mobile is making leadership changes, including the departure of Mike Katz and the
rebuilding of the Un carrier spirit. The company is seeing progress in enterprise and
small-sized businesses, but the success of T-Mobile for Business is unclear. The
speakers discuss the potential for growth in the mobile business and the importance
of maintaining a fixed cost versus variable cost decision.The potential for disruptive companies to move into themobile space, with T-Mobile and Charter expected to see strong growth. TheSo we got some leadership changes taking place across the industry. Most recently, T Mobile where Mike Katz is stepping away after two decades. Coming on board at T Mobile as their new chief enterprise officer is Chris Sambar, who will be leadingthe SMB enterprises and government businesses. What we are observing here at T Mobile is with Srini Gopalan, a rebuilding, and we talked about thiswhen Srini came on board, a rebuilding of the Un carrier into a company that is even more focused
now on execution than it was ever before.With Greenie now being deeper in the saddle, and we saw like half a dozen of senior execs already leaving, the senior leadership team is like three quarters new.We see that Sriniis putting his team in place. You know, Andre Almeida, who came from Europe, oneof his close lieutenants of Srini's lieutenants, he ran the expanded enterprise group that not only hasbusiness init, but also like key ads and the Al efforts. He is now moving over as the president of marketing.It will be very interesting of how Andre will do that.They hired Chris Sambar, who, up until about two years ago, was at AT&T, a highly respected executive, a terrific leader, straight sho-ter, great executor, one of the architects and implementers of AT&T's FirstNet success story. For the last two years, he was like the COO of a storage company, and
now he's coming back to telecom. With Chris, T Mobile is getting a terrific executive. When we look at T Mobile for Business, they're making progress. They're growing. For somebody like Chris to come in, there's only upside,you know? In comparison, it's a huge number as a multiple. In absolute numbers, we always knew it was like.modest, but you have to start somewhere. And so, Andre is handing over that portfolio, and | think Chris will execute very well here. Yes. It will. Yeah. Well, let's see exactly where Chris takes this. On his farewell LinkedIn post or his goodbye to T Mobile LinkedIn post, Katz mentioned that he startedas ajunior in college as anin store sales rep. And with him, T Mobile and you have to give TMobile a lot of credit for rewriting telecom and, as they like to say, changing wireless for the better.He has a big role in this. He was also instrumental in forging the MVNO between the cable companiesand T Mobile for the business side. He never got enough credit for this. He was kind of the unsunghero here. | watched this over like five years happening, and how this slowly progressed forward.And without him, T Mobile would not have closed that MVNO agreement. You know, the cable companies just recently, and | don't think there was a big announcement about it,
they fully launched on T Mobile. | would say that the cable guys the cable guys are coming for small and mid.Now that
they have an offer where they can address up to a thousand lines, | would expect that the cable companies will get a lot, lot stronger in business on the mobile side.So, it will be an increasingly crowded space where three very disruptive companies, T Mobile witha new leader, Charter and Comcast, especially a Charter that will have absorbed Cox soon, play the.business market You know, we mentioned it before, T Mobile made about six monthsago the opposite decision of adding more company owned stores. For me, more company owned stores means you're more bullish that you have pretty consistent traffic where you put them.Whereas the variable decision, you don't know if it goes up or down, and you only want tocompensate for performance is when you move towards mobile.And from the T Mobile front, a branding perspective, you own the overall experience. So youyou are making sure that your employees are giving those customers exactly what they want.Obviously, you need the foot traffic to make that happen first and foremost. But, yeah, it's an.interesting divergence.At AT&T, about a month ago, Pascal Desroches announced he'll be retiring from a CFO position at the end of the year, and he will be replaced by Jennifer Beery. She's an AT&T alum,most recently CFO and COO at McAfee. Thoughts on Pascal stepping down?
Well, Pascal was the right man at the right time. He came in with John Stankey taking over as CEO,and he established a different tone than John Stevens had. Pascal really established faith and trust
and transparency back into the AT&T numbers. Under John Stevens, they changed how they reportedthe number almost every quarter. And it was so difficult to reconcile of what's actually going on in the
company and what the numbers said.
And as a result, none of the analysts trusted really AT&T's numbers. And a result, the stock traded ata discount of where it should trade. Pascal, who is a great person, really simplified how the company
was reporting, made it a lot more transparent, which also helped the company then to fully
demonstrate the success it has made over time, and how the company has focused on thefundamentals that has made AT&T an American icon. John Stankey refocused the company's strategyonconvergence. And Pascal told the story very successfully to Wall Street and investors.We did some work around investor relations. And one of the things that's also very interesting is
about half of AT&T's shareholders are retail shareholders. And what came out of that work that we did is that PASCAL restored the trust of small investors in the company. Investor Relations typically only deal with the massive investors, which is only half of the universe. And so, you know, Jennifer is coming in.She worked for John Stankey also before. When you go back when Jennifer worked for John the first
time around, John was very effusive about the qualifications of Jennifer. And I'm sure it hurt him when she stepped away. And what you need inthe relationship between the CEO and the CFO is a trusting relationship, you know, next to the COO. It's the most critical relationship you have.| always like to say the CEO is the brain of the company. The COO is the heart in Jeff McAlfresh. Hemoves the blood through the organization. The CFO is the lungs. They supply the oxygen that the
heart needs to push the blood through and to supply also the brain with oxygen.John gets back somebody he knows, he trusts, and based on what he said inthe past, admires and really gets along with.

OK, so I have sympathy for everyone who's impacted, and nobody deserves this. They don't need to get rid of all the directors and VPs because some of them actually know what they're doing. But seriously, and objectively, they should get rid of the ones who have no understanding of the ins and outs of the team. Their biggest contributions are taking credit for their managers' and ICs' work, creating unnecessary bureaucracy, and dragging everyone into endless, pointless meetings. The team/org would honestly run much better without them.

Is anyone on this meeting with Marissa??? What is happening….. why are they allowing people to change their minds. What a poorly lead organization. This is PHCO. We can also request a negotiation of our separation date…………

There is a unique kind of professional dread that comes with sitting in a mandatory weekly roundtable for a company with no remaining backlog. Being asked what are you working on when the answer is effectively nothing, because we are sitting ducks turns corporate communication into pure performance art. It highlights a painful gap in leadership when routine replaces reality, forcing employees to invent micro-tasks just to fill the silence.

Large number of them can be replaced with AI far easier than your lower level SMEs.

CTX is the worst. I don’t know anyone, other than a handful of a$$ kissers that don’t do any real work, that are happy. One of you leaders with some b@lls needs to step up and make some positive changes before all of the good people are gone or too burnt out to care.

HuffPost employees held a tense town hall meeting following recent layoffs. Staffers sought clarity on the job reductions and leadership's future plans. The meeting addressed concerns about the company's direction. Many questions were submitted anonymously by employees. The newsroom is still processing the impact of the cuts.

New York, New York

https://www.status.news/p/buzzfeed-huffpost-layoffs-byron-allen

I am curious about was the LR and pressure is in this sub org on sbg

Remove all parasite "leadership team" elements.

What value do they add to the operation of the company?

All some of these people do is go to meetings, spam worthless information on "YAMMER", and re-post the rubbish that their friends have published on LinkedIn .

Some of these people are job stage 8 and 9 . . . . How are these positions justified?

Come on man, can you at least pretend to do some work?

The finance folks under Ed Claure are WFM. Why do I have to move when the dead weight ADs with a handful of reports get to WFH? Dead weight dialer managers and collection strategy clowns sitting pretty at home.

As a consult with a third party company, should I be upset that I don’t count as a person on the team? Cuz technically I guess I ain’t This place only fills the needs of humans with temporary support. Leadership says they care but do they? Just a number right?

Thanks for a great quarter

“Carry on, work hard, and keep our numbers strong!” I guess that’s really all we can do right now but how do they expect us to focus? We have various team members with different separation dates. Leadership has said they’re sharing information as they receive it, but honestly, there hasn’t been much to share...

We still haven’t heard whether the rumored layoffs are moving forward or which departments or roles might be affected first. Like many other teams, our department depends heavily on work coming from the clinical teams, and it’s hard to know how many of those employees accepted the VSP. Until we have more clarity, I guess we just plug along?

Mike Garrison is leaving BD “retiring”, the projects are not doing well.. what’s happening to that business? No leaders can stay

Who remembers that?! From January 2025, back when the stock was over $200.

https://investors.fiserv.com/news-releases/news-release-details/tabitha-brown-becomes-first-chief-empowerment-officer-clover

Shannon Watkins, what was she thinking? And what was Frank B thinking when he hired Watkins?! (Probably, "I can't wait to get out of here and sell everything.")

How many of you wanted to punch your screen hearing these tone deaf "leaders" talk about the direction of the company and VSP.

Just awful!

I just saw, Nike 1st quarter 2027 and I will declare that it was extremely underwhelming to say the least. There was some sign of life in running but everywhere else, it was just not easy to be enthused.

So anyone hoping to Nike turnaround, I am afraid that for at least for more than 6 months, they will not show up.

And if things will continue as is then I am afraid that some point they will be LAYOFFS.

With our leader EH proving that he is not adept for the job of turnaround, I am pretty pessimistic.

I am 47 year Nike independent dealer and I have seen all. Great time and bad times (like when Reebok came and kicked Nike's a-s) but this time, I have a distinct feeling that Nike is sinking and going to dark end.

And be a RAT!!! Jump the ship before it start sinking LOL

Is this real? In what universe does Medtronic think that coremap will take share from carto. the ceo of that company is a walking scam artist. this company is truly made up of some id--ts

Rolling DNS before doing a deployment. Never, in my most "how bad could this get?" imagination did I expect to hear a senior technology leader bragging about achieving a process that has existed for decades. What a way to justify that big salary.

Wells Fargo: modernizing technology by bringing you the past.

People keep getting promoted and more leaders are added yet we can't consistently deliver products. Who is in charge of supply chain? How about we invest in some leadership there? How many reps have lined up evaluations or Go Live dates only to find out product X is on back-order? Marketing (who I'm sure would rather be doing actual marketing) sends out a laundry list of all the skus that aren't available with zero transparency as to why, vague/moving target recovery dates and substitute lists that are also on backorder. Gain/keep business is a challenge when 1/3 of my time is spent trying to find subs for procurement.

Is anyone else dealing with tone deaf leadership? Everyone has an opinion, but trying to gaslight people into thinking this is good for all is absolute bullsh-t. Taking the VSP isn't best for everyone. Even those of us dealing with burn out who feel ready to move on can’t just jump ship if our financial footing is unstable. Some of these so called leaders need to stop telling us how to feel about our livelihoods. I guess it's easy for someone pulling in mid to high six figures to believe that taking the VSP is an easy win.

Large financial institutions should consolidate functional teams into regional hub locations rather than dispersing small groups of employees across multiple states. Fragmented team structures—particularly where only a few employees are located in a state without local leadership or broader team presence—tend to reduce operational efficiency, weaken collaboration, and increase administrative complexity. Consolidation into hubs improves leadership effectiveness, strengthens compliance consistency, reduces cost, and enhances employee engagement and development.

Business Case for Consolidating Teams Within Major Financial Institutions

Large financial institutions operate most effectively when functional teams are geographically concentrated rather than dispersed across numerous states. While remote work has proven successful in many circumstances, scattering small groups of employees across multiple states—particularly when only a few team members are located in a state without local leadership or colleagues—can create unnecessary operational challenges.

Concentrating teams in regional hubs offers several advantages:

Stronger leadership and accountability. Employees benefit from direct access to managers and team leaders who understand the team’s daily operations. Local leadership can provide coaching, address issues promptly, and foster stronger engagement.
Improved collaboration. Teams that are located together, whether in person or within the same regional office, build stronger working relationships, communicate more effectively, and resolve issues faster than teams that are fragmented across many locations.
More consistent training and knowledge sharing. Financial institutions operate in highly regulated environments where consistency is critical. Centralized teams make it easier to deliver standardized training, mentor new employees, and ensure policies are applied uniformly.
Greater operational efficiency. Supporting very small groups in multiple states can increase administrative complexity, including office support, equipment logistics, travel, and state-specific employment compliance. Consolidating teams can reduce these costs and simplify operations.
Stronger organizational culture. Employees who work alongside teammates and leaders often feel more connected to the organization, resulting in higher engagement, better morale, and improved retention.
Enhanced career development. Employees working in larger team locations have more opportunities to collaborate with experienced colleagues, participate in cross-training, and pursue leadership opportunities.
When business needs require remote employees, organizations should consider maintaining a meaningful presence in each location rather than having only a handful of employees isolated from their team and leadership. As a general guideline, assigning fewer than four employees to a state where no other team members or leaders are present may not provide sufficient operational or organizational benefits to justify the added complexity.

For these reasons, financial institutions should periodically evaluate whether highly fragmented team structures continue to support their strategic objectives. Whenever practical, consolidating teams into established regional hubs can improve efficiency, strengthen leadership, reduce costs, and create a more consistent experience for both employees and customers.

She's swapping with TP, TP is going to fix GC and CS can focus on growing NA - GC was too hard for her.

Will they take the opportunity to finally clean out more of ISG's clown car leadership or will they keep playing nepotistic games?

One of the biggest surprises here has been how disconnected everything feels. There's very little collaboration, almost no coaching, and it's easy to go long stretches without hearing from leadership unless there's a problem. Is this just me? Did I get really unlucky?

Every week another solid performer walks out due to the uncertainty and constant cuts. Anybody who has options is heading for the door. The brain drain is real, and I don't think leadership even sees it. Or they see it and don't care, instead they're celebrating the attrition without severance.

I've been here long enough to see no strategy, no vision, just random decisions. Prove me wrong.

Has destroyed my will to work anymore. This place is a he-l hole that will not get better until CR is fired and his entire ELT. This latest round is the d-mbest sh-t they have exposed us to.

Received an email today about the changes in Isolation. The current president hasn’t even been there a year. What is going on?

Heads up: if you're on UMV, many of the senior leaders are leaving. This is one of the orgs that will get RIF'd and moved offshore with Cognizant contracting.

Leaders who took Voluntary Separation Package

Kristen SVP,
Nicole VP,
Jeremey VP

and many other managers and engineers.

Maybe they know something you don't? If you don't have a plan, start planning now.

https://analyticsindiamag.com/ai-news/cognizant-lands-centene-mega-deal-worth-over-500-mn-report