#ailayoffs

It's going to be a bloodbath.

Recently, senior executives at Salesforce have admitted, both internally and publicly, that they massively overestimated AI’s capabilities. They have found that AI simply can’t cope with the complex nature of customer service and totally fails at nuanced issues, escalations, and long-tail customer problems. They even say that it has caused a marked decline in service quality and far more complaints.

But the problems go far deeper than that.

Both employees and executives have said that the company is wasting countless resources on firefighting to stabilise operations since the mass AI layoff. Employees have to spend so much time stepping in to correct the wildly wrong AI-generated responses that AI is wasting more time than it saves. In other words, this AI reduces productivity, not increases it.

But there is also a huge problem here with expertise and skill debt. On top of the firefighting to correct the AI, executives have also highlighted how they are also having to firefight to stabilise their systems from problems that were previously easily solved by staff who had the required experience and skill. However, these staff were fired in the AI layoffs.

https://www.planetearthandbeyond.co/p/reality-is-breaking-the-ai-revolution

Citigroup announced over one thousand job cuts. Meta also cut 1,500 jobs in its virtual reality division. However, little evidence suggests AI is displacing workers en masse. A recent analysis found the proportion of AI-disruptible jobs remained steady. Macroeconomic uncertainty and immigration policy changes also influence the labor market.

https://www.fastcompany.com/91474511/ai-related-layoffs-keep-coming-but-theres-more-to-the-story

https://www.axios.com/2026/01/14/ai-jobs-productivity-workslop

"The big picture: CEOs and employers are super eager to reap the productivity benefits of AI — particularly so they can bring down labor costs.

But for now, AI is mainly being used as an excuse to conduct layoffs that are due to other factors, says Rob Hornby, co-CEO of consultancy AlixPartners.
In a survey from his firm, also out Wednesday, 95% of CEOs said they expected to conduct layoffs in the next five years because of AI. That's likely more hope than reality. CEOs aren't yet seeing productivity gains from AI, he says."

Sounds like LHX. He's probably referring to LHX Next!!

In the last year, AI-related layoffs have started to feel routine, showing up nearly every week in corporate announcements. Businesses in multiple sectors are increasingly citing “efficiency improvements” from artificial intelligence as the reason for workforce reductions. While companies frame these moves as innovation-driven, many workers see AI being used as a cover for cost-cutting and restructuring.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/opinion-a-shorter-workweek-can-prevent-ai-driven-mass-unemployment/ar-AA1U0ce2

I’ll sum the email up for you quickly:

“You American employees are too expensive and we need to make the stock price go up, we’re going to be spending the next 24 months laying off as many of you as possible to be replaced with AI and/or cheap India labor”

I appreciate the heads up, but a 2 year timeline is crazy.

Just got confirmation on February layoffs at the end of the month.
The numbers are staggering...
30% of collab being let go and replaced with AI.
Its time to become a plumber

Eric Vaughan, CEO of enterprise-software powerhouse IgniteTech, was unwavering as he reflected on the most radical decision of his decades-long career. In early 2023, convinced generative AI was an “existential” transformation, Vaughan looked at his team and saw a workforce not fully on board. His ultimate response: He ripped the company down to the studs, replacing nearly 80% of staff within a year, according to headcount figures reviewed by Fortune.

https://fortune.com/article/ceo-laid-off-80-percent-workforce-sabotage-what-are-ai-skills/

Goldman Sachs begins laying off staff on Jan. 11 in a broad restructuring that targets investment banking and global markets roles and aims to cut $1.3 billion in operating expenses over three years. The moves reflect a strategic push to redeploy capital into priority businesses and technology, but the scale and timing remain unclear and could reshape hiring, compensation and offshore staffing across the industry.

https://www.prismedia.ai/news/goldman-sachs-begins-major-layoffs-in-aifueled-cost-push

Goldman Sachs is set to begin layoffs on January 11 as part of a wider shake-up centered on its investment banking and global markets teams. The cuts are aimed at saving $1.3 billion in operating costs over the next three years, as the bank shifts capital toward its top businesses and technology.

https://www.prismedia.ai/news/goldman-sachs-begins-major-layoffs-in-aifueled-cost-push

• Angi, the company formerly known as Angie's List, is cutting 350 jobs, it said on Wednesday.
• Angi cited AI efficiency among its reasons for the layoffs.
• Economists and tech experts have predicted that more companies will replace humans with AI in 2026.

https://www.businessinsider.com/angi-layoffs-angies-list-cuts-350-jobs-ai-efficiency-gains-2026-1

• Companies such as Angi and Tailwind have said they're trimming staff this year.
• Most recently, Angi cited AI as a factor in its decision to shed around 350 jobs.
• See the list of companies letting workers go in 2026.

https://www.businessinsider.com/recent-company-layoffs-laying-off-workers-2026

We knew it was coming but still a horrible feeling to be impacted. Thanks to outsourcing and AI everyone is at risk!

The news indicates a prevailing sentiment among employees regarding recent layoffs. A significant 69% of workers believe that "AI layoffs" are not genuine reasons for job cuts. Instead, many employees suspect that artificial intelligence is merely being used as an excuse for broader restructuring or cost-cutting measures. No specific company is named as having conducted these particular layoffs.

https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2026/01/08/69-of-employees-think-ai-layoffs-are-just-an-excuse/176037/

This is published information- these layoffs have been planned for several years. All of the “ we are a people first company “ we care about your career, growth, development” spiel is garbage.

C-Levels and their directs are all full of BS. Stop drinking the kool aid they are serving up, stop cheering for them as the spew this BS. They do not care about you! You are a commodity, “a human tax” that will eventually do away with while lining their pockets.

Details: do your own research

T-Mobile projects that AI initiatives will drive approximately $10 billion in additional Core Adjusted EBITDA by 2027.

At its September 2024 Capital Markets Day, T-Mobile outlined a growth strategy heavily leveraging artificial intelligence and expected financial targets for 2027.

Key points regarding T-Mobile and AI by 2027:
Financial Impact: AI and digital leadership are expected to increase Core Adjusted EBITDA to between $38 billion and $39 billion by 2027, an increase of roughly $10 billion from 2023 levels.

Customer Experience: T-Mobile is collaborating with OpenAI to create an AI-powered customer service platform, called IntentCX, aimed at providing faster and more personalized customer support experiences.
Network Performance: The company has partnered with Nvidia, Ericsson, and Nokia to establish an AI-RAN Innovation Center in Bellevue, Washington, which will use AI to optimize the radio access network for faster speeds and reduced latency.

Revenue & Efficiency: AI is seen as a key driver of significant operating efficiencies and a projected service revenue compound annual growth rate of about 5% through 2027, reaching up to $76 billion.

While AI is central to T-Mobile's growth strategy and financial outlook for 2027, it remains one component of a broader plan that includes network leadership, customer growth, and strategic acquisitions.

The news indicates a prevailing sentiment among employees regarding recent layoffs. A significant 69% of workers believe that "AI layoffs" are not genuine reasons for job cuts. Instead, many employees suspect that artificial intelligence is merely being used as an excuse for broader restructuring or cost-cutting measures. No specific company is named as having conducted these particular layoffs.

https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2026/01/08/69-of-employees-think-ai-layoffs-are-just-an-excuse/176037/

Amazon is eliminating 2,400 jobs in Washington state, a decision tied to a ten-year $100 billion investment into artificial intelligence technologies. This workforce reduction is scheduled to take effect in early 2026 as the company restructures its internal operations to support AI development through Amazon Web Services.

The affected roles span a variety of corporate departments in the Seattle region, where Amazon has maintained a significant presence for decades.

The company has announced that funding redirected from these job eliminations will support enhancements to AI infrastructure, including data centers, machine learning models, and AI-powered products.

While some employees will be eligible for severance and job placement assistance, the announcement has caused concern among workers and the surrounding community. Many are focusing on the local economic effects of removing thousands of salaried jobs in a region closely tied to the company’s history.

Why It Matters: The removal of thousands of roles from Amazon’s Washington workforce introduces new concerns about how artificial intelligence is reshaping employment patterns within the technology sector. Decisions to move funding from salaried staff to machine learning systems are becoming more common and could influence long-term approaches to infrastructure and business growth.

Somehow, after being RIF’d, I’ve come to believe that if AI truly represents the future, it may actually bring more fairness and consistency to decision-making. Unlike human systems that can be influenced by favoritism or bias, AI has the potential to evaluate people based on clear criteria, data, and merit rather than personal agendas.

According to a report by CNBC citing consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, AI was responsible for nearly 55,000 layoffs in the U.S. in 2025. This comes during a year that had the highest number of layoffs since the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, with 1.17 million job cuts across the country, the consulting firm also reported.

https://mashable.com/article/ai-linked-50000-job-cuts-2025

Salesforce, one of the world’s most influential enterprise software companies, is quietly but significantly rethinking its aggressive push toward artificial intelligence. After laying off nearly 4,000 employees and replacing many support roles with AI-powered agents, senior executives at the company have admitted that their confidence in large language models (LLMs) has declined. This shift marks a notable moment in the broader tech industry’s relationship with generative AI, exposing the gap between promise and practical performance.

https://hostalup.substack.com/p/salesforce-reconsiders-its-ai-first

While CEOs have spent months framing layoffs as a strategic shift toward AI-driven efficiency, the equity market has perceived recent layoff announcements as a negative signal about company’ prospects. "AI restructuring" is often a convenient cover for desperate cost-cutting necessitated by declining profitability.

2025 in review: Headcount on the slide
Thousands more jobs disappeared from telco and vendor workforces in 2025 as company bosses blamed AI for cuts.
https://www.lightreading.com/ai-machine-learning/2025-in-review-headcount-on-the-slide

Dan foolishly believes A.I. will magically fix everything wrong with Verizon.

The only question is how much damage will he do before he leaves?

Beware....Certain field techs were now volunteered to test an AI program that we are being told to eliminate some inside jobs such as NTs(Network Techs)

Hello. I am a journalist with the FT who writes about Optum and UnitedHealth. I have heard that there was a layoff at Optum Insight sometime before Thanksgiving. Would love to chat with anyone affected for a story I am writing. Get in touch, Mansur.Shaheen@FT.com

Does anyone know of any RIFed roles actually replaced with AI?

Last quarter, I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees at $30 per seat per month—about $1.4 million a year. I packaged the whole thing as “digital transformation,” a phrase the board loved so much they approved it in eleven minutes. No one asked what Copilot would actually do, including me. I promised it would “10x productivity,” which isn’t a real metric, but it sounds like one. When HR asked how we’d measure that, I told them we’d “leverage analytics dashboards,” and they promptly stopped asking. Three months later, I checked the usage reports: 47 people had opened it, 12 had used it more than once, and one of them was me. I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds; it took 45 seconds and still required correcting hallucinations. Still, I declared the pilot a success—success meaning it didn’t visibly fail. When the CFO asked about ROI, I showed him a graph that moved up and to the right, charting a metric I invented called “AI enablement.” He nodded approvingly. We are now officially “AI-enabled,” whatever that means, and it’s proudly featured in our investor deck.
A senior developer asked why we didn’t just use Claude or ChatGPT, and I replied that we needed “enterprise-grade security.” When he asked what that meant, I said “compliance.” When he asked which compliance, I said “all of them.” His skepticism earned him a “career development conversation,” after which he stopped asking questions. Meanwhile, Microsoft sent a case study team who happily accepted my claim that we “saved 40,000 hours,” a number I produced by multiplying employees by a figure I made up. They didn’t verify it, and they never do. Now we’re featured on Microsoft’s website as a global enterprise achieving massive productivity gains, and the CEO shared it on LinkedIn to 3,000 likes—despite never having used Copilot. None of the executives have; we granted ourselves an exemption to avoid “digital distraction,” a policy I wrote. With licenses renewing next month, I’m requesting an expansion: 5,000 more seats. We haven’t used the first 4,000, but this time we’ll “drive adoption,” which means mandatory training—a 45-minute webinar no one watches but everyone completes, and completion is a metric. Metrics go in dashboards, dashboards go in board presentations, and board presentations get me promoted. I’ll be SVP by Q3. I still don’t know what Copilot actually does, but I know what it’s for: proving we’re “investing in AI.” Investment means spending, spending means commitment, and commitment means we’re serious about the future—the future being whatever I say it is, as long as the graph goes up and to the right.

Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.

$30 per seat per month.

$1.4 million annually.

I called it "digital transformation."

The board loved that phrase.

They approved it in eleven minutes.

No one asked what it would actually do.

Including me.

I told everyone it would "10x productivity."

That's not a real number.

But it sounds like one.

HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.

I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."

They stopped asking.

Three months later I checked the usage reports.

47 people had opened it.

12 had used it more than once.

One of them was me.

I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.

It took 45 seconds.

Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.

But I called it a "pilot success."

Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.

The CFO asked about ROI.

I showed him a graph.

The graph went up and to the right.

It measured "AI enablement."

I made that metric up.

He nodded approvingly.

We're "AI-enabled" now.

I don't know what that means.

But it's in our investor deck.

A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.

I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."

He asked what that meant.

I said "compliance."

He asked which compliance.

I said "all of them."

He looked skeptical.

I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."

He stopped asking questions.

Microsoft sent a case study team.

They wanted to feature us as a success story.

I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."

I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.

They didn't verify it.

They never do.

Now we're on Microsoft's website.

"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."

The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.

He got 3,000 likes.

He's never used Copilot.

None of the executives have.

We have an exemption.

"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."

I wrote that policy.

The licenses renew next month.

I'm requesting an expansion.

5,000 more seats.

We haven't used the first 4,000.

But this time we'll "drive adoption."

Adoption means mandatory training.

Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.

But completion will be tracked.

Completion is a metric.

Metrics go in dashboards.

Dashboards go in board presentations.

Board presentations get me promoted.

I'll be SVP by Q3.

I still don't know what Copilot does.

But I know what it's for.

It's for showing we're "investing in AI."

Investment means spending.

Spending means commitment.

Commitment means we're serious about the future.

The future is whatever I say it is.

As long as the graph goes up and to the right.

All this talk about how AI is going to take this company so far ahead has it really helped you at all? Or just helped you out the door?

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/batteryvault_general-motors-indefinitely-freezes-26b-activity-7398724869489737729-xDgR

General Motors has indefinitely frozen its $2.6 billion Tennessee megafactory project and announced its largest layoff wave, cutting 3,420 jobs across its EV and battery manufacturing operations in late 2025. The majority of affected workers are from its Detroit Factory Zero EV plant and the Ultium Cells LLC battery plant in Ohio and Tennessee.

From Reuters

Wells Fargo: severance likely to rise in fourth quarter
Bank will roll out AI gradually over the next year and beyond
More efficiencies to come from AI, CEO says
Dec 9 (Reuters) - Wells Fargo (WFC.N), opens new tab expects more cuts to its workforce and sees higher severance expenses in the current fourth quarter, CEO Charlie Scharf said on Tuesday, adding that artificial intelligence was set to change the way its business works.
"We have gone through the budgeting process, and even pre-artificial intelligence, we do expect to have less people as we go into next year," Scharf said on the sidelines of a Goldman Sachs financial services conference.

I’d love to know how much money is being burned on that hallucinating mess, and how many people were pushed out specifically “because of AI.” Sure, most cuts were really about offshoring, but some people absolutely were replaced in the name of AI, and the productivity expectations tied to it keep creeping up. It’s about time people noticed that, in most cases, AI just drains time and energy. Replace people? Good luck relying on a machine that can’t give you the same answer twice.

AI now affects one in four jobs worldwide and could trigger the largest workforce displacement in modern history. An estimated 30–50% of office jobs may be replaced or heavily reshaped within five years. Are we prepared? Are our leaders prepared? Do we have a plan to retrain workers for the new labor market?

https://www.sanluisobispo.com/opinion/readers-opinion/article313429763.html

Meta has acquired AI-wearables startup Limitless, maker of a pendant-style device that records and transcribes real-world conversations, as the social media giant doubles down on efforts to build AI-enabled consumer hardware.

https://www.reuters.com/business/meta-acquires-ai-wearables-startup-limitless-2025-12-05/

1k days?

Dan wants Ai displace Verizon employees within 1000 days per his comments on his all hands call. Time to jump off the sinking ship before then.

Artificial Intelligence is being promoted as the next great engine of prosperity. AT&T, like many others, insists that AI will be a job creator, a force that opens new opportunities and drives innovation. But let’s be honest. If AI is as successful as its architects hope, it will never generate more jobs than it destroys.

The entire purpose of AI investment is efficiency. It is designed to automate, to optimize, to eliminate human error, and ultimately to eliminate human labor. If after billions in research and infrastructure AI does not eliminate millions of jobs, it will be judged a failure. That is the paradox. Success for AI means displacement on a scale society has never seen.

This is not alarmism. It is simple math. Every breakthrough in automation has reduced the need for human workers. AI is not just another tool. It is a general-purpose technology capable of replacing cognitive, creative, and managerial tasks once thought untouchable. When machines can write, analyze, negotiate, and even empathize, what remains for us?

The consequences go far beyond unemployment statistics. Work is not just a paycheck. It is the backbone of civil society. It structures our days, gives us purpose, and ties us to communities. Strip away meaningful employment for millions, and you do not just create economic instability. You unravel the social fabric itself.

If AI succeeds, we face a collapse of civil society:

• Mass displacement of workers across industries, not only manufacturing but also white-collar and professional roles
• Erosion of identity and purpose as people lose the roles that anchor them in society
• Concentration of wealth and power as the benefits of AI accrue to a handful of corporations and investors
• Political instability as inequality deepens and trust in institutions evaporates

We cannot afford to be lulled by glossy promises of “new jobs” or “reskilling.” History shows that the jobs created by automation are fewer, more specialized, and often inaccessible to those displaced. The scale of AI disruption will dwarf past industrial revolutions.

This is not a distant future. It is unfolding now. The urgency is real. If we do not confront the societal consequences head-on, we risk trading human dignity for technological progress. And that is not progress at all. It is collapse.

Quantum Corp. Sheds 1,500 Jobs Amid AI-Driven Restructuring

• TechCrunch
  Dec 3, 2025, 9:30 AM PT
• Quantum Corp., a leading innovator in AI, announced a significant reduction in its global workforce today, impacting approximately 1,500 employees. The company stated the layoffs are part of a strategic restructuring effort aimed at streamlining operations and shifting focus towards advanced AI development. This move follows a period of aggressive hiring but also increasing automation within its software and data departments. Affected employees will receive severance packages, outplacement services, and extended benefits. Analysts suggest this trend reflects a broader industry pattern where AI advancements are leading to efficiency gains at the cost of human jobs.
  https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/03/quantum-corp-layoffs-ai-restructuring/

When’s the next round for all those not embracing AI?

There's a weird effort to consolidate knowledge in tech. It absolutely feels like we're all being asked to make everything it takes to do our jobs be documented in a single repository. Whether that's to farm out the work, or train an AI on it is tough to discern, but it sure feels like we're being set up to be replaced by something. In multiple decades of working here, I've never seen a push like this.