#feedback

It's extremely telling that I have had three different emails from higher ups asking me to let them know once I have completed the Allstate Asks survey, and now McKeown has sent an ANI-wide email.

Zulfi and Kunal are not interested in honest feedback so why waste our time pretending otherwise? What do they get by people being over-positive in a survey that makes zero difference?

I’m at OMNISSA one and the feedback has been terrible. First hand feedback customers have said it’s not worth the trip. Nothing new, and the AI strategy is trash. A couple customers that have met Kevin norlin asked how he had a job. It’s embarrassing to be here representing this company.

If you are a new or old employee you should have received an email from
-Microsoft Viva Glint- for this anonymous survey. There are 30 questions total that have ratings on a 1-10 scale (1 meaning strongly disagree, 10 meaning strongly agree) you can add comments to each question rating as well. Keep in mind you can accidentally out yourself if you comment something that your manager knows it is a subject that you in particular talk about. While there are anti retaliation policies at GF that will not stop management from trying to figure out who wrote which comment.

Here is your one chance to make changes in your department. If you feel like your voices are ignored and feedback is brushed aside answer honestly and rate 1's. Managers with low ratings on this survey get put under an HR microscope, too many unhappy employees will cause action to be taken based on how many employees are unhappy.

If you don't have an issue with your department or manager then still make sure you voice that in the survey and give them a good rating. Good managers and leadership are hard to come by and employees do not get too many chances to have a say in their environment.

Your voice survey link was sent me for the yearly employee survey. I really have mixed feelings about giving real honest feedback. Leadership knows who doesn't fill out the survey and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out who has something negative about the company despite them saying it's confidential. Yes, they know what you say when you provide feedback that represents an outlier that could be hurtful to others and the company. This could be the first year in five years that I am not going to complete the survey. Why? Because at the end of the day, our opinions really don't matter.

I haven’t seen the results or heard anything from my leadership. It’s almost as if it never happened. Anyone else?

Not sure how they expect anyone to Ever participate again after these last two have been totally ignored… Insane.

Is there a way to give real feedback on leaders without it being tracked back to us like an anonymous email server to the firm somehow? Feel like we are going to be in a bad spot if we can’t speak freely about what we witness and life will never get better otherwise

The numbers for August have been released and if you thought July was bad, think again.

I guess when sales people are continuously lied to and the company makes it almost impossible for those people to make a honest living, you get these results.

It’s a nice touch that they are giving us an extra 1% incentive this month on our sales. I also find it funny that once again the marketing department wants to know if our competition used the tariffs as an excuse to raise prices.

The employees of this company are not happy with the leadership. This new regime has ruined Canon and no one has the ba--s to tell the man that he is continually making mistakes for fear of losing their job.

Send the company survey out in September. Regardless of whether it’s anonymous or not, does anyone really think we will ever see the true results. I think we all, including senior leadership, know exactly what they will see. We will see a company where the employees have lost pride in the company they are employed by. You will see a company where the majority of employees lack trust in leadership.

In the end, the numbers and the profits may look good on paper but we all know those numbers are fabricated and won’t last forever as long as the hard working employees remain unsettled with the current state.

Is it anonymous?

The culture’s assessment? Terminal.

Let’s hear some of those responses. I don’t think they’re ready to hear what people really think.

Apart from CEO.

Ignore Ipulse, let's tell them what we think here, no holding back.

Nike's apparel leadership is sleepwalking through a masterclass in mediocrity, churning out clothes that fit like a midlife crisis and feel like a betrayal of their own "Just Do It" mantra.

Earth to Beaverton: the market is screaming for fitted, functional, and actually wearable gear, but you're too busy peddling baggy, outdated designs that belong in a clearance bin at a discount store. Lululemon, Vuori, and Fabletics are eating your lunch because they get it consumers will pay for quality, fit, and style.

Meanwhile, Nike's stuck in a 90s time warp, dressing athletes like they're auditioning for a Kohl's sale rack.

Your 25.7 line was a half-hearted nod at progress, but it’s still a swing and a miss. Not everyone wants to drown in oversized fabric that screams "I gave up." Take a look at golf, poor Scottie Scheffler looks like he’s wearing a hand-me-down tent every weekend. Your "standard fit" polos are a joke, forcing players to tuck in yards of excess fabric just to avoid looking like they raided their dad’s closet. Golf shorts? Baggy, long, and about as flattering as a potato sack.

Running shorts are fine, congrats on getting one thing right but your golf joggers are an insult to anyone who values style or function. Sweats are not joggers, Nike. Get a grip.

Who’s modeling these designs? A team of couch potatoes who think "athleisure" means "loungewear for Netflix binges"? The market is begging for fitted cuts, premium materials, and sizing that doesn’t assume every customer is built like a linebacker.

Consumers are dropping serious cash on brands that respect their bodies and lifestyles. Lululemon’s stock is proof of that. Nike, you’re sitting on a goldmine of opportunity, but your apparel team is too busy sniffing their own fumes to notice. Step up, ditch the initio, or keep handing the apparel crown to brands that actually listen to the market.

When do you think we can do another CES so I can give my opinion on how cr-ppy things are?

If you are at Dell then you aren't great either but just good enough.