Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

Remote employees getting laid off?

Is this rumor true


by
| 16 views | | 15 replies (last 23 minutes ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m3dddx5m

15 replies (most recent on top)

@cq It's a slow trickle layoff regime, at least in my area. Our L4 has been tasked with identifying conversion prospects overseas and we're laying off FTEs slowly to migrate those jobs offshore. My suspicion (haven't been told by my management) is that only top performers and those with the potential to be will be left in a couple of years and everything else will be in Hyderabad. I do not know how they expect work to get done because our on shore teams of 8-14 FTEs per manager are overworked now and I didn't see any justification for cutting productive colleagues that we lost over the past four years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1m3dddx5m

@ag work from home and remote work existed before COVID you knob. There were people hired into a remote position before COVID that got forced back into the office. I WAS HIRED INTO A REMOTE ROLE NOT A HYBRID ONE.

For a company that pushes adaptability to change, you people seem to be totally opposed to embracing that change. The world changed. How we work changed. Why are you so bent on reverting back to how it was?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d0+1m3dddx5m

Not the OP but I came to this site to ask the same question. I know they said no mass remote layoffs but I’m curious if they will still continue to target remote employees first in expense reduction and role/org changes? Does anyone know if remote employees top the list for layoffs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1m3dddx5m

@aj

Any winning is going to happen in spite of my best efforts, not because of them. This is an oppositional relationship, don't you know?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cm+1m3dddx5m

@ag

You are right. Let's roll everything back to 1926. I mean every aspect of society, permanently frozen to 100 years ago.

As soon as you've finished that, we can talk RTO, bootlicker.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ck+1m3dddx5m

@ag These aren't the 1950's anymore. Technology now exists to make WFH more productive than the office. Why are employees being forced to spend all this money and travel time to work in the office where they spend hours on Team meetings? Make it make sense?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1m3dddx5m

@at what can you share?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1m3dddx5m

@aq know what? It’s not a rumor it’s a fact.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1m3dddx5m

@aj Didn't accept what they are doing. Maybe you did but they pulled the carpet from under us and changed the script. No one signed on to this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1m3dddx5m

Anyone know?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1m3dddx5m

@ag sure

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1m3dddx5m

@OP I’m becoming a whistleblower. Let’s go!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1m3dddx5m

@a1 Drive? Parking at city hubs is minimum $55+ a day and traffic is horrendous. That’s a huge pay cut 3+ times a week. They are forcing us to do the unimaginable. Taking public transport will take an hour and a half each day, bus, train and then walk and dangerous on top of that. I’m not getting jumped cause Gunjan said so. I wish her the absolute worst.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1m3dddx5m

What’s unfair is these hub locations are in the large cities only. Not convenient for everyone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1m3dddx5m

@OP if there not willing to drive to nearest hub or call center, yes. Some divisions leaning in harder than others

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1m3dddx5m

Post a reply

: