I keep hearing from many people that our executives plan to keep cutting until disaster strikes. Is this really the strategy? Another Valdez or Macondo is what it will take to convince executives they have gone too far?
8 replies (most recent on top)
Please please please record this for an investigation. I keep hearing the same words (we are going to continue to squeeze until something breaks) so when something does break and we have a major incident, the leadership go to jail. And don’t try to blame the field guys when something goes wrong.
It is like putting effort into imminent disaster.
Forbid tracking of BTC failures. Forbid tracking of Indian Engineering mistakes. Forbid tracking of intentional quality failures at Indian fabricators.
It is like EM drilling more holes in every safety barrier at once trying to create that straight shot through the Swiss cheese.
Make HC10 headcount cuts and move work to BTC as quickly as possible, without regard to capability, and publishing failure-rework data is forbidden.
Translation: “Put this blindfold on then run the obstacle course as faster”
EM chasing pennies(rupees) while risking billion$
@br the proliferation of “fail fast” will have disastrous results
Risk management.
It’s like with AI. Keep going until something breaks. Management has already collected enough cash to be fine if everything goes to he-l. They have nothing to lose.
As someone who recently left the company, you should too. It’s so much better on the outside.
Electric Vehicles (cars and trucks) is rapidly growing around the world (exception: the United States).
Our short term and long term goals is "what will we do if we have to sell less gasoline and diesel long term? and wind, solar, and nuclear becomes the norm?
The plan is to loot the company as much as possible for as long as possible, there is no other strategy than that.