Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel: $113M in Penalties Since 2000

According to Good Jobs First's Violation Tracker, Intel and companies currently under its ownership have accumulated approximately $113M in penalties across 9 cases since 2000.

Here's the breakdown:

Competition-related: $104M

  • 2015: $104M - Price-fixing or anti-competitive practices (private federal lawsuit)

Employment-related: $8.5M

  • 2018: $5M - Wage and hour violation (private state lawsuit)
  • 2019: $3.5M - Employment discrimination (U.S. Department of Labor, OFCCP)

Environmental: $213K

  • 2014: $143K - Oregon environmental violation
  • 2023: $31K - Oregon environmental violation
  • 2026: $39K - EPA environmental violation

Other violations: $155K

  • 2014: $144K - FCC telecommunications violation
  • 2017: $5K - OSHA workplace safety violation
  • 2013: $6K - FAA aviation safety violation

A few observations:

  • Roughly 92% of the total comes from a single competition-related case.
  • The $8.5M in employment-related penalties is arguably more relevant to Intel employees, particularly given ongoing discussions about compensation, layoffs, and management practices.
  • These cases span more than two decades and don't necessarily reflect current practices.
  • The database includes private lawsuit settlements as well as government enforcement actions, so not every amount represents a government fine.

What interests me most are the 2018 wage and hour case ($5M) and 2019 employment discrimination case ($3.5M). Did those settlements lead to any meaningful changes in how Intel treats its employees?

Source: Good Jobs First, Violation Tracker (2026)

https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/


by
| 38 views | | 6 replies (last 20 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m75s22ye

6 replies (most recent on top)

@bd I don’t believe you have evidence of any of the claims you have alleged.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1m75s22ye

Great. If someone sue the criminal Intel, I would like to give a lot of evidence.

For example,

  • Intel manager released top secrets to external companies, most likely the manager is bribed.
  • How Intel users non-related people view external customer's foundry data, this is a serious violation. This can disqualify Intel for foundry business.
  • How managers bully engineers constantly.
  • How managers tell lies.
  • How Automation group cheated Pat on "AI everywhere", by making a fake demo to the world.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1m75s22ye

@a4
Leather jacket will do no perp walk. He will collect a big bonus this year and years to come. Watch.
At the most congress will call him for a show hearing and ask him questions angrily.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1m75s22ye

113M over a period of 26 years is peanuts for a company like Intel. It’s like a rich dude doing a parking violation for convenience knowing the fine will be paltry.
If you think you live in a representative democracy you are deluded.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1m75s22ye

@OP $113M sound like a lot on its own but this is over nearly 26 years... over a quarter of a century. In the same time frame Intel has earned around $1.3 trillion in revenue. Your $113 M isn't going to be noticed and it certainly isn't going to cause the company to change its behavior.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1m75s22ye

Those are just the typical taxes for doing business in Silicon Valley.

At least Intel did not keep selling chips to China when told to stop, unlike a certain other company..

Get ready to see a leather jacket doing a perp walk.

It's coming..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1m75s22ye

Post a reply

: