What will say? Will it include a new RTO policy?
26 replies (most recent on top)
@ja read the handbook and the supporting information to what occurs with a rating of off track.
@hn in office avg of 3 days was mentioned for reviews only not for severance and the yearly bonus. It will count only for or against for outstanding rankings
@hs effective as long as you meet the in office threshold. That line item was on the chart for both outstanding and effective. It was the bottom line on both columns.
@cs It only said you couldn’t get outstanding. You can still get effective.
@hn no. I mean just the bonus. Regardless of laid off or not. Anyone marked as off track becomes ineligible for a merit increase and bonus. It was in the presentation from HR this past week. So if you haven’t averaged 3 days a week you can be marked off track. Your manager can file for an exception under certain requirements.
Hold the he-l on. We forfeit our severance for not adhering to this retroactive 3days?
@h7 not according to hr policy if marked off track which means you better have averaged 3 days a week in office all year
@gj if you stay through the end of the year you get the severance and your yearly bonus.
@ed you also won’t get your bonus
Unintended benefit of getting laid off: not having to worry about the next bullsh-t cost-of-living increase.
@cq yup so now we won't event get our 30 cent increase by design its now virtually impossible. Lol
Why didn't anyone know anything?
@d9 - a mgr shared that last yr hr tried to force him to rate his analyst off track due to her attendance. Said he refused to do it. Don't think that's gonna fly this year.
@d9 no clue. The Q&A section was filled with questions and none got answered.
@d7 there's a ton of people who don't meet that so they're all going to be rated off track?
@cs on the call they stated the policy is 4 days a week but they judge attendance based on 3 days a week to account for PTO. It’s based on rolling Q1-Q3 avg. Also, if you have more than 13 days verified PTO in a quarter, there is an exception process your leader can submit (as 13+ days verified PTO would put you under the 3 days a week threshold).
I was on the leader call, they showed a chart that showed you could not get an outstanding or effective if you did not meet the RTO policy for the year. Policy is 3 days per week in the office(includes pto time). Nothing like creating a policy at the end of the year.
@cq source
@cm my SVP mentioned in his recent org all-hands as well. If you don’t meet the RTO requirements, you won’t be eligible for promotions.
@cf was mentioned in call for people leaders for doing year end reviews. That avg number of days in office for the year will affect rankings
@ca where did you see that
There is no new RTO policy. Policy is and was for in office employees 4 days a week. Attendance is now part of year end reviews.
@OP yes, full time RTO for people receiving notices so they can find next gig and negotiate RTO there as well. Wake up!
@a9 front lines were not shielded last year, though they were told they were.
@a8 Front Lines shielded again?
The Monday announcement is who is losing their jobs