@c2 more regulatory scrutiny on the bank is a good thing dude. First because Wells desperately needs more oversight. But secondly because the absolute best years I had working here were the 3-4 years around and immediately following the scandal. Management actually had to put out real effort towards employee retentionto keep key people from leaving. We got shares, extra personal holidays. I had my job family and pay releveled twice during this period. I worked from home (well prior to the pandemic), did everything over conference call, and never had anyone question my productivity based on some arbitrary badge metric. Wells was actually investing capital into building up functions like risk rather than blowing it on stock buybacks. You can believe what Risk was doing had limited actual value (I think most people would agree), but I'd still rather work for a company that's investing in building up functions and opening up new roles and career paths, than work for a company where the C-suite is focused on stripping every team for parts.
The greater the risk that the CEO and board is of getting hauled in front of news cameras and congress to answer questions, the better this company is as a place to work.
Don't buy the deregulation=good hype