Thread regarding Cigna layoffs

Is anyone willing to file a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Claim Regarding the Discriminatory Firings?

An EEOC charge is a formal complaint filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging that an employer discriminated against you in violation of federal employment-discrimination law.

If you believe that you were laid off because of your race or national origin:

You file a charge with the EEOC describing what happened.

The EEOC can notify the employer and investigate.

The EEOC may request documents, interview people, and evaluate evidence.

The EEOC can potentially pursue the matter itself, particularly if it sees evidence of broader/systemic discrimination.

Eventually, the EEOC may issue a Notice of Right to Sue, which generally allows you to pursue the matter in federal court.

Importantly, you don't need a smoking-g-n statement like “we fired him because he's American.” The EEOC can consider patterns, statistics, comparator employees, hiring/termination records, and other circumstantial evidence.

Why this matters
Suppose 30 Black, White, Spanish, Chinese, etc. employees are laid off over several years, and many are replaced by Indians who subsequently hire predominantly Indian employees.

An individual employee might file an EEOC charge saying, essentially:
“I believe I was selected for termination because of my race/national origin. I also believe my termination was part of a broader practice in which similarly situated American employees are being replaced by Indian employees.”

The EEOC could potentially investigate the broader pattern, rather than simply asking whether that one employee was treated improperly.

That's one reason an EEOC charge can be significant even if a severance agreement contains a release. A severance agreement generally cannot prevent someone from filing a charge with the EEOC or participating in an EEOC investigation.

However, you generally can't wait indefinitely. For most private-sector Title VII discrimination claims, the deadline is 180 days, extended to 300 days in many circumstances where a state or local fair-employment agency also has jurisdiction.

So if someone was recently laid off, I'd speak with an employment attorney promptly rather than waiting to see how the company's hiring pattern develops.


by
| 57 views | | 14 replies (last 5 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m1jdnp1h

14 replies (most recent on top)

@d2 I have a mountain of evidence of discrimination. Buckle up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rn+1m1jdnp1h

Yes, as I am going through the interview processes, I am gathering documentations to file for my state.
It is all about false stereotypes. Smart people have a hard time getting into leadership because people who cannot do the work themselves want someone else to do it, while bullying smart people by saying they cannot communicate or lack executive presence. Not knowing that the leadership communication is a skill that can be taught in a three-week program, and everybody can learn it.
Now there is also a stereotype that Indians are the best in IT and innovation. But if we actually research on contributions to science and technology, the evidence doesn't support the stereotype. There is also a perception that Indian workers are more affordable. Onshore workers can be more expensive than American employees or receive equal pay, while offshore work, including inefficiencies and additional management costs, can sometimes end up costing more than hiring an American employee.

The sad thing is that if companies continue relying on these stereotypes while primarily hiring through their own communities and networks, it can create unfair barriers for qualified people from other backgrounds. If that becomes the norm, it could eventually leave our children with no opportunities in areas that support their interests. With great education and student loans, they will end up doing labor jobs, never buy a house, never afford having families, ect.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yc+1m1jdnp1h

Also, if rumors are true about employees that are let go without severance, that really opens the door for legal actions as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j7+1m1jdnp1h

Not illegal, but not transparent either.... By keeping employees on the payroll for exactly 30 days after notice, Cigna effectively structures these layoffs as temporary salary continuations rather than immediate terminations. Because the federal WARN Act looks for mass layoffs within a rolling 30-day or 90-day window at a single site, Cigna can surgically meter out terminations. By spreading the cuts out on the first Thursday of a full week of a month, they ensure the numbers never cross the specific state or federal legal thresholds (like 50 employees at a single site or 33% of a site's workforce) within that critical window. Even for two larger bi-annual cuts, spring and fall, distributing the remote or cross-functional workforce across different corporate cost centers keeps them legally under the radar.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j6+1m1jdnp1h

I am currently working with Dee to set up a class action lawsuit that will be far reaching.

I will post details here once my firm can share more information.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e6+1m1jdnp1h

@dw 🤣🤣🤣🤣

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1m1jdnp1h

Yes I hope many Americans will consider submitting an EEOC claims. Cigna and other companies are braking the law plain and simple. The irony is the country of origin complaint was not originally intended to protect Americans, but things have come full circle now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1m1jdnp1h

@d2 Looks like HR has joined the chat. Don't let them gaslight you...If you feel you have been discriminated against, you have every right to file a claim with the EEOC. Please do, because this company will continue to do this to everyone for as long as they get away with it. It is about time somebody fight back. Rather than just lay down as your job is outsourced and automated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1m1jdnp1h

I'm sorry you lost your job and understand that you're grasping at straws to find some way to go after Cigna. Good luck in your future endeavors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1m1jdnp1h

@cm I would say that all of these corporations are using a large number of non-American citizens at this time because the savings in doing so allows for the corporations to pour the labor savings into AI, which is very costly. But once AI can completely replace humans, they will also remove the non-American citizens workforce as well.

So, yes, in a sense, both American citizens AND non-American citizens are being discriminated against, seeing as how both sets are humans, unlike AI, which is not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cs+1m1jdnp1h

I mean then technically they are also discriminating against us for being human beings since we aren’t AI. 🤷🏻‍♀️

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cm+1m1jdnp1h

Of course they hire more Indians. For IT, HIH 100% Indians. Onshore I estimate 80-90% Indians including contractors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1m1jdnp1h

Yes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1m1jdnp1h

No.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1m1jdnp1h

Post a reply

: