Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

10/27 Tuesday Bloodbath Final Tally?

Do we have the final numbers yet? Usually it takes a day or two for the reports to come out. Any news?


by
| 458 views | | 24 replies (last 1 day ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m648rqzj

24 replies (most recent on top)

@vq Does that mean your 60 days starts on 10/27 or is this when your full severance kicks in?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @25k+1m648rqzj

@zj Honestly, watching some town halls is a pretty great way to see how dog sh-t our leadership is and learn a little bit about upcoming terms and layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11p+1m648rqzj

@bb town halls are worthless you weirdo “didn’t you watch the town hall???!???” Do better boot kicker !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zj+1m648rqzj

I was displaced on 10/27. I got a prenotice on 8/19 so I had 2.5 months to soften the blow and get a head start. My paper work showed 49 people in my org where also displaced. For the most part, I believe a lot of it was location strategy based. Best of luck to all those impacted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vq+1m648rqzj

Not sure, but I was part of it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @re+1m648rqzj

More people I work with were fired on Tuesday than any other Tuesday I can recall.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k5+1m648rqzj

Bunch of FC on Plantation Rd got nuked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g5+1m648rqzj

FCRM?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fs+1m648rqzj

I like how the truth gets downvoted, and the thread has devolved into a purse swinging contest. The OPs question has been answered, accurately. The End.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1m648rqzj

Corporate risk hit in several areas. I was one of them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e5+1m648rqzj

@e1 That's what I thought. Silly me for expecting a proven liar to do anything but lie when backed into a corner.

You're not acting in good faith and won't do anything but lie further. Have a good day Charlie :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e2+1m648rqzj

@dv you can look back at my posts, only you and OP ever used that language. I simply pointed out that this was openly discussed by leadership. Your lack of reading comprehension is not my problem, but does explain why you're having such a hard time understanding what you're being told here and by leadership.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1m648rqzj

@by You're the one who brought it up when asked to back up the specific claim about 10/27. You were caught lying to back up your first lie and now you're moving the goalposts. You're not fooling anyone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dv+1m648rqzj

@bt if you're expecting them to use that kind of language when talking about layoffs, you're a mo--n. But they openly talk about attrition, attrition goals, and attrition strategy, including layoff approaches.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @by+1m648rqzj

@bb Guess I fell asleep for the UPCOMING BLOODBATH announcements

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1m648rqzj

850-900. As usual, many more losses in COO than tech. Much smaller than the biggest wave of 2025, but still the largest single Tuesday of 2026.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bq+1m648rqzj

I heard tech was impacted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1m648rqzj

@b5 Did you not watch any of the town halls?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1m648rqzj

@b0 Where exactly was the company discussing 10/27 being “a mass layoff event” publicly?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1m648rqzj

@am It wasn't a secret, the company had already been open about the 27th being a mass layoff event and many LOBs were told ahead of time and given numbers. I don't understand all the naysayers here when the company itself had been discussing it publicly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1m648rqzj

You were right about October 27. People called that date beforehand in @OP+1m51ndeyn, and the person in @OP+1m5n7bpyf said on October 23 they’d already been told they were impacted the following Tuesday.

Then the October 27 reports came in:

So yes, the layoffs happened across several areas. I wouldn’t trust the big company-wide numbers being thrown around here yet, but the date wasn’t a false alarm.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1m648rqzj

No

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1m648rqzj

@a6

Such an ironic and utterly fitting number.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1m648rqzj

86 in DSM per WARN website.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1m648rqzj

Post a reply

: