Sampath or Stratton? Who do you think makes more sense and why?
15 replies (most recent on top)
If it was going to be Sampath, it would have happened now. Stratton would have been a better choice than Hans at the time, but that ship has sailed.
There is NO ONE on the current Leadership team who is remotely qualified, and good luck finding someone on the outside who would be willing to inherit this mess.
@cf Yes, many many times
@c9
Ever do an ops review with Stratton?
Stratton. I beg the board of directors to give us a ceo that speaks English we can understand.
Michael Sievert?
There is one guy who could disrupt the marketplace and make Verizon #1. But he would be expensive and is currently retired.
Biggest problem with leadership has been trying to find growth in a stagnant area.
Communication service needs to be reliable and network needs to be run efficiently. These executives keep coming up with shiny nonsense that consumers don’t care.
Honesty and simplicity are forgotten traits we really need.
Nick Jeffery
paging Michael Capellas
Neither. Sampath utterly useless and Stratton too old and has bad blood with the Board. You heard it here first, will not be either of them. Period.
@OP I don’t really care.
Stratton should have been picked instead of Hans
Should be Stratton.
Hopefully I’m still here and if I am here I prefer an American ceo
The sampaths of the world is why Verizon turned into cr-p in tha 1st place
Stratton. No question.