Anyone notice the salary grades seem to have lower maxes? Policy portal says it was updated 2 months ago.
11 replies (most recent on top)
For those wondering why the chart is useless, it's because they lump /everyone at a given grade/ together to obfuscate the data as much as possible. Actuaries, HR, analysts, developers, managers, everyone of a given grade gets put in the same bucket and they take the lowest salary and the highest salary and that's the range.
It’s gone up within the past couple of years
Managers will get role specific pay ranges the ones posted on the policy are “general” - location still matters too. Boston will be paid more that Westlake
I'm surprised they are still publishing those ranges
@ax 🙌 thanks for saving me from a pi---d off spiral
The numbers are identical to last year in November, I know because I took a screenshot and have it timestamped
yes, that is expected applicable only for g4's and g5 while whole of the org G6 and above especially the dinosaurs enjoys the spoils
Yes. Also the no. Of share pay out will be lesser as compared gi previous years.
There really needs to be more transparency with pay. For example my manager told me our group has a max pay that is actually is $15k lower than the pay grade chart.
Great, so no raises 4 years in a row.
great observation!