Thread regarding Fidelity Investments layoffs

18 replies (most recent on top)

@dv - casual collisions are up 400%!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fn+1m647qnv5

@c4 whatever they release will be sanitized and message spun to say how we love working with the people and that in office has contributed to the synergies etc

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dv+1m647qnv5

@aa That is an unbelievably cruel, insensitive and just pure evil comment. You need help

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dh+1m647qnv5

@aa what’s mandarin oriental mean?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d7+1m647qnv5

We should keep asking this question in discussions with our managers, HR, What’s Happening at Fidelity, town hall Q&A etc. I don’t care what the results are - we know they are bad - but I care about their unwillingness to release them like in “good” years prior and hypocrisy that they care about the feedback. Supposedly, they will release the results soon but the date keeps getting pushed back. We’ll see. The more attention we place on this topic, the more uncomfortable it will get for them to keep hiding the results.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1m647qnv5

@ay I heard that some VPs were told that pretty much all BUs had equally bad scores and they were deciding what would actually be worth sharing. This was about months ago, so guess the decision was to keep hiding the truth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1m647qnv5

@be On the contrary. The people who are the most positive generally have the highest salaries for doing the least amount of work, so fiscally speaking, the negative Nancy's are safe.

Also, if there were such a list of those who were super negative, said list would be anything BUT short. They'd end up having to terminate minimum of 25% of the workforce.

Third, it is anonymous, but for security reasons, not confidential. In the event they legally needed to find out who someone was due to threats of harm, etc, they could, but not through the general course of data provided.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1m647qnv5

hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahah

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bq+1m647qnv5

Lol. Never being published. There's only so many NPS scores of 1-3 you can bury.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bp+1m647qnv5

Here it is, hot and heavy...

If you were super negative on the survey, you are on the short list for the upcoming layoffs.

Survey is not anonymous.

Bo-m. Bo-m. And, bo-m.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1m647qnv5

Pulse survey? Why ruin the mystery with actual data? When morale is hovering near the Mariana Trench, keeping the survey results secret is basically a public service.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1m647qnv5

There is no freaking way that they will share results. I went scorched earth since I’m retiring after March. I’m sure a lot of others did too

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1m647qnv5

@ay not shared with people managers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1m647qnv5

@av Are there any people managers on here that confirm whether or not they've seen the results?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1m647qnv5

I heard they weren’t being shared with ICs this year. No clue if that’s accurate though

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1m647qnv5

top floor of the mandarin oriental

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1m647qnv5

These results will never see the light of day. If they do share them, they will be heavily manipulated and pitched to only share the narrative that the firm wants.

None of them polls are real, please don’t waste your time filling them out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1m647qnv5

Do a google search for "deepest hole being dug right now" then cross reference that location with the proximity of a major concrete plant, and that's where you'll find the Pulse results.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1m647qnv5

Post a reply

: