https://www.hcamag.com/us/specialization/employment-law/ex-manager-says-wells-fargo-cut-her-two-days-before-maternity-return/573568
16 replies (most recent on top)
Good. Better than coming back and being severed then. How is this any kind of controversy? 200k+ employees. One who is nearly done with an FMLA protected status is then displaced, likely with whatever severance they are entitled to.
So what is the outrage? That they cut her 2 days before having to deal with RTO or that they cut an employee who is a new parent? What about employees who are Old Parents? What about employees who only have pets as “children”?
The selective outrage is corny and played out. Get a bigger septum ring next time you’re refreshing your purple hair dye stock to make it easier for me to hook your face to my diesel pickup bumper.
About what I expected from someone with teeth so caked from boot polish that they look like licorice jellybeans.
Don't you have another strawman to quickly build up and conquer? Then you can go sit on an exec's lap like a little pet. Go now, have fun. Or don't, but don't come back 😗
It's the other team that wants authority figures, but otherwise I agree.
I think it is Charlie's back-handed approach to roll back another Wells Fargo legacy benefit. He just gets his jollies getting rid of Wells Fargo legacy "team members".
@af Incel comment. Found the weirdo, everyone!
@aj When we had to provide names for a round of RIFs, the names had to be given up in less than 10 minutes and the rationale was not discussed. we had no instructions on criteria or documentation. Rationale was discussed 4 to 6 weeks later when HR came asking, but it was an afterthought until that time.
These selections are messy, unstructured, and chaotic. hope more people speak up!
It seems that the comments on this site have become more negative and more aggressive against any posts that focus on things that are important to most employees of ANY company, not just WF. The troll comments must be coming from either one of Charlie's directs ghost writing as an actual employee, or from our MAGA-aligned workers that crave authoritarian figures. The posts are so ridiculously d-mb that there's no other plausible explanation. Boot. Lickers.
The burden of proof will on Wells Fargo to show that the layoff was not discriminatory. By the way, managers approve the specific layoffs but most of them are incompetent and illiterate They don't know the law and they are doers, not thinkers. Charlie may have gone to Johns Hopkins and worked at JP Morgan, but he is utterly useless.
@ad Not sure why you're getting downvoted. At least SOME of these cases have merit, and the more the c-suite has to worry about lawsuits and bad press, the better.
Once women have kids they generally become poor employees/co-workers, so at least we have one less of those to deal with.
Sorry, but going on maternity leave (or medical leave) doesn't make you special or protect you from layoffs.
There are thousands of similar or the same cases out there.....we all know of firsthand accounts involving ourselves or witnessed our colleagues and coworkers.
I hope that they ALL go through the courts. Not saying the plaintiffs are going to win every time, but we've all had enough of the gaslighting that WF has mastered against the employees...time for some accountability for the gross actions
Coudn't happen to a better company or better leadership!! :s
@a8
Good a good grip and pull that stick out of your axx...
Bootlicker, why go to an extreme strawman that you can sarcastically "vanquish"? Are you that desperate for anything you can call a "win" in your empty life, that posting this seemed like a good idea?
Pathetic.
..and she will win. At least 2 years backpay
That’s the shame. She should’ve been entitled to be paid for free the rest of her life.