Stankey stands to make a lot of money from this deal from his stock holdings. However, employees were forced to sell their stocks that they received via 401 match at a huge loss. How is this legal?
9 replies (most recent on top)
"Their stock dropped significantly because it was mismanaged while AT&T had ownership"
I will give you one guess who was at the helm making decisions when he (JS) tanked the company! Yep, good ol' Stankey making decisions that ki-led revenue. All of his decisions were reversed once new leadership was hired. You can Google and get tons of stories about how he sc--wed things up at Warner while he ran it into the ground.
Their stock dropped significantly because it was mismanaged while AT&T had ownership
I randomly got contacted that I had shares of WBD that were about to go to unclaimed property. Excuse me? Like how did they get 'out' of my 401k during the rollover. Good thing I have have an account that I could transfer them into, but what a pain in the butt.
"Maybe it broke the site rules or something."
Nah -- some of the site monitors are very temperamental towards the big T and will protect it unreasonably.
“ Pick your lane already.”
How’s about you go nap in the fast lane.
Even if you didn’t sell and still held right now youd still be holding nearly a 50% loss even after yesterdays gain
@a8+1k4xr91v5 Maybe it broke the site rules or something. Threads often get nuked because they broke some rule relating to this site I think.
Yes, wealth gap is THE issue. But yawl b1tch and moan about other working class folks instead.
So, stop complaining about Stanley’s wealth and continue to complain about immigration, outsourcing, H1Bs, TDPs, WFHers, non-hubbers, etc…….
Pick your lane already.
I told you weeks ago. Stankey makes a lot of money, just not for AT&T. The thread got deleted. Why can't you understand this?