#criteria

is it by performance or bcuz of location, or just pure hatred?

Do you know what kind of criteria was used to select people? I mean, THE REAL CRITERIA, not the BS they are feeding us

From what I’ve seen, none of it makes sense unless you look at the cost savings. Which means nothing will actually get fixed, but a whole lot of people who truly know what they’re doing will be gone.

I recently chatted with a friend who specializes in restructurings, and she shared some thoughts on reimagined.

The duration and scale of this consulting project indicate that the target for headcount reduction is more than 15%.

ISPs are probably going to lose access to their laptops within a week. The 60-day period to reapply for other positions is likely nonsense. Once ISPs are informed, they won’t want them snapping photos of sensitive client data and sharing it on the dark web.

They probably had an idea of who they were letting go back in January. Typically, leaders assess their employees based on current skills and their potential for retraining.

Despite all the dishonesty and deceit, my friend believes PP is doing well. Her aim is to boost GP profits, and cutting over 1000 jobs will definitely enhance GP returns.

Happy Hunger Games!

Honest question but how does this stuff actually go down from higher up in the company? Like are there just some bean counters in finance that “make a list”, or is there more involvement from the lower-level management? The only reason I’m asking is because we lost a ton of historical and impactful engineers. I was honestly shocked to see how many folks like that were let go 😞.

Also, I can’t wait to read the next Cisco Beat-down chat.. of yeah they disabled it!!! Never mind lol.

What is the definition of a HiPo (high potential)at Halliburton?

Is it based on a particular level?