The analysis shows “a clear and troubling pattern,” the report concludes. “A pattern of long-term, systematic failure to invest in the infrastructure required to provide equitable, mainstream Internet access to residents of the central city (compared to the suburbs) and to lower-income city neighborhoods.”
7 replies (most recent on top)
With local government in their pockets, their Phantom deployments served them well, typically news articles, or PR campaigns is all we hear
I thought they were obligated to provide decent, low income service as a part of a the agreement with the feds for approval of, was it the Cingular deal?
I remember working UVerse distribution conditioning, Pits were open in poor neighborhoods, but technicians were never dispatched to those jobs, I figured that they just needed a record from Mastec, to bill the state under current telecom laws, very slick
The T has done that for years, if it's not a big money maker for them they toss it to the side of th road! That includes loyal customers 80+ years of age....sad way to treat people!
as compared to the 1% that controls all the wealth of the world. if that is the case your in poor class as well.
This is illegal, this should be looked at as part of the TW acquisition.
Should this type of corporate management have more control over the telecommunications industry?
I'm not surprised.