Here's what worries me about the ITOM and Cyber numbers. OT describes Content, Business Network, ITOM and Enterprise Cybersecurity as the Core businesses that drive growth. Yet in Q1, ITOM fell 12.3% and Enterprise Cyber fell 12.4% YoY.
Management's response wasn't that these businesses are expected to remain in decline. AA said every Core category is expected to grow for FY27, including ITOM and Cyber, with improvement expected each quarter from here. That's a very public commitment.
My personal view is that if the revenue turnaround doesn't happen quickly, the alternative route to preserving financial performance will be more aggressive cost reduction. I wouldn't be surprised at all if ITOM and Cyber end up under particularly heavy scrutiny.
I don't have inside information that layoffs are coming to those groups. But when two "Core growth" businesses are declining at double-digit rates, while the company is simultaneously executing a savings program targeting roughly $580M annually, I don't think it's unreasonable to connect the dots and ask where additional savings could come from.
This is what concerns me about the current version of "growth." Cutting expenses can improve margins, EPS and cash flow. It can make the financial picture look better. But cost reduction is not the same thing as growing a technology business. Eventually the revenue line has to prove the strategy is working.
If ITOM and Cyber are still declining materially over the next few quarters, my guess is that the response won't just be another PowerPoint about execution. The pressure to take costs and people out of those businesses could become very real.