Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

“Massive Destruction of Capital”

Use your favorite AI to analyze AT&Ts business savvy with regard to AT&T Mexico. “Massive Destruction of Capital” is probably my favorite term that was used in its analysis. Par for the course. It is literally THE ONLY THING that Stankey and team are good at. And they excel at it. And no one is EVER held accountable to the shareholders by the BOD. EVER.

“ • The Entry (2015): AT&T aggressively entered the market by acquiring Iusacell for $2.5 billion and Nextel Mexico for $1.875 billion, totaling roughly $4.375 billion in headline acquisition costs.
• The Exit (2026): After more than a decade of operations, AT&T agreed to sell the unit to a consortium of Grupo Televisa and Fintech Holdings for just $2 billion in cash.
This means AT&T recovered less than half of its original purchase price, completely erasing over $2.3 billion in asset value. This calculation doesn't even account for the billions of additional dollars AT&T poured into building out its Mexican 4G/5G infrastructure and funding years of operating losses over the last 11 years“


by
| 211 views | | 12 replies (last 28 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m4xamjf4

12 replies (most recent on top)

@OP Excellent summary but it doesn't capture all the money we would have wasted on transformation and operational expense. But despite the countless failures, stock awards and dividends are still putting tens of millions in the pockets of our executives.

How sad is it that we are the phone company and we can't even manage ~20 million subscribers in Mexico? Stankey will blame it on regional instability or - who knows, Market Driven word salad... at the end of the day, the smartest man in the room can't seem to figure out how to make money selling mobility services in a third world country. Pathetic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @et+1m4xamjf4

OP-

A little louder for those sitting in the back!

T will have MORE layoffs as a result of “leadership” bad decisions!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1m4xamjf4

and what about years ago when he said work crazy sh*t on employee calls — so bad that HR lady quit and the video couldn’t be shared… like WTF does he have on everyone?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1m4xamjf4

All these purchases were big W T F moments to everyone, so why did the Board think it was smart business?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1m4xamjf4

@ac , he made a Faustian deal with Old Scratch.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1m4xamjf4

Some additional AI research: $4.5B purchase price. Maybe $10B in capital investments through the years.

Operating loss of about $718 million for 2021–25.

Critically:
Thaddeus Arroyo — 2015–2016; the first CEO after AT&T entered Mexico.
Kelly King — 2016–2018.
Laurent Therivel — 2018–2020; he took over from King in late 2018.
Mónica Aspe Bernal — appointed interim CEO in April 2020, then confirmed as CEO in 2021

Stankey's roles:
Through 2015: Chief Strategy Officer and group president.
From July 2020: AT&T CEO and president; elected chairman in February 2025.

I'm not good at connecting dots. Can anyone find a pattern here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b3+1m4xamjf4

But think of all the trips stank took to Puerto Vallarta and Cancun. The sunburn he got on his chrome dome was only on the level of the redness of the hot pepper challenge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1m4xamjf4

Stink has the opposite of the Midas touch. Everything he touches turns to sh!t

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1m4xamjf4

How is Stankey still in charge of at&t? Has he sold any asset that produced a profit? The answer is no, I would like to see the total loss number accumulated associated with all the asset sales during his tenure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1m4xamjf4

Asked AI

how much would an account with the value of 4.375B on April 30, 2015 be worth today if it was invested in the S&P500 with dividends reinvested?

Answer
Approximately $18–20 billion

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1m4xamjf4

Zero accountability. It’s mind boggling.

Yet you have VPs dinging you because you banged out a half hour early 2 Fridays ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1m4xamjf4

At least they’re consistent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1m4xamjf4

Post a reply

: