Generally speaking, deploying AI productivity tools enterprise-wide while simultaneously (according to forum evidence) manufacturing false performance records, there is now a situation where:
• Employee-created AI records are discoverable and preserve their own narrative
• Restricting AI use to suppress that evidence creates its own legal exposure
• The AI infrastructure itself is a witness to the contradiction between actual
performance and fabricated ratings
• Any attempt to destroy or suppress AI-generated records after litigation is
anticipated is a federal evidence preservation violation
6 replies (most recent on top)
AI slop vs human slop ?......which is more profitable and less expensive ?
AI;DR
This is why AI will fail to be a useful technology. It's not good enough to trust without double-checking, and most people who are going to rely on it aren't smart enough to double-check that it isn't hallucinating, let alone producing unintelligible boilerplate buzzword-laden garbage.
Which explains why executives love it for making their job easier.
Lol "according to forum evidence"
hey if a mgr doesnt want to hear of positives for an employee, an objective mechanism is relevant and must be preserved
that aint slop
the slop is mgmt
So, you used AI slop to promote using AI slop? GTFO