Not among the peons, but among management? Those who earn $250k and more and do nothing useful. We would certainly need to cut significantly fewer people to achieve the same saving goal with that strategy.
8 replies (most recent on top)
@OP 250k is basically the required household income to buy a house right now.
@ce the entire RPO group. Let OGC run it and I promise it will be realized that we don’t need this many people doing fake work. Let’s just move the real work where it belongs - in the OGC Ops team. RPO creates their own work and makes more work for us which takes away from our ability to do our REAL work. It’s really simple. If the whole organization can just stop padding and creating teams like RPO the company would save millions. Besides that this team is a COST center and doesn’t generate ANY revenue! Create all of the fake requests you want but you can’t convince me that we need this team. The 9 headcount and over $1 million in salary alone while other teams struggle to get their work done and are forced to do more with less. The Resilience and OGC SVP and VP should be ashamed of this irresponsible structure and spending.
They make the decisions and will never give up their power. So the peons pay.
The problem is also the leaders who built these massive duplicative orgs have already done the damage. You can oust them, but you also have to oust the entire structure under them that isn't serving any purpose or the void will just get filled with another opportunist
Then what’s the point of living in Oregon? You have to pay people that much just to live here and sacrifice their lives to live in Oregon. That’s the only way they can actually recruit people. It’s also the reason why when people leave they immediately get out of the state.
If they move the headquarters to a better place, they could probably pay a much more reasonable variety of compensation. Until then, they have to pay Bay Area salaries.
@bk The s h i t t y org. structure and layoff decisions
Because those are the people making the org. structure and layoff decisions?
Yes that is where the cost savings are. Nike is top heavy.