Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

US Bank Employees Receive Pay Cuts While CEOs Rake in Millions

I was out filling up my vehicle to the tune of $4.28 a gallon and it got me thinking about how this company has been exploiting us all in every way.

If you follow the government's inflation numbers(CPI), prices are up 8.3 percent since January 2024. So unless your salary grew by 8.3 percent you effectively got a pay cut.

Over that same stretch, from the bank's own SEC filings: the CEO's base salary went from $1,000,000 to $1,200,000, with a cash incentive target of 275 percent of base and another $1,500,000 in stock. The outgoing CEO stepped down to Executive Chairman at a $1,400,000 base — more than the sitting CEO makes.

For us low caste employees, hypothetically on a $95,000 salary that's $7,900 a year you should be making and aren't. For merit increases, a token 2 percent leaves you 6.3 points short, about $6,000. The 3 percent that felt like a win is still 5.3 points short, $5,000 gone. Even a 5 percent year, which almost none of us saw, lands 3.3 points short.

Then there's the time they stole from us. RTO three days a week at 45 minutes each way is 216 hours a year. That is 5.4 work-weeks we work for free. Our year is 2,296 hours now, not 2,080. It never shows up on a pay stub. That's exactly why they can take it.

Then there's the driving. Thirty miles each way, three days a week, is 9,500 miles a year. Gas is up 24.6 percent in twelve months. The IRS raised its own mileage rate mid-year to 76 cents a mile because running a car got that much more expensive. That's $7,200 a year, and we pay it with after-tax dollars, so we have to earn about $11,000 to cover it.

Stack all three and our real hourly rate is down between 18 and 25 percent. Someone at $95,000 was making $45.67 an hour. They make about $35 now.

I know there are some braindead boomers and beta-male bootlickers in here who will say to su-k it up, but when I run the numbers I don't see how I can do that. I assume any of you in here saying that just really enjoy getting bent over. Any reasonable person would be angry.


by
| 131 views | | 14 replies (last 11 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m277c1v6

14 replies (most recent on top)

Where was all this outcry when Andy was raking in the big bucks? He was the worst CEO in banking even though he lasted only 5 years. Union Bank was a BIG mess and let's not forget that he is the m-o-r-o-n who put Gunjan in charge that started our downfall.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nr+1m277c1v6

@gw you like to be-doverand take it I assume?

Last I checked, the US does not have an officially declared form of economy. Therefore I am not required to worship capitalism at the expense of our populace or our culture. I am as right leaning as it gets, and I recognize the harm our current interpretation of economics is doing to the citizens of our nation.

Meat-riding for capitalism is absolute sheep behavior.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nn+1m277c1v6

You just learned how capitalism works?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gw+1m277c1v6

The "little guy just trying to get by" is the reason sociopaths like gunjan can get away with treating their employees like trash. They know you will take it and won't stand up. She probably looks out at her office into the parking garage and thinks, "I pay all these car notes, they can't possibly leave."

Do better.

And no, complaining about "cheeto man" and voting will not fix the issue. If voting mattered they wouldn't let you do it. We'll get some flaming libtard as the next president and nothing will change, but y'all will be seal clapping over some DEI nonsense that clearly doesn't move the needle economically. If you really wanted to be an advocate for change you would do it with your actions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1m277c1v6

@e4 You are right, OP calls the little guy just trying to get by bootlickers and thinks thats OK. Let’s make changes by voting. Get rid of all the bootlickers supporting cheeto-face man. The major tech companies are the biggest bootlickers of all and maybe even brown-nosers. Lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eb+1m277c1v6

@e4 While working, commuting, following the rules, etc. is all well and good, the gap between c-suite pay and average worker pay can't possibly justify continuing the same way while a k-shaped economy just widens.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e9+1m277c1v6

Excellent analysis and explanation @b3 and OP

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1m277c1v6

@ct got ourselves a doomscroller here. No, no I didn't.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cv+1m277c1v6

@cq Did you use Copilot or ChatGPT to compose that paragraph?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1m277c1v6

Infinite growth mindset will be the death of us all. By definition it is unsustainable and the lower castes are always the first to suffer. Change starts with all of us - stop doomscrolling and start reading books that prime your brain for actionable change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1m277c1v6

I have been saying this for a long time 2 hours of unpaid commute is 2 hours stole. From you each day, meanwhile, the CEO pay increase and lives in the 4 Seasons hotel, paid by the Bank. Their commute is different from ours

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bz+1m277c1v6

@b2 exactly. The elite shareholders that own everything aren't happy, they need more money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1m277c1v6
Effective Pay Cut Formula

Original hourly rate

$95,000 / 2,080 hours = $45.67/hour

Commute time

3 days/week × 1.5 hours/day × 48 weeks = 216 unpaid hours/year

2,080 + 216 = 2,296 effective hours/year

Commute cost

60 miles/day × 3 days/week × 48 weeks = 8,640 miles/year

8,640 miles × $0.76/mile = $6,566/year

Effective hourly pay

(Salary after raise - Annual commute cost)

(2,080 work hours + 216 commute hours) × (1 + inflation)

For a $95,000 salary, no raise, and 8.3% inflation:

($95,000 - $6,566) / (2,296 × 1.083)
= $35.57/hour

Effective pay cut

1 - ($35.57 / $45.67) = 22.1%

### General Formula

Effective Pay Cut % =

1 - [((Salary × (1 + Raise %)) - Commute Cost)
/ ((2,080 + Commute Hours) × (1 + Inflation %))]
/ (Salary / 2,080)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b3+1m277c1v6

capitalism in the 21st century

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1m277c1v6

Post a reply

: