Honest question just thinking out loud and venting! I know it’s d-mb and prob a big oh waste of time thinking this but since we the ones who took the VSP thinking our separation date would be Sept 2026 and now some of us are not getting that date is this or can it be classified as a breech? Just wondering since now we cannot even change our minds and withdraw our VSP after the fact of our separation date now being into 2027! I wish now at this point we could withdraw our VSP!
14 replies (most recent on top)
Go back and read all of the contents. Trust me they covered themselves, and if I’m not mistaken, there was some language in there that said you will be you will work until the separation date which could get extended something to that nature.
@a2 vsp applicants cant apply for internal roles it says it in the updated FAQ
@aq if you applied for the VSP you actually do not have a choice now. It’s no longer an option to reject the offer. Your only option would be to quit without the payout.
Hello friend. Reading is fundamental. All the documents clearly stated that your separation date could be sooner or later, based on their needs. You can stay working the year or quit at any time, as you've always been welcome to do. You took it because you wanted to separate from the company. It's literally in the title: "Voluntary SEPARATION". You showed your hand that you don't want to stay, and they showed theirs that they need you. You can leave for free or just be a terrible employee for the next year. Up to you.
People are kicking about 2027 dates? Do you have any idea what the job market is like? Centene just gave you a paid runway of over a year if Nov 2027--and I thought I had it good with a 6 month runway when WellCare was acquired, which turned out to be the start of the Covid recession.
Simply do your job for the next months and keep looking. If you find something good externally or internally, take it and leave the 'package' behind. Also, make sure that they cannot terminate the package early without compensating you as if you were working. In other words, laying you off despite agreeing to the VSP and an extended date.
I realize this isn't the answer you want to hear, but I'm speaking from experience having been termed during what turned out to be a bad time for the next two years. Staying in the job and looking in 2027 is a better position than being out this fall. You do have a choice of not signing, of course, and taking your chances in a layoff, rather than planning your future knowing what you have by a certain date.
@a5 and that is exactly why I did not take it.
Also don’t forget we haven’t signed the offer yet. You have to actually say I accept the VSP in its form.. you still have the right to quit and as stated in the FAQ they still have the right to fire you during that time. They’re saying you have to stay. You don’t have to do anything! Now we all would’ve wanted the severance and the date they had implied. I got one of the November 2027 dates and there’s no way I am sticking around that long… Talk about torture.
Please get an employment attorney.
Basically, anything in writing will hold more weight than assumptions, thoughts, etc in court. When they announced the Sept date, it was what they decided on at the time. When they realized more people accepted than expected, they had to determine the best way to do it while LEGALLY protecting themselves. From a legal risk aspect, EMPLOYERS often receive the greater legal benefit. One of the protections THEY have is you won’t be able to sue them once you accept it. This is one of the reasons why they recommend an employment attorney so you can be aware of any rights and potential issues you may have, including any changes to end dates. You MUST read and understand what you’re getting yourself into because what they tell you does NOT override what is in those legal documents
I guess the key term here is "took the VSP thinking" - thinking is not really a legal bindings. You have to have something in written/signed that mention Sept 2026 will be the separation date without any but/if. Else it is not "BREECH OF CONTRACT"
My VSP offer was full of "subject to change" that is why I chose not to take it. I knew there would be too many variables to maintain control of the outcome.
@OP hey! Let’s use AI to answer this. Muahah: Yes, legal recourse may still exist, primarily because a six-month delay constitutes a "material change" to the agreement, and the employer cannot legally hold an employee in limbo without mutual consent.Key Legal ConsiderationsMaterial Breach of Contract: A six-month delay fundamentally changes the value of the bargain. If the original offer implied a specific timeline, delaying it indefinitely while blocking you from backing out is a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.Illusory Contracts: A contract where one side can completely change the terms (like moving a date by half a year) while the other side is locked in can be viewed by courts as "illusory" and therefore unenforceable.Constructive Dismissal: Forcing an employee to remain in an altered, uncertain employment status for an extended period under threat of losing their severance can resemble a forced termination or constructive discharge.Promissory Estoppel: If the employee made major life decisions (like securing a new job, moving, or retiring) based on the original timeline, they can sue for damages caused by relying on the employer's original promise.
Speaking entirely as a non-lawyer, I doubt you'd have a case. When the 9/4 date was presented, you hadn't signed anything yet, so no contract was probably established. But I'll let those here who are more educated about contract law fill in those gaps if they are so inclined.
No, based on the facts as described, this is unlikely to constitute a breach of contract in most employment/VSP contexts—though the answer turns entirely on the specific language of the VSP documents you signed, any accompanying communications, and applicable state law.
Core elements of a breach claim
To establish breach of contract you generally need:
A valid, enforceable contract (offer, acceptance, consideration).
Your performance (or readiness to perform).
A material breach by the other party of a specific obligation.
Resulting damages.
A voluntary separation program (VSP) is typically a unilateral offer by the employer that becomes a contract once you accept it in writing. The enforceable terms are almost always those set out in the formal VSP agreement, election form, plan document, or summary plan description—not informal expectations, internal talk, or assumed timelines.
Why a changed separation date usually is not a breach
Most VSPs expressly reserve to the company the right to set, adjust, or sequence separation dates based on business needs, operational continuity, or administrative factors. If the documents say the date is “estimated,” “targeted,” “approximate,” or “subject to change,” or give the employer discretion over timing, then moving some people from a September 2026 target into 2027 is generally within the contract.
Even without explicit reservation language, courts often treat separation timing as non-material when the core consideration (severance pay, benefits continuation, release of claims, etc.) remains the same. A later date may actually increase total pay or benefits in some packages.
Once you irrevocably elect the VSP, most programs make the election binding and waive any right to withdraw. That is a standard, enforceable term. The inability to withdraw after the date shift does not itself create a breach; it is usually what you already agreed to.
When it could become a problem
It would be more arguable if:
The written VSP materials (or a specific written representation that induced your acceptance) locked in a firm September 2026 date as a material term with no reservation of rights.
The company made a clear, written promise of that exact date that you reasonably relied on, and the later change is a material alteration of the bargain (e.g., it causes you to lose a specific subsequent opportunity, retirement eligibility window, or other concrete benefit that was part of the deal).
There is evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or bad-faith manipulation of dates after acceptance.
Even then, remedies are limited. Specific performance (forcing an earlier date) is rare in employment contracts. The usual claim would be for damages caused by the delay, which are often hard to prove and may be capped or released by the VSP’s own release language.
Practical realities
You almost certainly signed a release of claims as a condition of receiving the VSP benefits. That release typically covers contract claims arising out of the separation itself.
Employment is usually at-will; the VSP is an exception that creates limited contractual rights, not an entitlement to dictate the exact calendar date.
Courts give employers significant latitude in administering voluntary exit programs.
What you should do
Pull every document related to the VSP—offer letter, election form, plan summary, FAQs, any emails or written Q&A that mentioned dates—and read the exact language on timing, reservation of rights, irrevocability, and the release.
Compare what was written against what was said orally or in town halls. Or-l statements rarely override clear written terms.
If the documents appear to guarantee a firm September 2026 date with no flexibility, consult an employment attorney in your state promptly. Bring the full packet. Many offer free or low-cost initial consultations.
Do not rely on internal HR assurances alone; get any clarification in writing.
This is general information based on typical VSP structures and contract principles, not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney who has reviewed your specific documents and jurisdiction. Your facts, the exact contract language, and local law control the outcome. If the written materials are ambiguous or appear to lock in the earlier date, that is the point at which a lawyer can give you a meaningful assessment.