Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

WBD Sale - a total disaster for Stink

Stank keeps talking about being a “market-based company,” but the market has already delivered its verdict, and it is absolutely brutal.

Just look at the scoreboard.

AT&T’s market cap today is around $180B.
Netflix, a company AT&T once thought it could compete with through the WarnerMedia empire, is sitting around $430B+. Netflix is worth more than double AT&T. That alone tells you everything about which company the market believes in.

And when you look at how we got here, it’s even worse.

AT&T bought Time Warner for roughly $85B, swallowed billions more in debt, tried to play Hollywood, mismanaged the integration, then spun it off in 2022 into Warner Bros Discovery wiping out over 50 of billion in value.
WBD stock fell as low as $7.50, and even now AT&T stock at roughly $25.46 is trading below WBD’s $25.80.
An $85B asset turned into a fraction of its worth, and now WBD is being shopped to Netflix for double compared to the sale and divestiture price.

Billions burned.

A strategic failure so large business schools literally teach it.
And the company has spent the last five years trying to claw its way back to where it was BEFORE all these “visionary decisions.”

So when Stankey and the leadership team brag about “market-based” strategy, it’s a joke the actual market doesn’t find funny. Wall Street sees right through it. Investors have no confidence. Employees have no confidence. The stock has gone nowhere during his tenure, and the company’s major bets have been disasters.

If AT&T truly wants to operate like a modern, market-led company, then start acting like one beginning with ending his latest “visionary decision” - the outdated RTO obsession that adds cost, crushes morale, pushes out top talent, and delivers zero measurable business benefit. Wait too long and you’ll never recover from that too.

Real market-based companies reduce overhead, increase flexibility, retain talent, and innovate.
AT&T is doing the opposite and the market has priced that in loud and clear.

Leadership can keep talking about culture, presence, and “the plan,” but the numbers don’t lie.
The strategy isn’t working.
And the market knows it.
And so do we.


by
| 1272 views | | 10 replies (last December 8) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kbv8r5f5

10 replies (most recent on top)

Paramount just issued a hostile bid For Warner Bros. Discovery for 108.4 Billion. More than twice what Stankey dumped it for. What a Genius. This is worse than The T mobile debacle that Randall and Stink came up with!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gy+1kbv8r5f5

everyone who does nothing just lets this pattern repeat itself. elliot management was the only one with a set that handed him his stones and made him choke on them.

instead of posting here - write to your local papers editorial sections and shine a line on this man.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1kbv8r5f5

$200B at a minimum of shareholder value vaporized by a man nobody wants to work for and is still CEO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1kbv8r5f5

Lost billions of dollars because of incompetence and arrogance, yet he blames all the other employees for his mistakes and continues to lay them off or persuade them to quit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cg+1kbv8r5f5

We all know what happened.

They bet the farm on the Warner Bros merger and it failed miserably.

Everything since that time has been a direct result of that enormously reckless wager.

ATT is the biggest loser

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1kbv8r5f5

Agree 100%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1kbv8r5f5

@am I think the point is you stop enabling decisions of the guy who burned nearly $100Bn. RTO is layoff exercise because of the bad business deals at the top.
Also, happy employees are good employees. Why would you prefer to make people’s lives harder and not easier? Do you think that’s motivating? Ge-z.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1kbv8r5f5

@am AT&T spends enormous amounts each year maintaining office space through real estate, utilities, maintenance, security, cleaning, and on-site operations. Industry data shows these costs average between $12,000 and $14,000 per employee annually. With roughly 150,000 U.S. employees, that means more than $2 billion every year just to keep offices running. If even half the workforce transitioned to hybrid or remote work, the company could save around $1 billion in overhead. Combine that with reduced turnover, since flexible work increases retention and engagement, and total potential savings easily reach $3 billion or more per year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1kbv8r5f5

So restoring WFH is the answer? By any measure the company has employee bloat (management and non-management), and needs to reduce HC. WFH was one option that helped save money from paying severance; like it or not, T is a business, not a charity or a monopoly. While I don't believe there is any single cause or action to be taken that can improve financials, WFH is not one of them. I'm talking about things that will improve T as a business financially, not things that employees want to make their life easier.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1kbv8r5f5

Mr. Stankey was right about one major thing. HBO really did not make enough money. He told HBO to be more like Netflix, they didn't l, and now they will be owned by Netflix!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1kbv8r5f5

Post a reply

: