Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

BREAKING: Dan Schulman CEO (former Paypal) - Hans OUT


by
| 6011 views | | 21 replies (last October 29) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k6wrcy4j

21 replies (most recent on top)

VBG person here in a 5G focused org and found out today most of our group will be cut. Some estimates are up to 15% across VBG to pay for improvements in VCG. Sounds like Schulman will be up to his old tricks from Paypal days. Most impacted will be off payroll by the EOY. Unfortunately, I will most likely be impacted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ka+1k6wrcy4j

I just got used to say 5yee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g5+1k6wrcy4j

This all smacks of, we couldn't find someone from our bench to take over so we had to pull in someone from the board. It all really points to Stratton who was passed over for Hans and went to run Frontier. I suspect he'll be the one taking over once the desk is done and Hans is actually gone in October of next year.

It will really be a big F U from Stratton if it happens that way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1k6wrcy4j

Thought I'd share... Interesting, "Retirement"..
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hansvestberg_this-morning-i-stepped-down-as-ceo-and-chairman-activity-7380986548697182208-cdWk?utm_source=social_share_video_v2&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAABE4wb0BIsnnvr-GN4A4CT2S51P6ZmbRqo4&utm_campaign=copy_link

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1k6wrcy4j

Hans was booted because nobody could Sanders and his accent. He’s a Swede, but sounded super German, almost Hogan’s Heroes level.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1k6wrcy4j

back in the old days, I remember McAdam telling us that he felt confident with Hans' taking over and that VZ had a "deep bench" to help with the transition. Hans collected tens of millions while destroying the brand, he probably has quite a few stock options to cash in as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1k6wrcy4j

@OP

Let’s be honest — this wasn’t some smooth “succession plan.” The timing alone tells you everything. Vestberg is out abruptly, Schulman is parachuted in from the board, and Hans is parked in an “advisor” seat to save face. Classic board playbook: push out the old regime, rebrand the strategy, and make it look like a controlled transition.

They spent years selling us on the idea that network leadership was all that mattered — and now, suddenly, they want a platform builder and “ecosystem” guy from PayPal to run a telecom company. If that doesn’t scream strategic pivot under shareholder pressure, I don’t know what does.

The writing’s on the wall: the board lost patience with slow growth, missed revenue opportunities, and a stagnant stock. Hans built the infrastructure — Schulman’s job is to monetize it. And when a CEO exits like this but stays “on the board,” it’s not a vote of confidence… it’s a polite way of showing him the door.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1k6wrcy4j

Sampath ain’t the guy. If he was, he’d be put in. Either he’s got it or he doesn’t. Time doesn’t do anything from his current role.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1k6wrcy4j

Something doesn’t add up. New CEO is 67. Isn’t there a rule where the CEO has to leave at age 65?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1k6wrcy4j

@a8 That is a hint right there that he was not vaulted into CEO role.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1k6wrcy4j

Wow Hans himself (probably) got RIFd.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1k6wrcy4j

Hans finally gets to participate in the Verizon "Home for the holidays program!"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k6wrcy4j

Do Scampath now

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1k6wrcy4j

We’ll be complaining about Dan by Friday.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1k6wrcy4j

Anything would be better than Hans

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1k6wrcy4j

Christmas came 2 months and 19 days early!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1k6wrcy4j

Will he continue the policy of "Layoff everyone until there are no employees to fire"

will he pivot away from building us as consultation firm for how to layoff every person in your company.

I'm bitter. end of childish rant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1k6wrcy4j

Wow Christmas has come early

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k6wrcy4j

source: grok
prompt: give me the brief bullet points good bad for employees for dan schulman
response:
Good for EmployeesImplemented Employee Financial Wellness Initiative, raising net disposable income to 16% on average by lowering healthcare costs 60%, providing equity, and offering financial education, leading to 4x higher engagement and 3x lower turnover.

forbes.com +1

Closed gender and race pay gaps with a $3 million investment, evaluating pay three times yearly for all 20,000 employees to attract and retain top talent.

cnbc.com

Pledged no layoffs during COVID-19, enabling remote work and prioritizing employee security over short-term profits.

calcalistech.com +1

Offered $25 million in interest-free cash advances to furloughed U.S. government workers during shutdowns, extending similar support to PayPal's own staff.

en.wikipedia.org

Fostered inclusive culture by opposing discriminatory laws (e.g., North Carolina bathroom bill) and committing $535 million to racial equity, boosting employee morale and trust.

en.wikipedia.org +1

Bad for EmployeesOversaw 2,000 layoffs (7% of workforce) in 2023 amid economic challenges, despite prior employee-first pledges, contributing to job insecurity.

cnbc.com +1

Employee reviews highlight issues with senior leadership and management under his tenure, including unclear growth prospects and reliance on external cuts.

glassdoor.com +1

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1k6wrcy4j

Finally!!! I know nothing about the new guy but he can't be worse than Hans!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1k6wrcy4j

Post a reply

: