Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Corporate behavior - is it right?

In the 60's companies believed they had a moral obligation to take care of their employees.

This included pensions, health care benefits, and investing in the cities they operated in.

My how things have changed - todays corporate charter is much different.

"If you say, as an individual, 'My only interest is to maximize my advantages,' which is what they say at the corporate level, then you are a sociopath" -- Jeremy Grantham

The social contract between worker and employer is profoundly broken.

And you can see it - today, it was reported that wells fargo might get a new fine for failing to timely correct the mistakes of prior regime.

Result of that post? Over 1500 views in less than 1 day and over 30 upvotes.

What this means is that employees do not feel compelled to be on the side of the people who pay their salary - its very telling that employees clearly feel the entire system is broken.

The bank does not care at all about the employees - this is why Wells Fargo is offshoring as many jobs as possible to India as fast as they possibly can.

See, Indian nationals living in India are not part of the American political system - they cant vote.

The mad dash of offshoring not only has the net effect of making the american worker poorer, but it also has the added bonus of silencing you - as your life style is such that to support what empire you personally have built, to continue to service your debt you'd have to have 2 or 3 menial jobs just to keep your head above water if you lost your job at the bank.

If you working all the time, you are unlikely to participate much in the political process or protests or anything of the like.

The owners - the executives and boards of companies like this - have a grand scheme to make sure that in America, only their political contributions and their voice are heard.

Meanwhile in China, they are passing "wealth distribution" laws to make sure the uber rich share their gains with the population.

That will never happen in USA - we are stuck in a system that preys upon its workers, silences them, enriches the already rich, and when the worker is no longer useful, discards them like a used paper bag.

A nation that abuses its workers like this is soon destined for the scrap heap of history - the French learned it the hard way.

America is young....but she too will learn some valuable lessons likely in the next election cycle.

by
| 6409 views | | 13 replies (last September 2, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1cCSClVj

13 replies (most recent on top)

Milton Friedman is long since dead and so should his "ideals" be.

These ceo sociopaths care about no one but themselves.

And why would they? The system is so rigged that they are the only ones who benefit.

A divided house cannot stand - the extremes of perverted riches for the top and the terrible opportunities for everyone else is going to be righted, either thru the political system, or unfortunately, unrest on the streets.

That which can not be fairly earned will be taken.

Those who have stolen the nations wealth just to benefit themselves will soon relearn history.

French have much to teach us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wek+1cCSClVj

It is sad to watch this evolve. Seeing comments about ending subsidized health care and 401k matching, all very possible. There is no more accurate warning than..."be careful what you ask for". Workers today are leaning heavy toward socialist behavior and expectations and that will effectively eliminate any chance of individual success. Equal misery for all is the only realistic expectation if this continues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ioe+1cCSClVj

Just wait until they stop subsidizing healthcare and charge it all to the employees. Or stop the 401k match. Or just offer those to lower income people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ajb+1cCSClVj

Wall Street and stock price is the sole reason for all business decisions today. Was Not the case 60 years ago

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tmb+1cCSClVj

The vice of capitalism is the unequal distribution of wealth. The vice of socialism, is the even distribution of misery. Be careful what you wish for OP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rpu+1cCSClVj

Really, you are just now realizing that corporations are in busy to make a profit. WOW!! More ignorance on display with those of you who do not understand the world of business. If you work in corporate america you are here simply to make money and prosper.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hpf+1cCSClVj

Thank you Congress for legislating that profit is the sole motive of a corporation.

Always helping out the American worker.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jxt+1cCSClVj

Reading is a skill. Maybe actually read what was written except just throw out a political bias and hope it sticks.

Life is not a series of absolutes. There is a whole lot of gray area which one learns with experience not being a warrior behind a keyboard.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iuz+1cCSClVj

Another "non-identified generational stereotype" looking for a hand out.

Maybe if you were actually a good worker you would not have so much time to waste with stupid commentary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vrd+1cCSClVj

This post could not be more wrong.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wel+1cCSClVj

Thank lawyers for all this BS cr-p corporations have to do for employees here.

Of course they will offshore jobs to countries they don't have to worry about being sued for a lazy American looking to retire on the lawsuit proceeds from a paper cut.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qdi+1cCSClVj

Post ID: @ngm+1cCSClVj not true anymore:

In the early days just after the founding of the People's Republic, they really did ask the family of a criminal executed by gunshot to pay the cost of the bullet. There were historical reasons for this, such as the notion that those being shot were bad persons and The People shouldn't have to foot the bill for such types - the issue here being one of conceptual framing. Money was also tight at the time, an economic issue. You can read references to the above in various of the historical works covering the period from 1949 on up to the Cultural Revolution.

Only later was there no longer a requirement to pay the cost of the bullet. This, of course, was to do with progress made in thinking, economically and in how law was understood.

https://ask.metafilter.com/196673/Did-China-ever-actually-send-prisoners-families-a-bill-for-the-bullet

Oh, BTW, have you tried to get a copy of the autopsy report, of a loved one, here, in the US? Do you think it's free?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wnc+1cCSClVj

You realize in China when they execute a person they charge the family for the bullet? The only people paying wealth distribution taxes are people the govt hates.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ngm+1cCSClVj

Post a reply

: