Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

CWA's Response to Elliott Management's "Activate AT&T" proposal.

An interesting read. Letter sent to Randall Stephenson and the Board on 9/25.

https://otp.tools.investis.com/clients/us/atnt2/sec/sec-show.aspx?Type=html&FilingId=13666492&CIK=0000732717&Index=10000

by
| 1473 views | | 9 replies (last October 4, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+11jeIrMc

9 replies (most recent on top)

"Who in the world still has a landline...no one!"

  1. 7% of homes have landline telephones. You are never going to get rid of landlines, cause families with high incomes want landlines because they actually value their safety and the safety of their family, and will gladly pay the small amount to be able to have a communication line that works in an emergency.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ejz+11jeIrMc

“Copper in general is becoming more and more obsolete. I don't see how they make money on rural copper, so if they can find a s—er to sell or give away the copper, they should do it.”

Newsflash: At&t has way more copper terminations than fiber and that copper is being used to provide c-appy internet service as VDSL aka u-verse. So until att gets its head out of its a– and terminates fiber to all homes, you will still need wireline techs to support the copper plant, even if it’s just copper between the fiber node and the home.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3omg+11jeIrMc

" Who in the world still has a landline...no one! "

I would suppose those that live in rural areas who have no or next to no cellular signal need some method to make emergency calls as mandated by the FCC.

Thus, wireline will exist until cellular coverage is 100%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kfn+11jeIrMc
Do the opposite of what the CWA proposes and the company will be fine
No one cares what CWA thinks or says.

I am dying laughing. Too true. Lets get behind people who can't think for themselves! Sounds like a great plan!!!

One area where we don't have enough information is whether or not wireline telephony makes money any more

Seriously, can you imagine how much it costs to maintain the wireline infrastructure...with no paying customers. Who in the world still has a landline...no one! Wireline is the biggest boat anchor out there. Verizon was genius for kicking it to the curb. Not sure how they did it. I thought the government required ATT to hire/keep union employees. If not, then why is wireline still here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1txx+11jeIrMc

Do the opposite of what the CWA proposes and the company will be fine.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvd+11jeIrMc

No one cares what CWA thinks or says.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nun+11jeIrMc

My guess is, the way to go is probably in the middle between Elliot and CWA. When AT&T bought Time Warner, they said it would be "accretive" to the dividend. In a world of declining and negative interest rates, AT&T stock has been buoyed by investors seeking income, so I do not see selling Warner.

Some of this other stuff, particularly wireline, CWA pointed out the best reasons to dump those assets, namely, when Verizon sold similar assets, the purchasers did badly. Why retain similar assets on AT&T's books, which drags the whole corporation down.

One area where we don't have enough information is whether or not wireline telephony makes money any more. They bundle these results into the "Entertainment Group". I think they're losing money, and getting rid of as much landline telephony as possible would help AT&T's results.

Copper in general is becoming more and more obsolete. I don't see how they make money on rural copper, so if they can find a s—er to sell or give away the copper, they should do it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dnj+11jeIrMc

Way to go, digging up dirt on Elliott... and how many CWA members lost their jobs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jtu+11jeIrMc

Just a “we’re behind you all the way” letter

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uae+11jeIrMc

Post a reply

: