Let em have it!
10 replies (most recent on top)
I think you’re all looking at the survey the wrong way. The board, HR, and whoever else is involved don’t really care about the results—as long as the response rate is high. A high response rate lets them say employees are engaged, but if participation were low, they’d start sweating because it would suggest people don’t care enough to take part in company initiatives. I personally will boycott the survey from now on.
Not agree or disagree is a good answer or not?
@jf I did not give the board top marks, but also not rock-bottom ones. They are not perfect but generally okay-ish.
Most of my colleagues think so, too.
And most rather do the needful instead of gossiping. We are a strong team.
I think they are able to classify the teams . I mean say you have 3 colleagues from America and 10 from European country . The management above you , knows this survey came from Americas ?
Just remember. It’s confidential, not anonymous.
It doesn’t change a thing! That being said… give the board the lowest possible scores! It made me feel better and their score will be simply awesome (If we ever see it)!
No matter what you do, the leadership will have at least 70% approval this time. They have already made sure of that.
Unfiltered is rigged. Managers withhold salary appraisals for people who give a bad unfiltered score. Or give the whole team a worse performance rating if they cannot figure out who is giving a bad rating to management. A majority of colleagues are too scared to vote negatively. And because every area is focused on high participation, you will see everyone vote positively.
Need to hit the leadership directly and not our direct manager. I hope we can let them “have” it, but with the 12k layoffs they want done, I doubt they have any sympathy/empathy at all.