So what are we going to do for the next big sensation at AT&T?
Massive layoffs? Rebadging? Becoming India's number one creator of jobs? With this leadership team, the possibilities are endless!
So what are we going to do for the next big sensation at AT&T?
Massive layoffs? Rebadging? Becoming India's number one creator of jobs? With this leadership team, the possibilities are endless!
I remember the Iphone launch and I remember the power plant in a major POP being on the edge of overload before the launch of the Iphone. Lose 1 or 2 rectifiers and the plant is in battery discharge. (That means many things are going to stop working after a few hours.) The question was asked to "leadership" What part of the network do you want to pull the breaker on...
@dax+15bNzLvS The iPhone launch was prior to SBC coming in and driving the company into the ground. The Cingular team did a great job. There was a lot of revenue and profit. Once SBC came in they started pushing out and diluting the Cingular leadership.
The uVerse product was actually a great product that suffered from stagnation. A refresh a few years after launch along with some renegeotion of licensing of the set-top box software would have kept it a flagship. It was able to reach a lot of rural areas that locked in a bundle with Internet service. SBC leadership ran uVerse into the ground.
The T-Mobile merger was a disaster. The DTV purchase should have never happened. The Time Warner move should have never happened. AT&T lost its foundation and they tried to buy more customers by purchasing companies as their offerings were not compelling enough without buying the customers.
AT&T has not had a successful product launch in ~15 years... remember the launch of the iPhone...?? No meaningful network upgrades and it brought the network to its knees.... despite having a ~3 year exclusive, T was not able to gain market share... U-verse...?? Never profitable and a very messy installation process.... Digital home...?? Failed... all of these had one thing in common, AT&T didn’t want to be best, they wanted to deliver on the cheap, betting the “AT&T brand” would cover up their failure to plan and execute.... HBO max is the same.... a high profile debut like this at a premium price should have had best in market user experience... it doesn’t... the AT&T brand now stands for over promising, under delivering at a premium price... sad, this coming from a 27 year AT&T retired employee (first 25 was great, the last 2 I would think, what the heck are we doing....?).