Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Mr.Hill, this needs to be your playbook not what you are doing now….

Take Nike stock back to $100+. 9 steps. 2 years. No $50 million consulting firm required.

If I were running Nike, these are the nine things I’d prioritize to get our stock back above $100 within two years. No revolutionary restructuring, no 150-slide PowerPoint about unlocking synergies. Just getting back to what made Nike great.

  1. Pricing: Stop Pricing Out Our Customers

Nike has gotten ridiculously expensive. A Tech Fleece tracksuit is nearly $300, and shoes that cost $120 a few years ago are now pushing $160+. Have manufacturing costs really increased that much, or are we just testing how much customers will tolerate? We’ve spent years raising prices while making our products less accessible. At some point, premium pricing becomes corporate greed, and customers eventually walk away. I remember when we raised prices during Covid in the name of Covid, and then never returned them back to what they were before😂 Prices just keep going up and up in the name of corporate greed.

  1. Quality: Higher Prices Should Mean Better Products

We’re charging more while customers increasingly complain about declining quality. Go on Reddit, social media, or our own product reviews. The feedback is everywhere. Poor durability, inconsistent materials, questionable craftsmanship. Why should anyone pay more for something they believe is getting worse? Improve quality control, invest in better materials, and if necessary, make fewer products. A $180 shoe shouldn’t require the customer to perform their own quality inspection. It says a lot when I think of if I didn’t have the employee discount I probably wouldn’t even buy Nike because of what I’ve seen.

  1. Listen to Customers: They’re Literally Telling Us What’s Wrong

We have an endless supply of free consumer research through Reddit, social media, and product reviews. People consistently complain about sizing, quality, availability, and repetitive products. Yet somehow, our response seems to be releasing another 47 colorways of the same shoe. Maybe instead of spending millions researching what consumers want, we could start by listening to what they’re already telling us.

  1. Sponsorships: Invest in Everyday Athletes

Professional athletes will always be part of Nike’s DNA, but consumer inspiration has evolved. I can’t relate to LeBron James and his billion-dollar lifestyle. I can relate to the parent squeezing in a workout before work or someone training for their first marathon. Those are the people influencing everyday purchasing decisions. More so than ever, the younger generations are disconnected from professional athletes. I think we should maintain strategic superstar partnerships, but redirect more investment toward grassroots sports, local communities, and relatable athletes. Not every marketing campaign needs someone with a championship ring and a nine-figure contract.

  1. Sizing: Apparently, Wide Feet Aren’t Athletic

Nike says, “If you have a body, you are an athlete.” Unless, apparently, you have wide feet. For the love of God, offer more width options. Even my own parents rarely use my Friends & Family discount because the shoes they want don’t come in wide sizes. Think about that. We can’t even convince people to buy our products at a discount because they literally don’t fit. If everybody is an athlete, maybe we should make shoes everybody can wear.

  1. Protect Nike’s American Identity

Nike was born in Oregon and became a global icon through its connection to sport, innovation, and American culture. Global expansion is important, and markets like India offer enormous opportunities. But moving critical functions overseas purely to reduce costs risks eroding the institutional knowledge, culture, and identity that made Nike successful. There’s a difference between investing in India as a growth market and relocating operations because a spreadsheet says it’s cheaper. We can grow globally without hollowing out the foundation of the company.

  1. Politics: Just Focus on Great Products

Nike has created iconic campaigns by taking bold positions, but today’s political environment is increasingly polarized. Not every controversy builds brand equity, and alienating half your potential customers isn’t exactly a brilliant growth strategy. Be intentional about the issues we engage in, but focus our storytelling on sport, performance, perseverance, and community. We don’t need to participate in every political debate to prove we’re bold. Sometimes the boldest thing we can do is make a product people actually want.

  1. Employee Morale: Trust in Leadership Is Broken

You can have the greatest strategy in the world, but it’s meaningless if employees don’t believe in the people executing it. Years of layoffs, constant restructuring, shifting priorities, and limited accountability have destroyed confidence. Employees are asked to embrace the next transformation while wondering if they’ll survive the current one. Leadership needs to listen, take accountability, and rebuild trust. We don’t need another inspirational town hall about “winning together” while everyone quietly updates their LinkedIn profiles.

  1. Innovation: Remember When Nike Changed the Game?

This is arguably the most important point. Nike built its reputation on innovations like Air, Flyknit, and ZoomX, technologies that transformed entire product categories. Today, too much innovation feels niche, gimmicky, or impossible to purchase. Self-lacing shoes and foot-massaging technology are cool, but where’s the next Flyknit? And if we spend a decade developing something like Nike Mind, maybe we should make enough for customers to actually buy it. Innovation should be scalable, accessible, and meaningful. Not just something that looks impressive in a leadership presentation.

The Bottom Line: We’ve Completely Lost the Plot

I genuinely believe these nine priorities could dramatically improve employee morale, consumer sentiment, and ultimately Nike’s financial performance.

And the frustrating part? None of this is revolutionary.

Make better products. Charge reasonable prices. Listen to customers. Invest in communities. Innovate. Take care of employees. Protect the brand.

Instead, we seem obsessed with reorganizing geographies, relocating functions, cutting headcount, and calling it “strategic transformation.”

We’re rearranging the furniture while the house is on fire, then congratulating ourselves on the new floor plan. Our foundation is on fire and it seems like we are ok with that.

Nike still has one of the most powerful brands in the world. We have the talent, resources, and heritage to turn things around. But we’ve spent too long taking customer loyalty for granted, and now we’re paying the price.

Stop optimizing the PowerPoint. Start optimizing the product.

Just Do It. Seriously. Actually do it this time.


by
| 163 views | | 11 replies (last 22 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m4jvpsk5

11 replies (most recent on top)

This is every bit as arrogant and unoriginal as the overconfident and under-performing MBAs that are so often complained about here. Ex. Your super original take on price - do you think he just waves a magic wand and decreases the price? If earnings are as bad as they are at current prices, what in the world do you think is gonna happen if the price decreases while the costs stay the same? You make less money, genius. In the event that the goal was to decrease the price to make it more accessible to more people, in order to maintain current earnings, costs have to go down. How do costs go down in a market where fuel and raw materials have gone up 28% since 2020? You have to find ways to lay people off and get cheaper labor to reduce costs. But I suppose that must be accounted for in your point about moving jobs back to high cost labor markets like the US? Your take is so naïve, and emblematic of exactly the kind of ignorant overconfidence that has gotten Nike in this situation. The answers aren’t simple. I continue to be amazed by how many people really do think they’re smarter than everyone else, including the CEO

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yq+1m4jvpsk5

@dw that is chastising and epic? Use extremes much?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jt+1m4jvpsk5

If they wanted you opinions they would be asking you and you wouldn't have to be posting them here. Do you really think that they follow this site and would actually change course based on something posted here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fk+1m4jvpsk5

@a9 - lol you chastised OP for flawed proofreading because bullets weren’t numbered correctly and then you used the wrong version of “there/they’re/their” in “their is no guarantee”. Epic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1m4jvpsk5

You aren’t kidding about wider toe boxes. Over the years I’ve heard literally dozens of people tell me they don’t wear Nike footwear because it seems to be made for people with elf feet. I increasingly can’t wear Nike shoes either and I work here! As I’ve gotten older my feet have gotten wider to the point where Nike’s shoes are super uncomfortable.

And yes, if you ever post more than a paragraph here write it in notes first. This jenky website has a way of randomly reloading the page, erasing everything you were writing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cf+1m4jvpsk5

Good post. If I had to compress it, three things matter.

Innovation. Nike’s contract with the category is that product moves forward. Air, Flyknit, ZoomX were not marketing slides. They changed what people bought. When the pipeline feels niche, late, or impossible to find in your size, the company stops doing the one job only Nike can claim at that scale.

Brand. Right now the brand reads like reaction. Price up because the market allowed it. Heat because scarcity still works in meetings. Politics when the room expects a statement. There is not enough of a plain, durable story about who this is for in 2026 and what a fair full-price purchase should feel like. Without that, everything else looks like drift.

Culture. At this size, poison compounds. Layoffs, reorgs, and priority whiplash are not abstract. People stop believing the next town hall because the last three “transformations” did not touch the product and trust problems they see every day.

Employees and investors stay skeptical for a simple reason. The public story keeps centering cost takeout, footprint moves, and a leaner org chart. Those levers are real. You can run them. They are still not the root of why loyalty and sell-through broke. Until leadership names innovation, brand clarity, and internal culture as the work, not side notes before the next efficiency program, it is hard to give them credit for willingness, let alone capability, to fix what customers and employees already describe in reviews and threads like this one.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1m4jvpsk5

@ah, @a9 here... I think it is a good post.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1m4jvpsk5

A small addition, put assortment in stores across usa. The stores look empty, with less assortment in footwear, apparel and equipments . Use the real estate inside store to atleast capacity where consumers will be enticed to look around. When we show empty stores and prices are high, likely consumer will move out seeking other options. Lets fill the stores . Consumer goes online to check options amd goto store to feel the experience . Empty stores experience is absolute no.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1m4jvpsk5

@a9 OP here,

I wrote it once on the thread and the page reloaded and deleted everything, I then wrote it in notes and apparently copy pasting from there didn’t work. Writing it at 3 in the morning also doesn’t produce good QC ironically😂

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1m4jvpsk5

Nike will be on the elite athlete strategy for the next year or two till VPs realize you can’t run a whole company on exclusionary product and then move back to everyday athlete and welcome the walker back in. The walker would have moved on and they have. The everyday athlete has too through exclusionary campaigns or loosing shelf space or price or quality. There is a distinction however between designing for kohls and designing for accessible price point for the every day athlete. This nuance is over the heads of DLs DVPs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1m4jvpsk5

All that work and the bullet numbering is wrong. You railed on quality and didn't proof read...

"Protect Nike’s American Identity" two things here. 1) America's identity has evolved into something that isn't going to sell products and there is nothing on the horizon from either political party that is going to change this. 2) The foundation has eroded. Rebuilding the foundation in America will cost too much and their is no guarantee that the investment will pay off. Building new in India has no guarantee either but it is cheaper.

Your points on price, quality, and listening to customers through existing comments online are all excellent points. Nike makes products that people can live without. When you make poor quality products and price them too high people will decide to live without them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1m4jvpsk5

Post a reply

: