Totally agree.
Top heavy.
Look at Bedminster.
Stop wasting money on Diamond awards and cushy vacations.
11 replies (most recent on top)
They should be cutting VP, SVP, and EVP layers. Yes, there are a lot of kiss a-s L3s that cant sc--w in a lightbulb but its these jokers at the L5/6/7 that cause 90% of the issues bad strategic decisions and bad promotions.
Yes
why
There are a lot of mobility upper mgmt that could be let go and it wouldnt impact the business at all.
Both.
May be Cut some damn directors and AVPs. What do they do anyway? Cut Stankey, Jeremy Legg and McElfresh.
BOTH
@a8 Especially on the mobility side. Directors on up just sit and look pretty and try to tell you about their wellness routine. Total grifters. They come to the cell sites for field visits and act like they know what anything is. Soft yuppies.
@a3 , partially correct. Most Directors over delegate the work that THEY should be doing to the “grunt” ADs. The L3s & upwards make FAR too much for doing so little real, tangible work.
They won't cut associate directors before directors. Why would they? AD's have to do the same work as directors without the level 3 perks. AD is the absolute worst job title in the company so they'll be sure to continue to punish anyone with management ambitions with it. That's the T way.