Gotta make sure the ctc building has state of the art LED’s
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dek47LZR4P9/?exln=MTlnaGNldnFrZXJwNw==
10 replies (most recent on top)
@at so yea its appropriate.. we maybe axed while roberts cares about leds going up the building.
@at bahahaha you all are losing your jobs. jfc get over it. sensitive a-s
mfs
@as Again, understanding the joke and thinking it’s appropriate are two different things. People here are worried about their livelihoods. If it isn’t landing, consider the audience and the timing instead of assuming everyone else needs the irony explained to them.
@ar you dont see the irony in a mass layoff to save money, while worrying about cosmetics led lights…. You maybe part of the problem. Lol.
We arent talking about functional lighting to be able to work…. They are worrying about “cosmetics”.
Do you understand now??
@ab I understood the sarcasm. I also understand that not everyone reading this will, especially across language barriers or when they’re worried about losing their job. There’s a difference between missing a joke and making sure it doesn’t become another rumor. Clarifying that there’s no established connection between the lights and layoffs is about the people reading this. Leadership means considering how your words might land, not assuming everyone will interpret them exactly as you intended.
@a7 i dunno… maybe learn the difference between being a smarta$$ and for real.
@a6 the fact you dont see the sarcasm is pretty alarming…. lol!!
@OP learn the difference between CapEx and OpEx. Layoffs are all about OpEx.
Stop. Installing new LEDs doesn’t establish that the lighting project caused the layoffs. A major building upgrade would generally be a capital investment, while payroll is an ongoing operating cost. LED upgrades can also lower future energy bills. It’s fair to question spending priorities, but saying employees are being laid off to pay for the lights needs actual evidence.
@OP SMH